Commander PK Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 http://www.nfl.com/features/bracketology/alltimeteams?module=HP11_content_stream This will give everybody something to do between checking for updates in the free agency thread. (and complaining about the salary cap bull ****) The three Super Bowl winning teams, and the 1983 NFC Champion are included in the brackets. Vote away! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HA1LV1CT0RY Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 We are falling behind :[ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss_Hogg Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 RogerMara's probably manipulating the votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MD.C RedskinsFan Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 11 organizations have teams with 3 or more teams years in the bracket. These teams aren't surprising at all. I hope the coming years produce more teams that could be in a bracket like this. I mean if the 11 Giants can be on there... Raiders, Packers, Patriots, Giants, Cowboys, Redskins, 49ers, Vikings, Dolphins, Colts, Steelers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenspandan Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 don't get your hopes up. it's a simple popularity contest. the fact that the '91 redskins were one of the top 3 most dominant teams of all time will not matter - they'll be lucky to make it through round 2. heck they are barely beating the thoroughly ordinary 1970 colts right now. the last 20 years of embarassment and failure is even tainting our legacy at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKINS'n'Spurs Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 RogerMara's probably manipulating the votes. or if we do pull out a win in votes it will be retroactively penalized so that some Giants team wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss_Hogg Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 or if we do pull out a win in votes it will be retroactively penalized so that some Giants team wins. Zing! RogerMara: on second thought the Giants should have won the Super Bowl in in 82' date=' 87, and 91. The Redskins had an unfair advantage with the "Hogs"[/i'] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SD Skins fan Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 I've always thought that the '83 team was the best Redskins team ever, but that damn Super Bowl loss spoiled it. Most points ever at the time, largest turnover differential ever (I think it's still the NFL record?) and a 1,000 yard receiver and a 1,000 yard back. That team should have gone down as one of the best ever in the Super Bowl era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 If ES is legit, there is no ****ing way we lose this contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebowski Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 don't get your hopes up. it's a simple popularity contest. the fact that the '91 redskins were one of the top 3 most dominant teams of all time will not matter - they'll be lucky to make it through round 2. heck they are barely beating the thoroughly ordinary 1970 colts right now. the last 20 years of embarassment and failure is even tainting our legacy at this point. Maybe not. '91 Skins won the super team simulation season on ESPN last year (or was it two years ago...) http://promo.espn.go.com/espn/promotions/nfl/superleague/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommanderDOOM Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 Colts 06 over 87 Redskins pleeease. They barely beat Rex that year. Bad matchup for them. The Hogs would go...well 'hog-wild' on their ass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HA1LV1CT0RY Posted March 14, 2012 Share Posted March 14, 2012 You can vote as many times as you want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DixieFlatline Posted March 15, 2012 Share Posted March 15, 2012 don't get your hopes up. it's a simple popularity contest. the fact that the '91 redskins were one of the top 3 most dominant teams of all time will not matter - they'll be lucky to make it through round 2. heck they are barely beating the thoroughly ordinary 1970 colts right now. the last 20 years of embarassment and failure is even tainting our legacy at this point. If they make it to the second round, they may have to face the '82 Redskins. What's up with that? Of course, the '82 Skins matchup is 50/50 with the 2007 Giants now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExoDus84 Posted March 15, 2012 Share Posted March 15, 2012 91 skins were a powerhouse. They get my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scruffylookin Posted March 15, 2012 Share Posted March 15, 2012 I've always thought that the '83 team was the best Redskins team ever, but that damn Super Bowl loss spoiled it. Most points ever at the time, largest turnover differential ever (I think it's still the NFL record?) and a 1,000 yard receiver and a 1,000 yard back. That team should have gone down as one of the best ever in the Super Bowl era. They win SB18, no question they would have been remembered as one of the great teams since the merger. If they had won that one measley game against Los Angeles: 37-6 record over their last 43 games 29-3 record over the last two seasons (2 of those losses by 1 point) Back to back Super Bowl Champions Winners of 12 games in a row I still feel they are the best Redskins team I've seen and should be remembered as one of the great teams period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted March 15, 2012 Share Posted March 15, 2012 Our 1991-92 team from 1-53, top to bottom, offense to defense to special teams was our best team ever and one of the most complete teams ever in the league. I would put that team up against ANY former champion. They still have the largest margin of victory in league history amongst the SB winners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeThreeKingsRuleU Posted March 15, 2012 Share Posted March 15, 2012 don't get your hopes up. it's a simple popularity contest. the fact that the '91 redskins were one of the top 3 most dominant teams of all time will not matter - they'll be lucky to make it through round 2. heck they are barely beating the thoroughly ordinary 1970 colts right now. the last 20 years of embarassment and failure is even tainting our legacy at this point. No joke, you should see the comments for the '06 Colts vs the 87 Skins. People are so delusional Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander PK Posted March 16, 2012 Author Share Posted March 16, 2012 Well, we are into the second round and the only Redskins team still in the running is the 1991 Redskins. The good news right now is that team is beating the '07 Giants (as well they should.) Get in there and vote, and let's keep them going. ---------- Post added March-16th-2012 at 12:29 AM ---------- Well, we are into the second round and the only Redskins team still in the running is the 1991 Redskins. The good news right now is that team is beating the '07 Giants (as well they should.) Get in there and vote, and let's keep them going. ---------- Post added March-16th-2012 at 12:34 AM ---------- Our 1991-92 team from 1-53, top to bottom, offense to defense to special teams was our best team ever and one of the most complete teams ever in the league. I would put that team up against ANY former champion. They still have the largest margin of victory in league history amongst the SB winners. If this thing wasn't just a popularity contest that team deserves to at least be in the Final 4. I doubt they make it that far, but they should. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitman21ST Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 '91 Skins vs. '00 Ravens. Vote off the Ratbirds! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Commander Adama Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 How the bleep is the 91 Redskins losing to the 00 Ravens?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lone Star Skin Fan Posted March 19, 2012 Share Posted March 19, 2012 the 00 Ravens??? It would take one of the SB winners with an explosive offense to have any chance of challenging the 91 Skins. What a joke! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoagie24 Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Not a Ravens fan so I may be wrong on this,but isn't that the team that didn't score any TDs for a few games and had Trent Dilfer as the QB? I was only 11yrs old when the Skins beat the Bills that year(and for some reason I remember the '87 super bowl alot more than '91)but my father would always tell me how much they dominated pretty much everyone that year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 How the bleep is the 91 Redskins losing to the 00 Ravens?! Ravens always seem to have hacks, just like with the Mascot thing a few years ago. Also, the Ravens somehow beat the 17-0 Dolphins last week too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunBunch7 Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 I've always thought that the '83 team was the best Redskins team ever, but that damn Super Bowl loss spoiled it. Most points ever at the time, largest turnover differential ever (I think it's still the NFL record?) and a 1,000 yard receiver and a 1,000 yard back. That team should have gone down as one of the best ever in the Super Bowl era. I think Patriots fans know how we feel yet theirs is much harder to swallow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HA1LV1CT0RY Posted March 20, 2012 Share Posted March 20, 2012 Lets do this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.