WeThreeKingsRuleU

As long as there is no concrete evidence, you'll get people who say "you're just bitter because your team sucks, sure the league is run by billionaires who don't know of any other way to make a quick buck than to form a league where everything is absolutely fair and honest and would never lie or withhold the truth in order to make even more money, because the NFL is as PURE AS THE DRIVEN SNOW!" but I digress, the way you get over it is play the game within the game, take your hits and promise the league more money with promises of higher ratings. Sure, get your own RGIII. Convince your HOF c

Would you want to be the guy that ruins the NFL for every fan? Who would believe you? It doesn't take every person in the league, you don't think a "Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest" has ever happened? No, such a thing has NEVER happened in professional sports, our NFL is beyond reproach! https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/25980368/how-former-ref-tim-donaghy-conspired-fix-nba-games https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/how-to-fix-a-college-football-game-and-influence-its-outcome-in-four-steps/

I used to think this way, but I have come around on this issue. Sure, the competition committee and John Mara especially, had animus towards the Redskins and made them pay for the Albert Haynesworth contract/no cap year debacle, which was clearly collusion, although hard to prove or prosecute even though it could have had significant ripple effects down the line...the point is, there is no conspiracy where the league or anyone else tells the refs "Make sure those Redskins lose!" it's more like: "Alright, it's prime time, make sure the Cowboys win this one either handily" or "keep this game cl

hey all, I just moved to SC from VA and am having a heck of a time figuring out how to watch the games, anyone here live in SC or have any idea other than sketchy online streaming services?

It does happen though, i can think of no better example then the Saints game last year, when they actively tried to help Brees break the record before halftime, you had to be absolutely clueless not to see that coming

I heard an interview with Ryan Kerrigan early on where they asked his thoughts, he was clearly on the side of Trent and any player who holds out for contract reasons, and even cited examples of others, like coaches, who have even broken contract for more money and not received the same level of scrutiny

Yeah, and if you ever ask him a question on Twitter, he comes off as kind of a dumb dumb poopie face

"The Player" - Bill Parcells

That's what I read in to the comments. And to those saying they don't believe DHall, SIP has gotten the same intel, so I am apt to believe multiple sources reporting the same thing

Anyone else find it strange that so many high profile hold outs have all of the sudden ended their holdouts? I know the season is about to start, but...

Can I float something out there? this is a conspiracy theory but I want to know from others what the possibility of this scenario is: Trent smokes up during the off season Trent: oh ****, I might fail a drug screening, plus, forget all this training camp stuff, I hate going to that what if I tell Bruce that if I report, I might get popped and I'm out for the season what if I "hold out" until 1) training camp/preseason is over and 2) I'm not at risk to fail the drug test Trent's agent: yea, but we can't tell anyone that's why you're holding out, what if we use yo

Haha, I just had a mental image of Bruce saying to Trent: "You want to try to **** the team over? Hold my beer"

Ruh-roh, Trent is quoted as saying he "doesn't want to cost anyone their job" does that mean Penn as well? Is he coming back to the team but still not playing? After all the people pointing out his word play, could this be a valid concern?

well, then, no Bruce victory, because they said he comes back next week, week 2, not this week

I'm told, the news he broke is that Trent is planning on ending his hold out soon, someone give this a listen?