aREDSKIN Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 The rumors here in jville on the sports talk radio is that TT is going to be cut. It's not confirmed but if it pans out the skins better have his number on speed dial. He would certainly be better than any other back-up we have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spjunkies Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Say no to old. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Say no to old. Yup, 35 in November. Emergency signing only. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thinking Skins Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Say no to old. Normally i'm on that tip, but the way Mike Williams is playing, I'm not opposed to picking him up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 In the interim, ANY proven vet. help would be more than welcome. Outside of the front 5, O-line depth, or lack of, is a MAJOR concern going forward, particularly given the recent injury history of the starting group. Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ucfSKINS Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Has Pete Kendall signed anywhere yet? I think I heard he did, but not sure and too lazy/busy at work to look it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyJ Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Normally i'm on that tip, but the way Mike Williams is playing, I'm not opposed to picking him up. Yep, the Redskins will probably have to go this route. Williams is insufficient. If you keep him and he has to play, we're going to be seeing a lot Yoder, too, in order to help him block. It's like they'll be this one very wide person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Normally i'm on that tip, but the way Mike Williams is playing, I'm not opposed to picking him up. As bad as the back-up linemen have looked, Williams could well end up getting a roster spot by default, which given his poor play as you mentioned would be nothing to get excited over. Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyJ Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 In the interim, ANY proven vet. help would be more than welcome.Outside of the front 5, O-line depth, or lack of, is a MAJOR concern going forward, particularly given the recent injury history of the starting group. Hail. I think the Skins are OK with depth at G/C. T, not so much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinC Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I have read similar reports that Tony Pashos is on the block in Jacksonville as well. Either one would be a big upgrade on any backup we currently have. In any case I think we have to be looking at the waiver wire to upgrade or depth at OT - if one of Samuels or Heyer go down it looks a bit bleak right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I think the Skins are OK with depth at G/C. Why? Because you had trouble getting around one of them while trying to get your hands on a jar of Mayo in Be-Lo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuryYourDuke Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Mike Williams does scare the bejesus out of me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icbmayday Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Yea i rather go back with Kendel before I would take a look at Thomas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Old Bay Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I think the Skins are OK with depth at G/C. T, not so much. I'd agree with that. Between Montgomery, Bridges and Rhinehardt we should be alright in the middle. But there really is no one on the outside. Bridges' versatility with the tackle position is mitigated by the fact that he isn't that good on the outside. If either Heyer or Samuels goes down at this point we're in serious trouble. That's probably the biggest concern I have going into the season right now, because in all likelyhood one of them is going to get hurt this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 For depth, certainly. Better than Williams and Bridges. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Has Pete Kendall signed anywhere yet? I think I heard he did, but not sure and too lazy/busy at work to look it up. No he's still available but I think he's insisting on a starting role and more than the vet min. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santana_4_prez Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I hope this guy gets cut, so we can sign him: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgundy Burner Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I have read similar reports that Tony Pashos is on the block in Jacksonville as well. This would be a much better option and he is six years younger than TT. Pashos could have three good years left in him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinC Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Yea i rather go back with Kendel before I would take a look at Thomas. Pete Kendall is a guard Tra Thomas is a tackle. We have decent depth at guard but not so much at tackle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyJ Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Why?Because you had trouble getting around one of them while trying to get your hands on a jar of Mayo in Be-Lo? sierragulf nailed it. I think between Bridges, Rinehart, and Montgomery, you have guys that can come in and perform competently enough that the team won't suffer tremendously for it. It's a far different situation at T, where play in space is much more critical. The three interior backups are pretty typical of NFL OL depth. The Redskins are, at worst, no worse off there than your typical team, and perhaps better off. Are there teams that you consider to be much better off with interior OL depth than the Redskins? If so, why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MartinC Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I hope this guy gets cut, so we can sign him: Get with the programme - thats what we offer as a trade :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aREDSKIN Posted September 4, 2009 Author Share Posted September 4, 2009 This would be a much better option and he is six years younger than TT. Pashos could have three good years left in him. Pashos is being moved to G. He got a big bonus last year and the Jags will not release him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MumboSauce Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I think we definitely need to look to a cut Vet for back up tackle, the answer isn't on our roster I don't believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santana_4_prez Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 Get with the programme - thats what we offer as a trade :doh: LOL, I want to sign him as a free agent, so we can trade him later! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sens11 Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 I believe he has some game left..but it would have to be a vet min + incentives at most... The Eagles O-Line is not nearly the same either. It wouldn't be the worst thing in the world to "snake" him from a potential Philadlephia return.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.