RWJ Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Does anyone have a credible site that show what draft picks we have next year? I can't find one on any search engine. Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurd Cudins Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 we don't have our fourth. the rest depends on Kendall. if he plays 80% of the snaps we give up a fourth in 2009. if he doesn't, we give up our fifth THIS year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted November 13, 2007 Author Share Posted November 13, 2007 we don't have our fourth. the rest depends on Kendall. if he plays 80% of the snaps we give up a fourth in 2009. if he doesn't' date=' we give up our fifth THIS year.[/quote']If we have our 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th and 7th, hopefully we can rebuild using the draft next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 If we have our 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th and 7th, hopefully we can rebuild using the draft next year. Just actually having a 1st 2nd and 3rd will be huge. I can't even remember what it feels like to have picks in all 3 early rounds. DL, WR, OL pls kthx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genghis Khan Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 I think we should look to draft a blocking TE so that cooley can be used alot more in the passing game I get mad having to see him block. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkekoa Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 I think we should look to draft a blocking TE so that cooley can be used alot more in the passing game I get mad having to see him block. You can draft a big ogre in the later rounds to block as TE. They don't have the flash to go early. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 I think we should look to draft a blocking TE so that cooley can be used alot more in the passing game I get mad having to see him block. Don't be surprised to see Tyler Ecker back and we picked up Cody Boyd from the Steelers. Boyd is like 280. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin11 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Isn't Yoder a decent blocker? Can't we just put an extra LT to play TE? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Isn't Yoder a decent blocker? Can't we just put an extra LT to play TE? He's good a getting false starts. Not a TE but I like Owen Schmidt from WVU, this kid gets mad at himself and beats his helmet against his forehead on the sidelines, he's a damn animal and will be available LATE in the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2006Skins Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 If we have our 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 6th and 7th, hopefully we can rebuild using the draft next year. That's waaaayyyy too many. We'll be able to trade at least half of those in order to sign someone with a little talent. Is Mike Williams still on the Raiders? Signed, Vinny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan07 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 He's good a getting false starts.Not a TE but I like Owen Schmidt from WVU, this kid gets mad at himself and beats his helmet against his forehead on the sidelines, he's a damn animal and will be available LATE in the draft He's a beast! 2nd best FB in the nation IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drunken Master III Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 He's a beast! 2nd best FB in the nation IMO. Hasn't Gibbs drafted enough FB's? :laugh: :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
voicekiller Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 We need a DE, CB, WR, DT, OL, hopefully we get some good players through the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabee1973 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 we don't have our fourth. the rest depends on Kendall. if he plays 80% of the snaps we give up a fourth in 2009. if he doesn't' date=' we give up our fifth THIS year.[/quote']who has our fourth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corrupt3d Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 who has our fourth? Denver. See: TJ Duckett :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
method man Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Denver. See: TJ Duckett:doh: Are you guys sure? I seriously doubt Duckett met enough incentives for us to give up the fourth also. Our third was high enough I think as well that that itself should have satisfied the conditions in that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clathel Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Unfortunately, We get screwed every time we deal with Denver. We should never have given up Bailey and a second for CP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corrupt3d Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Are you guys sure? I seriously doubt Duckett met enough incentives for us to give up the fourth also. Our third was high enough I think as well that that itself should have satisfied the conditions in that deal. i dont think that trade was incentive based edit: i think you might be right http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_NFL_Draft#Third_round Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 As much as I would like tod raft skill positions early, gotta go with the trenches now. Best available DE and OL in the first two rounds. Then try and find a WR and CB in the next two. More DL and OL depth in the last two rounds. Any combination of that will definitely help out our situation. I think it should just be DE, OL, WR, CB, OL, OL. I think with Wilson, Evans, Golston, Alexander, et. al., we have decent d-line depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinsinparadise Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Just actually having a 1st 2nd and 3rd will be huge. I can't even remember what it feels like to have picks in all 3 early rounds. DL, WR, OL pls kthx. Agree though its a bit early to count our chickens. the Skins have some time to trade them away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Have to agree. OL is a priority right now. Drafting WR high is dicey at best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttr77 Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Great! We have almost all our picks! Who's doing the picking? Oh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H@iL2Gibb$ Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 i dont think that trade was incentive basededit: i think you might be right http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_NFL_Draft#Third_round 49ers to Patriots. The San Francisco 49ers traded their first-round selection in the 2008 Draft to the New England Patriots, as well as the 110th overall selection in the 2007 Draft (used to select John Bowie) in exchange for the 28th overall selection in the 2007 Draft (used to select Joe Staley) My gosh, looks like the Pats will get a top 5 pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loxley Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 49ers to Patriots. The San Francisco 49ers traded their first-round selection in the 2008 Draft to the New England Patriots, as well as the 110th overall selection in the 2007 Draft (used to select John Bowie) in exchange for the 28th overall selection in the 2007 Draft (used to select Joe Staley)My gosh, looks like the Pats will get a top 5 pick Yes, which is why half of the football following nation called out for them to lose both of their 1st rounders after the spying affair. Losing a pick in the 30s is nothing when you have a top 5 still from someone else. No wonder Belichick always looks so darned smug. :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlayAction Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Skins traded a 3rd and 4th for Lloyd. Were all of those picks given up last year or are any still due to the 49ers? Whatever picks the Skins have they need to use them wisely because they are in desperate need in so many places: WR (high priority - possible second round), OL (3rd rounder would be good), DT/DE (need first round talent), CB (we are already out of top picks but Springs may be on his last year). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.