lavar1156 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/powerranking?season=2007&week=0 2007 Power Rankings: Offseason RK (LW)TEAMRECCOMMENT1 (3)Patriots12-4-0Just one minute away from a trip to the Super Bowl, the Patriots were arguably the NFL's most active team this offseason, adding big-ticket items such as Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas. 2 (4)Colts12-4-0What, the Pats sign a receiver or two and everyone forgets about the defending Super Bowl champs? Fine. But let's see Randy Moss or Tom Brady do better than Peyton did on "Saturday Night Live."3 (1)Chargers14-2-0Weird offseason for the Chargers. They're clearly one of the NFL's most talented teams and will be there in the postseason. But the way their season ended and the firing of Marty Schottenheimer has created some negative feelings.4 (2)Ravens13-3-0If he's healthy, Willis McGahee is going to be a stud in Baltimore and will give the running game a boost over Jamal Lewis.5 (5)Bears13-3-0Lance Briggs is unhappy. Cedric Benson is unproven. And Rex Grossman is still Rex Grossman. The good news is the Bears are still in the NFC North.6 (6)Saints10-6-0A great offense added another weapon with first-round WR Robert Meachem. The Saints strengthened their secondary, but there are still concerns about a defense that couldn't stop the run last year.7 (12)Broncos9-7-0After a disappointing end to the 2006 season, the Broncos were extremely busy this offseason, adding impact starters in TE Daniel Graham, RB Travis Henry and CB Dre' Bly. Denver should push the Chargers in the AFC West.8 (7)Eagles10-6-0We can sort of understand why Donovan McNabb would be confused by the drafting of Kevin Kolb. But at the same time, should a franchise QB really be that concerned about a rookie second-round pick?9 (11)Cowboys9-7-0The Cowboys' players sure seem glad to have Wade Phillips in place of Bill Parcells. But will he actually make them a better team?10 (14)Bengals8-8-0While their tough schedule was partly to blame, the Bengals' 8-8 finish last season was a disappointment. Anything short of a trip to the playoffs in 2007 will be equally disappointing.11 (9)Seahawks9-7-0Shaun Alexander's health. That's as simple as it gets for the Seahawks. Seattle needs a healthy Alexander to regain its spot among the elite teams in the NFC.12 (8)Jets10-6-0It might not have made the same kind of headlines as the Patriots' grabbing Randy Moss, but the Jets' acquisition of running back Thomas Jones could end up being one of the best moves of the offseason.13 (13)Steelers8-8-0It's pretty obvious for the Steelers. If Ben Roethlisberger returns to form, the Steelers are clearly a playoff contender. But if he's closer to the QB who struggled last season, the Steelers will be in trouble.14 (17)Jaguars8-8-0So, do a quarterback (Byron Leftwich) and head coach (Jack Del Rio) need to like each other for a team to succeed? Guess we'll find out this year in Jacksonville.15 (23)49ers7-9-0In the wide-open NFC West, there's no reason the 49ers can't compete for a playoff spot this season.16 (20)Panthers8-8-0The Panthers had a solid draft, but after falling in love with them last season (see Super Bowl predictions) only to get crushed, it's safer to take a wait-and-see approach for now. 17 (16)Giants8-8-0Brandon Jacobs might be the biggest risk/reward player in fantasy football for 2007. 18 (18)Rams8-8-0The Rams had a solid offseason and appear ready to keep moving forward in Scott Linehan's second season. 19 (22)Falcons7-9-0The Falcons have put their future in the hands of Michael Vick. Who could be so, umm, bold? We're drawing a Blank. 20 (10)Chiefs9-7-0Damon Huard played well last year and Brodie Croyle might have a bright future, but it's pretty clear that QB is a major issue in Kansas City right now.21 (15)Titans8-8-0Didn't exactly add any playmakers to the offense, but they still have VY and offensive coordinator Norm Chow, and that's good enough. (BTW, how is Chow not a head coach somewhere yet?)22 (28)Cardinals5-11-0Looks like the Cardinals are going to be a popular ''sleeper'' pick again. Will this be the year they actually wake up and make something happen?23 (21)Bills7-9-0The Bills clearly wanted to get younger this offseason, waving goodbye to a number of key veterans. But will it make them better on the field? That's largely in J.P. Losman's hands. 24 (19)Packers8-8-0Justin Harrell may be a good player, but why not get Brett Favre some playmakers instead of supplementing a defense that returns 11 starters? 25 (26)Vikings6-10-0Adrian Peterson is the kind of player who can turn a franchise around. He'll make QB Tarvaris Jackson that much better and by the end of the year, this may be the best offense in the NFC North. 26 (24)Dolphins6-10-0With Trent Green as their starting QB, the Dolphins could be a solid team. With Cleo Lemon, not so much.27 (29)Buccaneers4-12-0How many QBs does a team need? Jeff Garcia, Chris Simms, Bruce Gradkowski, Luke McCown and, just for fun, maybe Jake Plummer. Clipboards for everybody!28 (27)Redskins5-11-0Obviously Jason Campbell will be in the spotlight in Washington. But the glare will be even brighter on defensive coordinator Gregg Williams. Regarded as one of the NFL's best defensive minds, Williams' defense ranked 31st in the NFL last season.29 (25)Texans6-10-0Matt Schaub is doing all the right things early and adding Ahman Green will help. Just one small detail the Texans forgot: get a few big guys who can block. 30 (31)Lions3-13-0Greatest Show on Turf, Part II? With WRs Roy Williams, Mike Furrey and Calvin Johnson, Mike Martz must be having flashbacks to his days in St. Louis.31 (30)Browns4-12-0The Browns had a solid offseason, remaking their offensive line with the addition of Joe Thomas and Eric Steinbach. But a solid offseason won't help Romeo Crennel if the Browns have another 4-12 season32 (32)Raiders2-14-0The reviews on Lane Kiffin and JaMarcus Russell have been all positive. But as good as they might be, they're going to take a lot of lumps this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllAboutSkins08 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 no surprises here.... power rankings during the offseason are useless anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 we're not 32nd? :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lavar1156 Posted May 17, 2007 Author Share Posted May 17, 2007 I don't get why we moved down 1 spot. I seriously don't think we are the 28th best team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThePreciating Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Yes nice rankings. Tampa is better than us now since they picked up Calvin Johnson. Wait, no they didn't. They're even older than they were last year. But yeah they should be ahead of us in the rankings. I fully support equal rights, but hiring a mentally retarded person to be a sportswriter is just bad for business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lowghost Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Not surprised, that is where we should be ranked at this time. :2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo#44 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 no surprises here....power rankings during the offseason are useless anyway. Patriots - 2007: Just one minute away from a trip to the Super Bowl, the Patriots were arguably the NFL's most active team this offseason, adding big-ticket items such as Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas. Redskins - 2000: Just a botched field-goal away from a the NFC Championship game, the Redskins were arguably the NFL's most active team this offseason, adding big-ticket items such as Dieon Sanders and Bruce Smith. Way too eerie! It seems like this is going to blow up in NE's face - but then again they're so hot right now they could take a crap, wrap it in tin foil, put a couple of fish hooks on it and sell it to Queen Elizabeth as earrings! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedFan4Life Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Woot top 5 pick for next years draft!!!!! Cant wait Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKM311 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Not surprised, that is where we should be ranked at this time. :2cents: I don't think so. I think if you look at just a few of the teams, like the Bucs and Dolphins, you should see us better than them today! I do not think were close to a top 10 team, but were not close to be the 28th team either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Bulletin board material. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommDownMan Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Not surprised, that is where we should be ranked at this time. :2cents: Don't know about should be, but I definitely don't mind having no where to go but up (almost). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisc0015 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 I have no problem with this ranking. Although I wouldn't select the Skins to #28, I'd choose probably #10 (but I'm a homer) ... it is hard to argue with the media, because almost every year we bring in talented players, and almost every year we struggle. Why should 2007 be any different? I understand each and every reason why 2007 will be different, but then again, I've known why each season would be different for the past 10 years. I honestly don't care anymore what the Skins are projected to accomplish, I'll determine in January whether the Redskins had a successful season or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AllAboutSkins08 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Patriots - 2007: Just one minute away from a trip to the Super Bowl, the Patriots were arguably the NFL's most active team this offseason, adding big-ticket items such as Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas.Redskins - 2000: Just a botched field-goal away from a the NFC Championship game, the Redskins were arguably the NFL's most active team this offseason, adding big-ticket items such as Dieon Sanders and Bruce Smith. Way too eerie! It seems like this is going to blow up in NE's face - but then again they're so hot right now they could take a crap, wrap it in tin foil, put a couple of fish hooks on it and sell it to Queen Elizabeth as earrings! nothing would make me happier than watching this blow up in NE's face....and then watch the ESPN spin control go to work to save their reputation. but i'm sure that my luck isn't that good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aston Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Patriots - 2007: Just one minute away from a trip to the Super Bowl, the Patriots were arguably the NFL's most active team this offseason, adding big-ticket items such as Randy Moss and Adalius Thomas.Redskins - 2000: Just a botched field-goal away from a the NFC Championship game, the Redskins were arguably the NFL's most active team this offseason, adding big-ticket items such as Dieon Sanders and Bruce Smith. Way too eerie! It seems like this is going to blow up in NE's face - but then again they're so hot right now they could take a crap, wrap it in tin foil, put a couple of fish hooks on it and sell it to Queen Elizabeth as earrings! :laugh:That is crazy how close they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThomasRoane Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 I'd say Gibbs has em right where he wants em Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angel2 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Why do you guys care about power rankings anyway? They are just for bragging rights until the real season starts. Move on with something of substance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Brace ourselves for what? This ranking is no different than all the other BS power rankings that goes on during the offseason. They are just going off of what they saw last season. The bottomline is, if we want to be ranked higher, then we have to win more and have more picks. It's not rocket science. So why can't we do it. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fifty Gut Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 :laugh: every offseason, same bandwagon fan love for the Cowboys they haven't won a single playoff game in over a decade yet continue to get ranked in the top 10? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard Washington Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 could be a little easier to read....j/k i don't mind the ranking. if we can stay healthy, we can only improve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walking Deadman Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Good. Hate on us.......that's what I want. Keep us under the radar. That's what the media did in 2005. Thanks ESPN, it's not what you wanted, but it's what we needed. :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonArtest15 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Eh...it's to be expected....for a lot of you all up-in-arms over this, please be sure to check out the power rankings for the New Orleans Saints at this time last year...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clintmsp Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 That's alright we were ranked 31st in '05 and Baltimore was ranked top 15...what happened that season again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rhyno Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Not surprised, that is where we should be ranked at this time. :2cents: Ihave to strongly disagree with this statement. Actually, power rankings are useless all the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 Blah blah blah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smoot Point Really Posted May 17, 2007 Share Posted May 17, 2007 These Power Rankings are better at the top than Sportslines... However, I have some serious questions about teams like Denver, KC and Miami... New coach in Miami and not a whole lot of improvement. Over-rated coach in KC with questionable QBs. Denver may end up decent, but 7th best team? That's a bit generous... I'd drop them another 8 spots or so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.