SoCalRaider Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Excerpt followed by link (apologies if this is a repost)... Originally posted by WarpathInsiders According to the retraction, the Redskins didn't feel he was one of the top free agents available which could mean they might be close to landing Oakland Raider Charles Woodson. http://story.scout.com/a.z?s=71&p=2&c=356216 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Seems awfully speculative... but thanks for posting. (I don't think we could afford Woodson, either.) ....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gilgamesh Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Why would we do this? Unless it's for less than a $10 Million SB...that I'm up for... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Synergist Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 He's over-rated.. I'd rather keep smoot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bat~man Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 i doubt it , kinda costly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da#1skinsfan Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Originally posted by Synergist He's over-rated.. I'd rather keep smoot Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Oh jeez... :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Don't want him. Let's keep Smoot instead. We have other pressing needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird_1972 Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Postons = no chance of signing with Skins. (at least I hope) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4SB Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 How could they assume the Redskins think Woodson is the best CB in the market? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrazyZeb Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Its amazing how these "reporters" can just jump to such random conclusions. What ever happened to finding out actual facts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorPickSix Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 It's that time folks. Get used to see thing alot the next couple of days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGGS_DADDY Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 H.E.L.L. NO!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 :no: I don't think so. He is injury prone, he's over rated, and I too think that he cost just as much if not more than Smooty, in which case we will keep Smoot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Bonehead move by us if we do this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsGuy Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Woodson would want more money than Smoot. Plus, if the Postons are his agent, no way the Redskins will intentionally wade into that quicksand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooper Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 I'd rather just go with Harris and Jimoh than sign Woodson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
galentjm Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Woodson has publicly stated that he wants a contract that exceeds the deal that Denver gave Champ. If we weren't willing to fork out that kind of dough for Champ I find it hard to believe that we'd do it for an injury prone knuckle head like Woodson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bnacpa Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 The silver lining in going after Woodson (I don't think we are that stupid) would be that Bang would have another great cartoon regarding the Postons. I am surprised that he didn't come out with another one last year regarding some of their players ending up injured: Julian Peterson, Charles Rogers, Ty Law and LaVar Arrington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Renegade7 Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 We need Charles Woodson like we need another hole in our head. *rather get Rolle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ECU-ALUM Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Excuse me...I could be wrong about this but...wasn't Woodson franchised by Oakland? I hope we don't end up giving Oakland our #9 pick for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
REDSKINS STOMP Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 If we would go after Moss because of his attitude, I don't see why we would go after Woodson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDane Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Certainly not the rumor I expected to see when I got back from my 30 minute Extremeskins hiatus... :confused: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Say no to Woodson. He has more baggage than Chevy Chase's family heading on their European Vacation :laugh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted March 2, 2005 Share Posted March 2, 2005 Originally posted by bulldog Say no to Woodson. He has more baggage than Chevy Chase's family heading on their European Vacation :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.