Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Election 2024 & Presidential Cage Match: Dark Brandon 46 vs Felonious Farty 45


88Comrade2000

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, tshile said:


At some point, somewhere, decisions have to be made about what’s more important. What over rules what. Things collide. 
 

the notion of an unbiased person making maps is hilarious because the requirement of bias is sort of baked into the problem. 
 

it’s a question of least worst situation. Unsurprisingly, different people have different opinions about what should overrule what. (Obviously we also have people intentionally screwing thinks up)

 

but everyone also views their preference as what is “fair” and anyone that disagrees as being “biased”

 

 

Ok, this really proves you didn't read it lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also - I’ve listened to people that make maps for these things. The supposedly unbiased and independent people

 

the statistical analysis and political data mining is super neat and awesome 

 

but even they are forced to admit that at some point, decisions need to be made about what matters. 
 

it will be funny to see what a bunch of random citizens, with no expertise in anything related to this, from Ohio, come up with. 

Just now, Califan007 The Constipated said:

 

 

Ok, this really proves you didn't read it lol...

So what from the article rules out what I said?

 

because a judge screens them? Because they get to play captain?

 

what part of your article addresses the reality of demographics, how they change, and how it relates to politics and trying to divide people up into neat little blocks that makes everyone happy?

 

or are you just going to recite the Gingles requirements?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Renegade7 said:

 

Very true, and this is shockingly similar to what VA is doing as well.  It speaks to how hard it is to be "fair" here and need for throwing "neutral" parties in the blender with folks that we know what they think to try to get something "balanced".

 

It just feels inevitable the new generation of AI gets a crack at at least helping with this problem (tracing back to who's providing the prompt and near impossibility of being a true neutral party).


the AI still has to make those same decisions. If you look at how it’s done in the past, it’s made some laughably awful maps. It’s getting better. It’s probably safe to say the AI generated stuff has a solid chance of being better than the partisan stuff at this point. 
 

I’ve listened to people that are hired as experts to provide analysis of maps for the purpose of fighting for/against these maps. 
 

they know how hard it is. They understand you must make decisions about what overrules what. Is it skin color? Is the presence of another minority-majority district of the absence of one? Or is it their politics - or specifically what do you do when the politics don’t match the preconception based on skin color? Get two experts talking about why they each produced different maps for the same area, and it’s fun to watch. 
 

and how do you deal with a map that appears wrong because Side A claims these are their people, but last election the people voted for Side B? (This comes up…)

 

it’s a challenging topic. The experts say so. 
 

I’ll defer to the experts over people on a forum with zero experience in any of it. 

Edited by tshile
  • Thumb up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, tshile said:

 

So what from the article rules out what I said?

 

 

because a judge screens them? Because they get to play captain?

 

what part of your article addresses the reality of demographics, how they change, and how it relates to politics and trying to divide people up into neat little blocks that makes everyone happy?

 

or are you just going to recite the Gingles requirements?

 

I'll take it line by line, cuz I've already been goofing off this morning, what's 5 more minutes lol...

 

1) "At some point, somewhere, decisions have to be made about what’s more important. What over rules what. Things collide."

 

From the article--here are the things that are absolutely the most important and all must be met for the maps to be approved:

  • geographic contiguity of districts;

  • compliance with federal laws such as the Voting Rights Act;

  • a ban on favoring or disfavoring any party

  • a prohibition on considering any candidate or incumbent's place of residence

  • maps must reflect the state's overall partisan balance as determined by statewide elections over the past 6 years

  • districts that favored either party in those same statewide races would have to come within 3 percentage points of each party's level of statewide support

  • counting people incarcerated in state prisons at their last known address to curtail prison gerrymandering

  • ensuring that racial, ethnic, or language minorities that are politically cohesive and geographically concentrated have the equal ability to elect their preferred candidates

  • preserving "communities of interest" - where residents have "broadly shared interests" based on factors such as "common ethnic, racial, social, cultural, geographic, environmental, socioeconomic, or historic identities or concerns."

 

2) "the notion of an unbiased person making maps is hilarious because the requirement of bias is sort of baked into the problem."

 

From the article:

  • There's no mention of anyone being "unbiased"...the amendment feels it's found a way, though, of minimizing bias from the commission
  • 15 people make the maps, not "an unbiased person" as you put it
  • The maps would have to go through a series of public hearings around the state, so it's even further removed from "an unbiased person making maps"
  • any Ohio voter would have up to 10 days to challenge it in court, yet another level away from "an unbiased person making maps"
  • the Ohio Supreme Court would have exclusive jurisdiction over whether or not the maps are approved when challenged
  •  

3) "Unsurprisingly, different people have different opinions about what should overrule what."

 

See the first set of bullet points lol...it's already in the proposal what should overrule what.

 

4) "but everyone also views their preference as what is “fair” and anyone that disagrees as being “biased” "

 

Again, "fair" appears to have been defined for the commission...they're not leaving it up to the commission to define it. Their job is to find maps that fit the criteria laid out, not to each give their personal definition of "fair".

 

There's a lot to scrutinize and criticize in this plan, but the way you decided to describe it does not match what's in the article, at all.

 

That's why I kept saying you didn't read the article lol...because the only other choices were:

 

- You did read it but didn't understand it

- You did read it and did understand it, but were being disingenuous in describing what it said

 

I chose option 1 lol...

 

EDIT: But I should have gone with option 3, as you'll see from tshile's next two responses to me 👍

Edited by Califan007 The Constipated
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Califan007 The Constipated said:

 

I see I should have chosen option 3 lol...

Me: there’s lots of choices that have to be made, and people have different views on what is more important

 

you: nah here’s a list and it’s the only one that matters

 

Tell me you don’t know a thing about redistricting without telling me you don’t know a thing about redistricting 👍

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, tshile said:

Me: there’s lots of choices that have to be made, and people have different views on what is more important

 

you: nah here’s a list and it’s the only one that matters

 

Tell me you don’t know a thing about redistricting without telling me you don’t know a thing about redistricting 👍

 

Yeah, I definitely should have chosen option 3 lol...I should have remembered your description of what you claimed caused the J6 riots.

 

But I do get how appealing the lazier and far more arrogant approach of "I didn't read it and I don't have to in order to know it's bad" stance you chose must be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kari Lake still ‘contemplating’ Senate bid in Arizona

 

Arizona Republican Kari Lake is still “contemplating” a run for the Senate in 2024, the former gubernatorial candidate said Sunday.

 

“There is speculation that you are going to run for the Senate. Are you going to be announcing that soon?” Fox News host Maria Bartiromo asked Lake during an interview on “Sunday Morning Futures With Maria Bartiromo.”

 

“I’m contemplating it,” Lake replied. “I mean, I could go off and go back into media and make a fortune, but this is not the season for that,” the former TV news anchor said.

 

Lake, an outspoken supporter of former President Donald Trump, met with several members of the Senate GOP’s campaign arm in May to talk about possibly running for the seat now held by Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat-turned-independent. Sinema is running for reelection in 2024, and already faces competition on the left from Rep. Ruben Gallego, who announced his bid in January.

 

Click on the link for the full article

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Califan007 The Constipated said:

lol...I should have remembered your description of what you claimed caused the J6 riots.

Donald trump and his people riling everyone up by lying to them that their country was being stolen from them, and sending them to the Capitol to break in and stop the certification?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, China said:

Kari Lake still ‘contemplating’ Senate bid in Arizona

 

Arizona Republican Kari Lake is still “contemplating” a run for the Senate in 2024, the former gubernatorial candidate said Sunday.

 

“There is speculation that you are going to run for the Senate. Are you going to be announcing that soon?” Fox News host Maria Bartiromo asked Lake during an interview on “Sunday Morning Futures With Maria Bartiromo.”

 

“I’m contemplating it,” Lake replied. “I mean, I could go off and go back into media and make a fortune, but this is not the season for that,” the former TV news anchor said.

 

Lake, an outspoken supporter of former President Donald Trump, met with several members of the Senate GOP’s campaign arm in May to talk about possibly running for the seat now held by Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat-turned-independent. Sinema is running for reelection in 2024, and already faces competition on the left from Rep. Ruben Gallego, who announced his bid in January.

 

Click on the link for the full article

 

 

"Contemplating" = "Keep sending me money"

 

 

1 minute ago, tshile said:

Donald trump and his people riling everyone up by lying to them that their country was being stolen from them, and sending them to the Capitol to break in and stop the certification?

 

 

More like "because he lost the election" lol...

 

Unless that was not you, in which case a thousand pardons. No pun intended.

Edited by Califan007 The Constipated
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Califan007 The Constipated said:

More like "because he lost the election" lol...

 

Unless that was not you, in which case a thousand pardons. No pun intended.

Yeah you’ve got me confused with someone else. 
 

your bias is showing

 

at least you’re consistent in speaking with authority but being wrong 👍

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tshile said:

Yeah you’ve got me confused with someone else. 
 

your bias is showing

 

at least you’re consistent in speaking with authority but being wrong 👍

 

Ironically enough, while looking to see who did say that, I found this:

 

"...they form their opinions as a knee jerk reaction to a new story. By definition these are uninformed opinions. And because people are so afraid to ever admit they were wrong, they defend those uninformed opinions to death." -tshile

 

Forming an opinion based on an uninformed knee-jerk reaction to a news story they didn't read...and then being too afraid to admit they were wrong, they just double down.

 

I cannot wait for your disingenuous reply lol...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Eminem tells Vivek Ramaswamy to not use his songs on campaign trail
 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/08/28/eminem-tells-vivek-ramaswamy-not-use-his-songs-campaign-trail/

 

Quote

Republican presidential hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy gave an impromptu performance of Eminem’s “Lose Yourself” onstage during a campaign event in Iowa earlier this month.

 

But the Grammy-winning hip-hop artist wants that to be the political newcomer’s only performance — at least when it comes to Eminem’s music. Nearly two weeks after Ramaswamy showed off his rapping skills at the Iowa State Fair, Eminem asked Ramaswamy’s campaign to not do that again.


 

C’mon epic diss track. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 4
  • Super Duper Ain't No Party Pooper Two Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...