Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Jumbo

By Jumbo
in The Tailgate

 Share

Recommended Posts

SoulSkin

SoulSkin

Posted
Posted (edited)
On 2/3/2018 at 7:34 PM, visionary said:
 

 

 

 

Here's a youtube vid of him speaking in Russia in July, 2016. It's pretty dull, but towards the two minute mark, he explains how he's there as a private citizen, and not to take his comments as a reflection of other people or organizations that he may be working with at the present time. He also talks about having been there in a similar capacity over the past decade. He goes on, touting investor-class actions of Russian and Chinese entities, what we pay attention to in our news in the west, western philosophy regarding "regime change" in former Soviet territories, and on and on. Just curious what people smarter than me think of it, if they can bear to watch. Is this just a niche career that this guy fell into and he's really a nobody, or maybe he's that and he happens to be a "useful idiot", or is he like an actual spy?  This guy is a walking, talking example of someone who most definitely should have been under surveillance. I just saw a tweet of it with a little snippet from Scott Dworkin, and started watching.

 

I'm just linking it. It's around 40 minutes long.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CYF29saA9w

 

Edited by SoulSkin
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hersh

Hersh

Posted
Posted
19 hours ago, visionary said:
 

 

 

 

 

DT Jr is scared to death that he is going to be indicted. 

 

Big day today to see if any GOP member of the house intelligence agency vote with the Dems to release their memo or if they will protect POTUS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LadySkinsFan

LadySkinsFan

Posted
Posted

So Trump releases the Nunes memo on Friday of Superbowl weekend and landed as a big egg. 

 

If Schiff's memo is voted to be released sometime this week, it's projected to rebut the Nunes memo and it's ten pages long. It will be discussed for days. 

 

Trump really miscalculated this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bozo the kKklown

Bozo the kKklown

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, SoulSkin said:

 

Here's a youtube vid of him speaking in Russia in July, 2016. It's pretty dull, but towards the two minute mark, he explains how he's there as a private citizen, and not to take his comments as a reflection of other people or organizations that he may be working with at the present time. He also talks about having been there in a similar capacity over the past decade. He goes on, touting investor-class actions of Russian and Chinese entities, what we pay attention to in our news in the west, western philosophy regarding "regime change" in former Soviet territories, and on and on. Just curious what people smarter than me think of it, if they can bear to watch. Is this just a niche career that this guy fell into and he's really a nobody, or maybe he's that and he happens to be a "useful idiot", or is he like an actual spy?  This guy is a walking, talking example of someone who most definitely should have been under surveillance. I just saw a tweet of it with a little snippet from Scott Dworkin, and started watching.

 

I'm just linking it. It's around 40 minutes long.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1CYF29saA9w

 

here is the passage in question

 

 

 

Please believe the Feds had this in 4k, Blu-Ray, the day after he made this speech.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Llevron

Llevron

Posted
Posted

Notice Nunes trying to frame the FBI as having abused its power to pick on Papadopolous because he "Got drunk and said he didnt like Hillary Clinton" 

 

I cant believe anyone with a shred of intelligence left in them would actually vote republican every again. These people clearly think you are an idiot that will vote for them regardless. All of the republican values are bull****. Every single one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dan T.

Dan T.

Posted
Posted (edited)

I'm sure a White House staffer who is "loyal," is "on the team," and who voted the right way will feel totally free to give a non-partisan opinion to Trump on whether the Democratic memo should be released.

 

 

Trump's tweet this morning about Adam Schiff being a "leaker" sets the stage for blocking the release of the Democratic rebuttal, and then subsequently crying "LEAK" whenever Schiff says ANYTHING to refute the absurd GOP memo.

 

Edited by Dan T.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...