MadMonkey Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Well the picks were handed out this evening and 32 compensatory draft picks awarded to 16 clubs. Atlanta & Baltimore awarded most with 4 each while both philly and the giants get a 7th rounder. Also the Cowboys do not get pick as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Yeah, no reason for us to unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Garcon and Morgan > Landry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Didn't really expect us to. Using ESPN's handy dandy free agent webpage for the 2012 offseason: http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/freeagency/?year=2012&team=28 we added (only counting guys who made the final roster): - Garcon - Morgan - Meriweather - M. Williams - Kehl (sorta, re-upped him mid-season) Meanwhile, we lost (again, counting guys who made other rosters): - Rocky McIntosh - LaRon Landry - Sean Locklear - Donte Stallworth (again, sorta, he played 1 game last season) No one knows the super secret formula the NFL uses to figure out who gets what picks, but we probably wouldn't qualify except under very lax formulas, which would probably work against us since it would mean other teams got even more compensatory picks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Giants got picks even though they didn't lose more people than they signed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
son_sonn Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 For those who didn't see the complete list of the picks 2013 NFL Draft compensatory picks Rd No./Overall Team 3rd round 33/95 Houston Texans 3 34/96 Kansas City Chiefs 3 35/97 Tennessee Titans 4th round 33/130 Baltimore Ravens 4 34/131 San Francisco 49ers 4 35/132 Detroit Lions 4 36/133 Atlanta Falcons 5th round 33/166 Miami Dolphins 5 34/167 Green Bay Packers 5 35/168 Baltimore Ravens 6th round 33/201 Houston Texans 6 34/202 Tennessee Titans 6 35/203 Baltimore Ravens 6 36/204 Kansas City Chiefs 6 37/205 Oakland Raiders 6 38/206 Pittsburgh Steelers 7th round 33/239 Philadelphia Eagles 7 34/240 Cincinnati Bengals 7 35/241 Seattle Seahawks 7 36/242 Seattle Seahawks 7 37/243 Atlanta Falcons 7 38/244 Atlanta Falcons 7 39/245 Detroit Lions 7 40/246 San Francisco 49ers 7 41/247 Baltimore Ravens 7 42/248 Tennessee Titans 7 43/249 Atlanta Falcons 7 44/250 Miami Dolphins 7 45/251 Cincinnati Bengals 7 46/252 San Francisco 49ers 7 47/253 New York Giants 7 48/254 Indianapolis Colts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSkins0721 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Giants got picks even though they didn't lose more people than they signed That's part of the ever changing "Mara ****s the Rest of the NFC East" Rule voted in several years ago. Actually, voted in by Mara and his ****es in 2012. I hate that team, more then words can describe... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Giants got picks even though they didn't lose more people than they signed It's about money, not quantity of players. I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaleighSkinsMann Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 That's part of the ever changing "Mara ****s the Rest of the NFC East" Rule voted in several years ago. Actually, voted in by Mara and his ****es in 2012. I hate that team, more then words can describe... I just wanted to say thank you for taking that out of my head and actually saying it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ddub52 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 I blame Mara. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mania Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Giants got picks even though they didn't lose more people than they signed Does that surprise you. I do believe it is the value of the person you lost, not the amount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSO Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Welp, next year we might get some. We lost Lorenzo and might lose Hall and Davis. We're also probably going to lose Chris Wilson, Cedric Griffin, Madeiu Williams and Banks, though I'm not sure those guys are going to help us with comp. picks. You know, looking at all the names on our team that were Free Agents and we kept has made me feel better about this whole thing (guys we re-signed in bold): Chris Cooley Fred Davis Sav Rocca Jordan Black Tyler Polumbus Kory Lichtensteiger Kedric Golston Rob Jackson Lorenzo Alexander Bryan Kehl Chris Wilson Cedric Griffin Madieu Williams Chris Baker Logan Paulsen Darrel Young Brandon Banks Nick Sundberg If we re-sign Davis and Hall I think it's safe to say that we beat the cap penalty since this team is going to go into the 2013 season with the same young roster that just won the NFC East. A young roster that has a lot of guys on it who have yet to reach their primes. But with the exception of Lorenzo Alexander (and maaaaybe Cedric Griffin), I think it's fair to say we signed back all of the guys who were worthy. ---------- Post added March-18th-2013 at 09:44 PM ---------- My God, looking at it again the Ravens get a 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th. Wow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DogofWar1 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 My God, looking at it again the Ravens get a 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th. Wow. They're going to get a half-dozen 3rd rounders next year the way things are going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSO Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 They're going to get a half-dozen 3rd rounders next year the way things are going. I'm starting to think they have the secret sauce the NFL uses to come up with this number and just let their guys go. Shoot, it's worth it when you get this many picks. Who did they lose last year? ---------- Post added March-18th-2013 at 10:02 PM ---------- I just keep getting angrier every time any news comes out lately because of that damn cap penalty. Like you said, they're going to be awarded a ton of picks next year AND WE DON'T EVEN GET THE BENEFIT OF SIGNING ANY OF THEIR GUYS. ARGGHH.... Think about this now. All these teams are getting compensatory picks because they lost players via Free Agency. Players WE COULDN'T REALLY GO AFTER. So we don't benefit because we can't go after as many FAs as we'd like but we also get screwed in that every single round we have a pick in after the 3rd round is going to have less of a choice of players on our board relating to the amount of compensatory picks awarded. Ok, that was a hard sentence to read, I know. Let me make it easier: For instance, our 4th round pick will miss out on the 3 players taken by the Texans, Chiefs and Titans. And we all know the Texans target similar players that we do. Did we get any Free Agents from those 3 teams last year? Nope. Our 5th round picks will have 4 players taken off our boards by the 49ers, Ravens, Lions and Falcons. The only Free Agent we signed from those teams was Morgan, and I don't think that's why the 49ers got awarded that pick. This cap penalty is hurting us in so many ways it's so damn frustrating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZRagone Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Who did they lose last year? Grubbs, Zbikowski, Johnson, Redding, Nakamura Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve09ru Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 I don't like the idea of compensatory picks anyway. As someone else above mentioned, how in the hell can one team gain an additional 3, 4, 5, 6 pick?! They lost Grubbs who they spent a late first on, got 5 strong years out of and because he left they get a 3rd? Nakamura is a 6th round pick who has had multiple injuries and they get equal or greater pick than what he was picked at? Zbikowski just got released by the team that picked him up yet the Ravens get compensated for him? Redding went to his 3rd team in 3 years with the Ravens and they get a comp pick for him too? Johnson was a 4th round pick who they got 9 years out of but the league says "sure let's give you what you got him for even though he only has a couple years left in the tank" - thats some competitive advantage if I've ever seen it. Falcons got comp. picks for 2 guys that were with other teams for a string of years before and were only with them for 1 year? /End of rant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Competitive balance only applies for teams that don't wear Burgundy and Gold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighOnHendrix Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Something I've always wondered: can you trade comp picks or are you stuck with them? It would make sense if you were, what with the reasoning behind handing them out and all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santana_4_prez Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Something I've always wondered: can you trade comp picks or are you stuck with them? It would make sense if you were, what with the reasoning behind handing them out and all. You cannot trade them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC9 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Something I've always wondered: can you trade comp picks or are you stuck with them? It would make sense if you were, what with the reasoning behind handing them out and all. You cannot trade comp picks. EDIT: santa4prez beat me to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 I've never understood this process. Why should the Ravens get so many draft picks in compensation because their strategy is to never pay anyone or because they mismanaged their cap and lost 10 players this year? That doesn't make any sense to reward them for that. Let them refill with their regular picks and sort through the trash heap to fill out their roster like other teams do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kostaskins Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 If this is the case for compensery pics then how come we didn't receive anything for what happened to the late Sean Taylor? Like steve09rus said you draft someone he lasts so long and then loose him to free agency and bam... So if that's the case we lost Taylor and got jack.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve09ru Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 I've never understood this process. Why should the Ravens get so many draft picks in compensation because their strategy is to never pay anyone or because they mismanaged their cap and lost 10 players this year? That doesn't make any sense to reward them for that. Let them refill with their regular picks and sort through the trash heap to fill out their roster like other teams do. Agreed - if you're going to give away free picks then at least have a better method where you are not rewarding a team for faults of their own. If they want to make-up for those losses and make things more competitive then only allow compensation picks for teams that a. didn't make the playoffs or b. had under a .500 record Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighOnHendrix Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 You cannot trade them. You cannot trade comp picks.EDIT: santa4prez beat me to it. Thanks, guys. Glad that's how it is, too - it just makes sense. ---------- Post added March-19th-2013 at 08:02 PM ---------- Agreed - if you're going to give away free picks then at least have a better method where you are not rewarding a team for faults of their own. If they want to make-up for those losses and make things more competitive then only allow compensation picks for teams that a. didn't make the playoffs or b. had under a .500 record That's a really good idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drowland Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I've never understood this process. Why should the Ravens get so many draft picks in compensation because their strategy is to never pay anyone or because they mismanaged their cap and lost 10 players this year? That doesn't make any sense to reward them for that. Let them refill with their regular picks and sort through the trash heap to fill out their roster like other teams do. I don't know the complete formula, but I know it factors in regular season record not playoffs. The Ravens were 12-4 in 2011 and dropped to 10-6 in 2012. Cory Redding and Tom Zbikowski going to the Colts and their record improving to 11-5 from 2-14 the year before probably played a big part. The Ravens winning the Super Bowl is a none factor. In Landry's case he signed with Jets who were worse and the Skins improved their record by 5 games, so no compensatory draft pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.