Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

WT: Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress


SnyderShrugged

Recommended Posts

This just sets my alarms off in a big way

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/feb/7/coming-to-a-sky-near-you/

Look! Up in the sky! Is it a bird? Is it a plane? It’s … a drone, and it’s watching you. That’s what privacy advocates fear from a bill Congress passed this week to make it easier for the government to fly unmanned spy planes in U.S. airspace.

The FAA Reauthorization Act, which President Obama is expected to sign, also orders the Federal Aviation Administration to develop regulations for the testing and licensing of commercial drones by 2015.

Privacy advocates say the measure will lead to widespread use of drones for electronic surveillance by police agencies across the country and eventually by private companies as well.

“There are serious policy questions on the horizon about privacy and surveillance, by both government agencies and commercial entities,” said Steven Aftergood, who heads the Project on Government Secrecy at the Federation of American Scientists.

more at link

---------- Post added February-8th-2012 at 01:09 PM ----------

It brought this thread to mind too

http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?354499-WaPo-A-future-for-drones-Automated-killing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, i guess i just dont see the big deal. I mean hopefully it will help Police and what not.

Its not like they can see into our house or anything. Usually when you're outside just about anyone can see what you're doing. IDK

I have a close friend who flies drones and he told me that back in 2000, he could read the side of a coffee cup inside a house through a window.

This kind of stuff is totally against what our nation is supposed to be all about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's with all the complaining?

The bill is intended to "streamline" the process of spying on American citizens without proper authorization (slight sarcasm).

That means less waste which means cutting government spending. How can anyone be opposed to this?

I would be most interested how 1.) proper authorization from the judicial branch (warrant, court order, etc) is included in utilization of these for active surveillanance (i.e. imaging of a specific thing), and 2.) whether anything captured via a 'passive application' (i.e. we werent specifically watching for you robbing a bank, but we saw it anyways) can be admitted as evidence in a court proceeding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...