Rypien1191 Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 We wouldn't take Newton at #7. It would have to be a trade down where we use an extra pick on him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SMOSS89 Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 Don't forget Jake Locker. Shanny loved Cutler when he was the third best QB prospect in the 2006 draft and traded up for him. He could do the same for Locker, who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailGreen28 Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 TK managed to state the obvious in a format that conveys some sort of inside knowledge.neat. How about I just state the obvious for everyone and skip the clouded secrecy part... Mike likes Andrew Luck. If we can't move up to get him.. then McNabb may stick around unless they are impressed by Grossman enough to stick with him. LOL. You'd have to be proven right next draft. Trust me. If you go back and look at TK's old posts (Click on TK's name, click on "Find all posts"), the man is money. Whatever his knowledge/sources are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rypien1191 Posted December 20, 2010 Share Posted December 20, 2010 LOL. You'd have to be proven right next draft. Trust me. If you go back and look at TK's old posts (Click on TK's name, click on "Find all posts"), the man is money. Whatever his knowledge/sources are. Except for Randy Moss, that is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsnshanny Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 . Shanny will play mind games with opponents. Right now, he's got a serious Jedi Mind **** going on between Jason Garrett's ears. Hopefully he neither confirms nor denies anything the rest of the week. Hmmmm, i think the only question left is does Beck get any reps in week 17....not sure what else there is to understand. Not so jedi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 Hmmmm, i think the only question left is does Beck get any reps in week 17....not sure what else there is to understand. Not so jedi Dude, let it die. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HigSkin Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 TK managed to state the obvious in a format that conveys some sort of inside knowledge.neat. How about I just state the obvious for everyone and skip the clouded secrecy part... Mike likes Andrew Luck. If we can't move up to get him.. then McNabb may stick around unless they are impressed by Grossman enough to stick with him. There's another guy who may require movement up and that's Gabbert. We don't know if either is coming out but I could see Gabbert in the top 7 considering QB need with teams up there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveakl Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 IF Shanny can't get the QB he's been watching a lot of film on in the Draft, then that ups the chance of McNabb returning. Though Shanny does have his eye on someone in the Draft, it just depends on if we cam be able to move up to get him. Was that a typo or does he really like Cam? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 Was that a typo or does he really like Cam? It was just the "m" being next to the "n" on the keyboard. It should read, " . . . it just depends on if we can be able to move up to get him." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rypien1191 Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 It was just the "m" being next to the "n" on the keyboard. It should read, " . . . it just depends on if we can be able to move up to get him." You're being sarcastic, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoRUSupposed2Be Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 TK does like to throw in a little haywire to give off static for us daily Extremers Until TK claims that it was a typo, then we can only presume that Cam is the guy they're looking at for this type of offense. One thing needs to be considered, the Shanahans need to make sure that he's not a younger version of McNabb and more mature version Schaub (sp?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 "we are able". You are murdering the king's english! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 TK does like to throw in a little haywire to give off static for us daily Extremers Here's another post from TK. Read it carefully for clues. Hmmm.... With any Luck, Shanahan can Ponder seeing the name of his favorite quarterback on a Locker at Redskins Park. I'll bet a package of fig Newtons on it. Hopefully he will learn from Pryor mistakes, and make a decision that won't have ES members wanting to hit him over the head with a Mallett. Over course the Devlin is in the details. Some players he covets and others he wouldn't touch with a 10 foot Tyrod. But the speculation and jibber Gabbert will continue until draft day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheismannQuote Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 Here's another post from TK. Read it carefully for clues. Hmmm.... "...wouldn't touch with a 10 foot Tyrod" Gold...especially for a guy from Roanoke. That's damn near blasphemy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhoRUSupposed2Be Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 Here's another post from TK. Read it carefully for clues. Hmmm.... Well, he's to hoping that Shanahan doesn't become some sort of unbearable "Gross" man and forces us to ride around in his mini "Dona" van" for the next couple of years Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsnshanny Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 Dude, let it die. :doh: Let what die? The opening post to this thread is a joke but i dont think it was intended to be one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted December 29, 2010 Share Posted December 29, 2010 Let what die?The opening post to this thread is a joke but i dont think it was intended to be one His point is it didn't need to be bumped, for any reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.