Soup Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 didn't know Jason Reid had a brother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 Shades of 05 when we were considered the worst 3-0 team in NFL history. Playoffs that year. It's looking good if theres truth to trends. But furthermore, it seems as if he didn't watch the game. The reason Dallas reverted to the pass instead of the run is that, while they had a nice average per run, it was padded by a couple long runs by Felix Jones early in the game. Other than a couple blown assignments, the Redskins were stopping many run plays for a loss or small gain. Garret knew we had adjusted and the run game wasn't working as well anymore. He went to the pass and we covered that pretty well. Additionally, if we weren't getting constant pressure, then we wouldn't have seen as many penalties by Dallas. Additionally, getting one sack against Romo sits to pee probably indicates decent pressure since he is good at escaping. Come on. Don't think they could "revert" to the run. The run game is only really established in the modern NFL when you are playing from in front and they never were. The early runs simply were done to prevent us from pinning our ears back. Dallas wants to put you down on the mat and then finish with the run. We were never knocked down so they really just never got to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 1-16 huh, I guess thats all we had for the season last Sunday night, I can't wait till the offseason so we can win the dayum Super Bowl again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 How exactly does a team go 1-16 with a 16 game schedule?lmao Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarrellsMyHero28 Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I bet he thinks the reason why we're so bad is because we have a white head coach. Or because our center is white. The dude is one of the absolute worst "sports writers" in the country, and he's a total race-baiter. Don't pay attention to anything he says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegadeTK Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 How exactly does a team go 1-16 with a 16 game schedule? haha... my thoughts exactly. made me think of my favorite donnie darko scene. "please tell me whitlock, how does one go 1 and 16" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DIhwWTHcG0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeThreeKingsRuleU Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I think I agree with most posters here when I say: With an Offense game plan that consisted of screens, and three step drops, and three holding penalities ACTUALLY CALLED, that it's no wonder that we were actually able to record a sack. I believe the cowboys started throwing screens and dump offs to the flat on their first three plays from scrimage. That may have thrown Haslett for a loop, I knew it threw me. I was surprised that the Cowboys weren't so ****y that they thought that even that patchwork o-line could stand up to our rush. Instead they started doing whatever they could, from the beginning, to get the ball out as soon as possible. That plus Haslett drew up a TON of DB blitzes (more than we have seen in awhile) and I don't think this was the best game-planned professional football game ever played. The rest of the season will shake out to be Low scoring/Low yardage for our opponents, with more sacks provided the opposition doesn't hold 95% of the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeThreeKingsRuleU Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 I dare say (and don't flame me for this) but that game had a feel of...almost an extension of pre-season. I mean, think about it: the rotation of the oline (yes probably a standard Shanny, ZBS, move) the crazy, untested Haslett plays (1 down linemen, corner blitzes from buchanon) ALOT of stuff never tried before, knocking the rust off...kicking it from 49 with relatively young/untested kicker. Plus let's not forgot how sloppy it was, what with all the penalities and all (the skins had their fair share, IIRC) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
colkilla Posted September 16, 2010 Share Posted September 16, 2010 they got plenty of pressure on the 5 and seven step drops, problem is, dallas was so scared of the skins rush/their own offensive line that they threw mostly 1 and 3 step drops... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grego Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Romo sits to pee got 282 yards on 31/47. He averaged 6 yards per completion. He wasn't lighting them up. i think thats 9 yards per completion. still, not good. last year, the worst team in the league averaged 8.6 (rams). no other team was under 9. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LetThePointsSoar Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 1. Redskins' Jim Zorn: Doesn't get near enough credit for turning Jason Campbell into a legitimate starting quarterback. Campbell was headed toward being a draft bust before Zorn arrived. Last year Todd Collins saved Washington's season filling in for Campbell late. This season Campbell is completing 64 percent of his passes and has avoided the big mistakes while leading the Skins to a 6-3 start in the league's best division. - Whitlockim not even sure i can lol at that. Nice find BLC. Whitlock is a ****ing moron. "It’s a bad team. The Redskins will finish closer to 1-16 than 8-8."???? What a dumbass - not to mention anyone who saw the game knows the 1 sack doesn't tell the story about Rak getting held all NIGHT, not just the last play of the game. Hate all they want, we're making some serious noise and we damn sure aren't finishing 8-8 or worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apiah Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Well I have to say that I agree with Witlock that i dont like the pressure that the Redskins had on Tony Romo sits to pee and its seems like our D-line nevcer just completely takes over the backfield like Dallas did on a couple of plays too Mcnabb. I do disagree with him that we gave the Cowboys the game and i do disagree with what he states our record will be. That was just uncalled for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.A.C.O.L.B. Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 I didn't realize that Whitlock actually watched games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SittingBull Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Dude didn't even watch the game. One of those guys that just looks at stats and highlights and comes to his own wild conclusions to get page hits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Whitlock is witless. ONE GAME decides seasons? :laugh: ONE GAME determines if a qb, rb or defense can play? :laugh: Really? I have been watching the NFL since 1971/72 and the opening day game is often a REVERSE barometer on how certain clubs are going to do. Anyone remember the Cowboys going 0-2 and then winning the Super Bowl? Anyone remember the Redskins losing the 1983 opener to Dallas 30-31 and still going on to post a 14-2 regular season record? Whitlock should know better. You have to give teams I would say 8 games before we really start to see what they are capable of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Who cares if it was one game. The reality is that even that ONE game shows his article to be bull ****. 17 QB pressures. 1 Sack. 4 Holding calls. That's not consistent pressure? Really? The Cowboys throwing screens, dump-offs, and quick throws all night wasn't because of pressure? :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bulldog Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Whitlock seems to think if it's not a Umenyiora vs. Winston Justice mauling on the line, then the defense isn't applying the necessary pressure Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kindred Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 According to whitlock, we're going to lose them all. We may have technically won one, but it doesnt really count so it should be counted as a loss as well. Hence 1-16 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubbs Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 421, that's an awesome sig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4life88 Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Why do the Media keep saying that Dallas handed us the victory. A win is a win... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ned Flanders Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Jason Dicklock is a frickin moron - what else needs to be said? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hailskins11 Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 According to whitlock, we're going to lose them all. We may have technically won one, but it doesnt really count so it should be counted as a loss as well. Hence 1-16 haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobDigi Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 no consistent pressure, only consistent holding penalties Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maskedsuperstar Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 Well I have to say that I agree with Witlock that i dont like the pressure that the Redskins had on Tony Romo sits to pee and its seems like our D-line nevcer just completely takes over the backfield like Dallas did on a couple of plays too Mcnabb. I do disagree with him that we gave the Cowboys the game and i do disagree with what he states our record will be. That was just uncalled for. Did you watch the game with Jason Whitlock? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKiNz Jus 2 sick Posted September 17, 2010 Share Posted September 17, 2010 really im tired of all the excuses for the cowboys because if you realize we played the cowboys in a very similar game last year and on the last play Romo sits to pee got out the pocket and threw a TD pass with 2 O-linemen illigally downfield and no refs called it and everyone was saying it shouldnt have came down to that and how bad we were now this time it comes down to the last play and now everyone is saying how lucky we were that there was a holding call dosnt matter how you look at it the redskins will always have haters everywhere we go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.