Dana87 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Broncos | Not expected to re-sign Hamilton Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:03:40 -0800 Frank Schwab, of the Colorado Springs Gazette, reports the Denver Broncos are not expected to re-sign impending free-agent OG Ben Hamilton. http://www.kffl.com/hotw/nfl Signing Hamilton could help the Redskins O-Line depth by getting a OG that already knows the zone blocking system that Coach Shanahan will install this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 He may but he's 32 and will be 33 when the season starts. Questionable. He doesn know the system though and has been very durable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mond Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 He may but he's 32 and will be 33 when the season starts. Questionable. He doesn know the system though and has been very durable. If the Redskins implement Shanahan's zone blocking scheme, he would know the system better than anyone else. Also, if he was brought in, Hamilton would be a starter not just "depth." If that's what the OP meant, then sorry...I misunderstood you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 He'd be a stopgap until Shanahan develops his line. I think we all know that signing him would be a part of the transition, as compared to the quick fix FA signings of the past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Stop gap, but not a bad idea. :whoknows: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 The only concern again is age at 33 but the guy can play, no doubt. I wouldn't have any heartburn over us bringing him in on a 1 or 2 year deal until the youngers could play the position(s). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bushwack Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Stop gap, but not a bad idea.:whoknows: I know the Skins o-line needs to get younger, but if the Skins bring him in and he's playing better than the youngsters then I'm all for it until Shanahan can find a younger guard to mold into his zone blocking system. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
styx491 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 We could definitely sign him for now, I'm sure he'll be better than anyone we have on the roster next year to be playing. And this makes this draft less of a pressure cooker for finding good o-linemen, since we have a good young center/guard now and this guy, who can probably play for another 2 years and play better than average. Gives us time to find more linemen and groom them before putting them in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs Hog Heaven Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 All things considered, that would be a pretty prudent move to make for the interim. Hail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mond Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 We could definitely sign him for now, I'm sure he'll be better than anyone we have on the roster next year to be playing. And this makes this draft less of a pressure cooker for finding good o-linemen, since we have a good young center/guard now and this guy, who can probably play for another 2 years and play better than average. Gives us time to find more linemen and groom them before putting them in. Agreed 100%. Ben Hamilton will come in and be one of our best o-linemen immediately, but not for much longer. Develop the youngsters beneath him, and let Ben help the transition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atlass Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 If the Redskins implement Shanahan's zone blocking scheme, he would know the system better than anyone else.Also, if he was brought in, Hamilton would be a starter not just "depth." If that's what the OP meant, then sorry...I misunderstood you. Not only would Hamilton be a good coach for the OL he can also play all three interior line positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ADF Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Not only would Hamilton be a good coach for the OL he can also play all three interior line positions. Has he ever started at center for an extended period? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kindred Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Hell, we can bring him not only as a starter, but also as a mentor, so even if he's done playing, he could help the younger players out with guidance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atlass Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Has he ever started at center for an extended period? No, but all he played in college was Center. He started out as a guard in Denver because Schlereth retired. I think eventually Shanny was going to move him to C,but he did such a good job at G he thought better of it. He could be a backup Center for the Skins. He took a few snaps there over the years but not many. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dahibachi Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 i agree and i think he will actually be a FA target for the Skins'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
texasthunder Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Looks like a good pick up if we can grab him. Now if we can only find some offensive tackles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morneblade Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Sounds like a good move, lord knows we need capable bodies on the OL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tml6157 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I love the idea. I know he is on the wrong side of 30 but he immediately fills Randy's void. Less pressure to take OL at #4. I know we need OTs but Okung at #4 is a reach for me. Ive been reading up on him and watched a game he played in. He runs hot and cold. He isn't a consistent dominant OT. IMO thats not value at #4 its a reach. I wont be mad if we take him because help is needed. I just hope we pass on him and take someone worth of value at #4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Braxford Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 He should be a prime target in FA for the Skins. The Skins need to get younger on the Oline and he is over 30, but he is still a quality player and can help for the next couple of years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 The Redskins must get younger and more athletic. Whether starters or backups, a couple vet OL and a QB familiar with the schemes and terminologies makes the team better! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dead Money Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 So funny how everyone's is into developing our own young players, but the second somebody becomes available with ties, its "sign him sign him!" We might be able to win 9 games in '10!!!! :doh: Patience is a virtue....a virtue that is completely missing in DC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommDownMan Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 So funny how everyone's is into developing our own young players, but the second somebody becomes available with ties, its "sign him sign him!" We might be able to win 9 games in '10!!!! :doh:Patience is a virtue....a virtue that is completely missing in DC. With 5 draft picks we aren't changing the entire line this year. FA needs to be used for depth, especially guys that understand Shannys system. He'll come pretty cheap, so it's a good idea whether he starts or not. Signing guys like Haynesworth or Hall to big contracts is "win now" thoughts. Signing depth guys like Hamilton are hardly because the lack of patience. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildbill1952 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 A 32 year old guy can be depth. He's a lot better depth than we had last year - experienced and durable who already knows the coaching staff. What he should not be considered is a starter. Too old. He can certainly fill in when another guard tweaks an ankle or a knee, or even fill in for a couple of games if the injury is more serious. But don't plan on changing the draft board because you found "depth'. Draft OL. It's the only way to build. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RemoveSnyder Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Alright Hamilton! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff in D.C. Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 He & Rabach are the same age, so we wouldn't be getting any older or younger at the position, but I get the feeling that Hamilton's NFL shelf life is longer than Casey's at this point, and Casey has had too many holding penalties for my taste the last few years. Plus he knows Shanny's system which is a plus, so I certainly wouldn't mind seeing him here. Would he be brought in here as a C or a RG? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.