chipwhich Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 It would be an opinion if I were the person who generated the idea and information. Your flaw in your original post is you say "rumor" then post an opinion without any background as to how it is a rumor. If you stated "someone with knowledge of the situation" and gave some sort of basis behind the rumor it wouldn't be dogged. But the way you wrote the OP, its no more than...Mike Vick is from the area and I think the Redskins might sign him....if he is available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3 Rings Posted September 6, 2009 Author Share Posted September 6, 2009 Your flaw in your original post is you say "rumor" then post an opinion without any background as to how it is a rumor.If you stated "someone with knowledge of the situation" and gave some sort of basis behind the rumor it wouldn't be dogged. But the way you wrote the OP, its no more than...Mike Vick is from the area and I think the Redskins might sign him....if he is available. My apologies...just looking to pass on some credible info....will know better next time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 My apologies...just looking to pass on some credible info....will know better next time. Have you said what it was you heard that would make Pashos "likely" to be on the Redskins' radar??...Because I still haven't seen anything in the OP that gives any reason why this is a rumor instead of just casual speculation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSO Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 3 Rings, you should've stated what you just did about how "...one of the people that I regularly try to keep in touch with has some knowledge of the situation" in the original post. No one is trying to wipe their feet with you, but that is not how you go about making a rumor thread. You had absolutely no basis for what you were saying and didn't even mention an anonymous source. Lighten up my man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgundy Burner Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 To the OP - I hope you are right. I would like to see Pashos in a Redskins uniform. Thanks for the post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 3 Rings, you should've stated what you just did about how "...one of the people that I regularly try to keep in touch with has some knowledge of the situation" in the original post. No one is trying to wipe their feet with you, but that is not how you go about making a rumor thread. You had absolutely no basis for what you were saying and didn't even mention an anonymous source. Lighten up my man. I'm still trying to figure out what "situation" that person has knowledge of lol...is it the knowledge that Pashos might be released??...Or is the the knowledge of the Skins interest in him??...Or is it both...???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4SB Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 It would be nice to do what Jacksonville did this year for next year, draft two bookends. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ouvan59 Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 It would be nice to do what Jacksonville did this year for next year, draft two bookends. And then watch people complain because we neglected position _________. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSO Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 I'm still trying to figure out what "situation" that person has knowledge of lol...is it the knowledge that Pashos might be released??...Or is the the knowledge of the Skins interest in him??...Or is it both...???? lol, I know... but had he at least threw that little nugget in there, the title would've been justified. Even though the rumor would still be extremely weak, and not worthy of following, he could at least label it as one. 3 rings, care to explain this so-called "situation" you're referring to further? We're all ears. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 so we are going to take him as an expensive backup? This sounds a little too good to be true. I'd love to get him if we can because we have nothing behind Heyer and Samuels. Cost shouldn't hold Snyder back from getting a backup tackle. That is seriously the one position on the roster that could end up screwing us over from making the playoffs if the starter goes down. Given the recent injury history of Heyer and Samuels, I'm sweating bullets knowing that Mike Williams is next to go in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 And then watch people complain because we neglected position _________. Actually, at this point with such uncertainty about Samuels's longevity (NOT forcing him out, just preparing for his journey towards retirement) and right tackle in general, I wouldn't mind that. I know that this class isn't nearly as tackle heavy, but I would honestly not mind looking at a linebacker and three or four offensive lineman, tackles included, for next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 This sounds a little too good to be true. I'd love to get him if we can because we have nothing behind Heyer and Samuels. Cost shouldn't hold Snyder back from getting a backup tackle. That is seriously the one position on the roster that could end up screwing us over from making the playoffs if the starter goes down. Given the recent injury history of Heyer and Samuels, I'm sweating bullets knowing that Mike Williams is next to go in the game. Agreed. Give this man a one-year deal yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 Actually, at this point with such uncertainty about Samuels's longevity (NOT forcing him out, just preparing for his journey towards retirement) and right tackle in general, I wouldn't mind that. I know that this class isn't nearly as tackle heavy, but I would honestly not mind looking at a linebacker and three or four offensive lineman, tackles included, for next year. It all depends on the underclassmen who decide to declare. If guys like Bulaga and Anthony Davis decide to come out early, then the class will be as deep as last years with more quality in the late first and second round. It would absolutely kick ass to be able to draft a guy like Bulaga in the first and then a RT prospect like Ciron Black in the second. It would go a loooong way towards making our OL look promising again. Next year's class will be tremdously strong. No matter which way we decide to go, we should have lots of great options. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskinsrmylyfe Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 My apologies...just looking to pass on some credible info....will know better next time.. Thnx 4 any lil info u can give. Don't worry bout this so called fans who think that just cause they post on here 50 times a day that they know more than every one else and stomp on any rumor that they didn't post or find out about first. They're just a bunch of pocket protecter wearing,frontoffice hating,no girl friend having nerds and this web sites all they have. They do break news fast so that's why I keep comin back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aREDSKIN Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 Tony Pashos, who started all 16 games at right tackle, was cut Saturday by the Jaguars, who also released starting cornerback Brian Williams and traded for a backup quarterback, Luke McCown http://jacksonville.com/sports/football/jaguars/2009-09-05/story/jaguars_cut_pashos_brian_williams_deal_for_backup_qb Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dswerdlw Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 I've looked over the cuts from all the teams, and Pashos makes the most sense for us. The only other tackle of consequence to be cut is McIntosh from KC. Pashos has had a much better career so far. We should make the push for Pashos, I hope. Then we keep Pashos, Rinehart, Montgomery, M Williams, and E. Williams. Batiste goes to the PS. I'd rather cut M. Williams, but that seems out of the realm of possibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 i hope this is true, this would be a good pick up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbws Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 Sorry, but how exactly is this a rumor?? It sounds more like your opinion... If you haven't heard a rumor by 9:30, start one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CommanderDOOM Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 If lookin for sloppy seconds , we need to also check teams that have traditionally good OL's where it would be hard for even good players to make their team. Vikings, Titans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDarb Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 Pashos is better than Heyer. He's a much better run blocker and almost as good a pass protector. I'd say bring him in as a starter and have Heyer backup both tackle positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam291 Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 And then watch people complain because we neglected position _________. I don't think so since o-line is the only position we have neglected over the past couple years. Defense is pretty much set. We got some receivers and TEs, Mason made the team, so the only place we never really went after hard was the o-line. Dock was nice, but using a couple picks on a guard that doesn't look very good and an UDFA isn't enough. We need to invest some picks and money into adding some quality youth into the line. Even if the line does well this year, it's time to look for future replacements for Samuels, Rabach, Thomas and maybe still Heyer. Pashos would make me feel better about depth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGhost Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 Pashos is better than Heyer. He's a much better run blocker and almost as good a pass protector. I'd say bring him in as a starter and have Heyer backup both tackle positions. nice idea, but pashos really doesn't know our schemes as of now... i think we bring him on a 1 year contract to keep heyer focused on keeping his starting job (and provide a solid backup).... and then take the plunge on some solid oline pickups in the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDarb Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 nice idea, but pashos really doesn't know our schemes as of now... i think we bring him on a 1 year contract to keep heyer focused on keeping his starting job (and provide a solid backup).... and then take the plunge on some solid oline pickups in the draft I should have been more clear. I don't think he could start for us week 1, but given a couple weeks of learning we'd be better off with Pashos starting come October. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dent19 Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 I thought this when i saw he didnt come to terms (lower his salary...) he's a free agent... Go Dan, Go... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGhost Posted September 6, 2009 Share Posted September 6, 2009 I should have been more clear. I don't think he could start for us week 1, but given a couple weeks of learning we'd be better off with Pashos starting come October. gotcha... i think everyone is in agreement this would be a good pickup... i'm not too trusting of mike williams at this point Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.