Califan007 The Constipated Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 That's a ringing endorsement.Tomorrow is going to see a global cataclysm triggered by a supercomputer defense system becoming self-aware that causes thousands of years of societal regression where the few remaining humans are forced into hunting-gathering and hiding from the menacing suzerainty of their robotic overlords who are bent on exterminating them -- possibly. DAMN that Colt Brennan! :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyvern Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Skins release Daniel? That's a major surprise!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buck812 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I wonder if ARE could run the offense. Hopefully He wont have to! This is a scary move.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipwhich Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Redskins shelve Brennan, will cut Daniel LOL See my post earlier. Colt and Chase will never be starters in this league. My prediction is this keeps an extra slot for Marcus Mason, who by the way will be inactive each week and will never be a starter in this league either, OR, the Skins have their eye on a couple of the QB's they expect to be cut....like a Sage Rosenfels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 The Redskins plan to put backup quarterback Colt Brennan on the injured reserve list, Redskins.com’s Larry Weisman has learned. The popular second-year player has been fighting a nagging hamstring injury that he reaggravated against Jacksonville on Thursday night. An MRI exam revealed a tear of the hamstring. Brennan also has a hip injury. "He could be out for a while with his hamstring," head coach Jim Zorn told Weisman. "He’s a guy we need to get rehabbed. For us, it’s an opportunity to not keep putting a Band-Aid on it." Zorn informed Brennan of the decision on Friday but the planned move came too late to be sent to the NFL by the 4 p.m. ET deadline for transactions. The Redskins would still have to make a decision about whether or not rookie free agent Chase Daniel should be the No. 3 QB or whether he might be released and brought back to the practice squad. Todd Collins is the primary backup to starter Jason Campbell. The Redskins, like all NFL teams, need to be at 53 players, from the current 75, by 6 p.m. ET. Brennan struggled through parts of preseason, throwing three interceptions including one that was returned 99 yards for a touchdown. He finished strong in the preseason finale in Jacksonville, completing 10-of-14 passes for 83 yards and leading the offense on a touchdown drive. He reaggravated the hamstring injury in the fourth quarter of the game and did not return. In four preseason games, Brennan completed 23-of-43 passes for 249 yards, one touchdown and three interceptions. He was sacked seven times. His QB rating was 49.5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinz4Life12 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 This thread = Seriously though, we are only carrying to qb' this season. Does this mean the cult gets shut down? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketCitySkins Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Skins release Daniel? That's a major surprise!! I think so, too. Why have Colt and Chase out there in the pre-season games battling for a #3 spot that now doesn't even exist. I remember Zorn talking about how they were competing for the #3 spot and now it's eliminated all together. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcarey032 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Too bad for Chase. I like Colt fine too, but it would have been nice if Chase were able to be on this team either practice squad or whatever. Hopefully Colt's knee gets better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Wait, the title claims Chase is #3 QB, but the article says the Skins "would still have to make a decision" on whether or not they're even keeping him lol... And we need a link :cool: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Wait, the title claims Chase is #3 QB, but the article says the Skins "would still have to make a decision" on whether or not they're even keeping him lol...And we need a link :cool: its changed to uncertain, making the practice squade leaves us NO 3rd string QB. Now I'm really freaking lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte51Coleman Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Just posted on ESPN....I'll bet Daniel goes to the PS. I'll take that bet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimboDaMan Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 So the rumor turned out to be true? That was always a Gibbs maneuver when he had more QBs than he could keep, somebody always came down with an "injury". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark The Homer Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Wait, the title claims Chase is #3 QB, but the article says the Skins "would still have to make a decision" on whether or not they're even keeping him lol...And we need a link :cool: They might be editing it now.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I think so, too. Why have Colt and Chase out there in the pre-season games battling for a #3 spot that now doesn't even exist. I remember Zorn talking about how they were competing for the #3 spot and now it's eliminated all together. Maybe they were battling to see if we should HAVE a #3 QB? lol.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 its changed to uncertain, making the practice squade leaves us NO 3rd string QB. Now I'm really freaking lost. They might be editing it now.... :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1972FAN Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Too bad for Chase. I like Colt fine too, but it would have been nice if Chase were able to be on this team either practice squad or whatever. Hopefully Colt's knee gets better. I was hoping we keep them both, feeling Collins will be gone next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketCitySkins Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Maybe they were battling to see if we should HAVE a #3 QB? lol.. Must have been. Only thing that makes sense now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I don't understand any of this, are we bringing in another 3rd string QB? Or are they making room for one more player to add to the depth chart? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipwhich Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 its changed to uncertain, making the practice squade leaves us NO 3rd string QB. Now I'm really freaking lost. It's another good move in the maturation of Vinnie. We don't need 3 QB's. We need depth and talent at other positions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaGhost Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 It's another good move in the maturation of Vinnie.We don't need 3 QB's. We need depth and talent at other positions. let's hope you're right... that's all i have to say Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mi6 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 This doesn't surprise me. Colt has had hip problems, and the hammy takes time to heal ... Just ask Carlos "mr. butterfingers" Rogers who did not play much of the pre-season. If they do cut Chase, it's clear that he Skins are serious re-evaluating their QB situation. If JC doesn't shine, 2010 I have a feeling we will be drafting multiple QBs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chipwhich Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 let's hope you're right... that's all i have to say Most teams dont keep 3 qb's. Why should we? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yellow41 Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 Props to whoever got the scoop -- gotta admit I was skeptical. Guess this makes ARE the third-stringer. Let's pray there's no repeat of the Body Bag Game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burgundy Burner Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 I don't understand any of this, are we bringing in another 3rd string QB? Or are they making room for one more player to add to the depth chart? It wouldn't surprise me to see us looking for a viable No. 3 on the waiver wires and hope he could replace Collins at No. 2 next year. Josh Johnson quickly comes to mind, but there could be others. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte51Coleman Posted September 5, 2009 Share Posted September 5, 2009 double post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.