Burgold Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 I don't know that you won, but you can accuse him of being unoriginal http://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=278033&highlight=Hixon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegionOfDoom Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Ok, but rookie WR's always take time. The eagles had a rookie WR that did a good job. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TMK9973 Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 I voted you won.... Not because of the argument - but because as a general rule McD5 is always wrong..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 I was under the impression that you had to throw out the first year because they could have been using the talents of their previous WR coach... LoL nah...it was more of a situation of "new team, new start, probably both played a role in Moss kicking ass more than anything having to do with Hixon". So if that's the case, it should apply to Patten's first year with the Saints and Lloyd's first year with the Bears as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegionOfDoom Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 I don't know that you won, but you can accuse him of being unoriginalhttp://www.extremeskins.com/showthread.php?t=278033&highlight=Hixon Damn...dude jacked your thread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 I voted you won.... Not because of the argument - but because as a general rule McD5 is always wrong..... LoL :applause:...Yeah, I tend to live by that rule as well, even though I was agreeing with his doubts on Hixon's coaching abilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tulane Skins Fan Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 The eagles had a rookie WR that did a good job. Good point... based on that, clearly the Eagles have a great WR coach. So, they clearly have had a great WR corps for many, many years. :paranoid: Maybe I'm arguing the original question too much, but I just don't know that we can blame Hixon for rookie WR's not being productive. Honestly, Santana Moss has been much, much better with Hixon than he was pre-Hixon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegionOfDoom Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 LoL :applause:...Yeah, I tend to live by that rule as well, even though I was agreeing with his doubts on Hixon's coaching abilities. Not a bad rule to follow...his Betts love affair is sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegionOfDoom Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Good point... based on that, clearly the Eagles have a great WR coach. So, they clearly have had a great WR corps for many, many years. :paranoid: Hey Reggie Brown has been an animal...and Pinkston!!!!:hysterical: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Good point... based on that, clearly the Eagles have a great WR coach. So, they clearly have had a great WR corps for many, many years. :paranoid: Very good point lol :yes: Honestly, Santana Moss has been much, much better with Hixon than he was pre-Hixon. I think Moss has been pretty consistent both pre-Hixon and with Hixon, actually. Anyway, not to turn this into a thread destined to be moved to the Stadium (lol), I haven't voted either "yes" or "no", because as someone else said the bet is set up so that McD5 can't "lose", but he can't really win, either. If McD's original question is something along the lines of "Can anyone give me a reason why Hixon should not be fired?" then at the very least skinsfan_1215's response of basically saying "It might be impossible for us to know either way" has some validity to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattFancy Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 you all should go over to that thread and read my reply and see what you think. i think mine deserves some consideration... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mad Mike Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 Pretty hard to judge the effectiveness of a WR coach when the QB cant get the ball to a WR. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
renaissance Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 This thread is getting into Stadium territory!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted March 4, 2009 Author Share Posted March 4, 2009 This thread is getting into Stadium territory!! Yeah it really developed into that... It wasn't my intention to start the same discussion that was going on in the original thread. Also, lol at the tags for this thread. Anonymity is a powerful thing, huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HighOnHendrix Posted March 4, 2009 Share Posted March 4, 2009 I voted against you, 1215, purely on the basis that he said himself he was the judge. By definition, that means you can't win. That's like trying to catch smoke with your hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted March 4, 2009 Author Share Posted March 4, 2009 I voted against you, 1215, purely on the basis that he said himself he was the judge. By definition, that means you can't win. That's like trying to catch smoke with your hands. Haha, actually that's a good point. Unwinable sig bets suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 ...and the now deleted "skinsfan1215=idiot" tag netted the creator a brief vacation.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Weirdo Posted March 5, 2009 Share Posted March 5, 2009 I voted for you based on principle. Didn't even read the first post. Good luck. Hope you win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGoodBits Posted March 5, 2009 Author Share Posted March 5, 2009 I voted for you based on principle. Didn't even read the first post. Good luck. Hope you win. lol thanks. Unfortunately, I think HoH made a good point here: I voted against you, 1215, purely on the basis that he said himself he was the judge. By definition, that means you can't win. That's like trying to catch smoke with your hands. McD5 did word it so he could not lose. Lame ass "sig bet" to start. Too bad, I was looking forward to owning his sig for a year... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.