Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

9/11 Conspiracy Film: Loose Change


skinsfan07

Recommended Posts

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE&feature=related

If you haven't seen this yet, I highly recommend it. Proof that 9/11 was an inside job (the plane crash into the Pentagon was definitely set up, less than 5 mins in, it explains it all).......crazy crazy stuff

It's 1hr 19 mins but is worth it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korey_Rowe

A comprehensive list of over 100 lies and omissions in the 911 commission report can be found in this link:

http://www.septembereleventh.org/newsarchive/2005-05-22-571pglie.php

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7E3oIbO0AWE&feature=related

If you haven't seen this yet, I highly recommend it. Proof that 9/11 was an inside job (the plane crash into the Pentagon was definitely set up, less than 5 mins in, it explains it all).......crazy crazy stuff

It's 1hr 19 mins but is worth it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korey_Rowe

A comprehensive list of over 100 lies and omissions in the 911 commission report can be found in this link:

http://www.septembereleventh.org/newsarchive/2005-05-22-571pglie.php

If you have fallen for that, you should punch yourself in the face repeatedly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying terrorists didn't have anything to do with it, but the facts and evidence are all there.

Judge for yourself by watching the vid. Your opinion might change.....IDK just seems odd.

If I slammed my head into a wall for an hour while sniffing glue I would end up smarter than I would if I bothered to watch that video.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I first watched this -- what, more than three years ago by now? -- it very much seemed like the work of a 17 year old and a couple of his buddies.

Starting from that point, it has aged poorly.

The astute viewer will note that at no time in the video do they actually prove anything. It's all a bunch of loosely connected, selectively handpicked pieces of evidence that they try to build into a logical house of cards. They go from asking leading questions to somehow having the answers. The whole thing falls apart with the lightest touch, and for a good reason: it's bunk.

I have a sig image around here for that, somewhere... [wandering off to rummage for the N.O.T.R.E.A.L.I.T.Y. club logo]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not saying terrorists didn't have anything to do with it, but the facts and evidence are all there.

Judge for yourself by watching the vid. Your opinion might change.....IDK just seems odd.

You're a few years late to the party on this one. Loose Change has been out, applauded, debunked, changed, applauded, and then again debunked. There is nothing that this video talks about that hasn't already and thoroughly been debunked!

Check out these as a source of reliable and objective information debunking Loose Change.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html

http://www.popularmechanics.com/blogs/911myths/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I first watched this -- what, more than three years ago by now? -- it very much seemed like the work of a 17 year old and a couple of his buddies.

Starting from that point, it has aged poorly.

The astute viewer will note that at no time in the video do they actually prove anything. It's all a bunch of loosely connected, selectively handpicked pieces of evidence that they try to build into a logical house of cards. They go from asking leading questions to somehow having the answers. The whole thing falls apart with the lightest touch, and for a good reason: it's bunk.

I have a sig image around here for that, somewhere... [wandering off to rummage for the N.O.T.R.E.A.L.I.T.Y. club logo]

The way the buildings fell looks VERY much like the doings of a demolition + the hit of the plane. Think about this, that one plane that first hit had NO EFFECT on the bottom of the building. How is it that one plane causes a building that big to fall STRAIGHT DOWN? If anything, the top of the building which was hit would have fallen to the side or broken off at the top, not crumble all the way down to the ground.

Watch 9:50 -10:15

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The way the buildings fell looks VERY much like the doings of a demolition + the hit of the plane. Think about this, that one plane that first hit had NO EFFECT on the bottom of the building. How is it that one plane causes a building that big to fall STRAIGHT DOWN? If anything, the top of the building which was hit would have fallen to the side or broken off at the top, not crumble all the way down to the ground.

Watch 9:50 -10:15

Do I have to link the NIST study results of this again :doh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My friends Dad who was leaving the city (as thousands were because it was evacuated) on 395 saw the plane flying so low he said that it felt like he could have reached out and touched it through his sunroof.

And I have friends who worked in the Pentagon who saw the entire thing.

My dad saw the plane, heard the explosion and saw the smoke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...