SkinsTight Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 What is the deal with our punting game? I though it was bad all around. It must be because the rookie got butterflies in his leg? It's a C minus for me here. Is it too early to say...bring back Frost? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Btubes18 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Ehh, for a rookie's first game with 7 punts and only being off Frost's Average punt yards last year by a little more than 3 yards. I would say not that bad. I think this kid has some talent. Very first NFL game with a lot of action, and he puts 2 inside the 20 and 3 of his punts were fair catches. He will show improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scruffylookin Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Pretty bad. I do think that Brooks got a little better as the game went on and that fact may save him his job for another week. I was convinced he was going to be "Norved" (Norv always cut the kicker/punter when things went wrong) at halftime. I'm now guessing that he'll get another week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 During the game last night, most of his punts looks shorter than Frost's would have been. When totalled Brooks' punts averaged 37.9 yards per kick. That is less than Frost did last year. I'm not calling for Cerrato's head but what we got so far is "consistant"ly worse than what we gave up. Jes sayin'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benkeiofthehillpeople Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 1st game of career... Meadowlands... national tv... opening game of the NFL season... I'd say he had some butterflies. He seemed to get better as the game went on. Let's give him a few weeks before we cut him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buenosdiaz Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Pretty bad.I do think that Brooks got a little better as the game went on and that fact may save him his job for another week. I was convinced he was going to be "Norved" (Norv always cut the kicker/punter when things went wrong) at halftime. I'm now guessing that he'll get another week. are you serious? he's here for the year dude Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sonny9TD Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Brooks is the real deal. Probably the best draft pick we got. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Yeah, let's give the kid a Mulligan on this game. The whole team walked into a lion's den. That crowd was playoff-charged. I guarantee you he was nervous as hell, but I saw improvement as the game went on. He'll be fine. I predict he'll have some monster kicks at home against New Orleans. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forehead Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Let's not forget that part of Brooks appeal is his hang time. If 3 of the 7 punts were fair catches, I think that's looking pretty good. Also, his long was 53 yards...how often did Frost uncork one like that? Pretty rarely. This kid will be fine. A little less nerves, and a few more games under his belt, and he should be over 40 yards consistently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlayAction Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I would grade the punting as a C. It looked like the punter was emphasizing hang time rather than distance (normally sound approach). He also was trying to get 2 or 3 kicks to fall inside the 20 rather than punting out the end-zone. But a few of the kicks were too short regardless. Inside the 20 punts (B-). I thought he had enough room to hit them closer to the 10 yard line rather than right at the 20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsaddict Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 he looked more comfortable throughout the game. The last punt was a boomer. i'd say this game was no different punting than when frost was here. The upside on this kid is huge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ttr77 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 His leg was probably tired after the first quarter. Still, he needs to pick it up so that Vinny can put 'successful second day draft pick' on his resume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JetSkins Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 just another example of how the redskins have no idea what they are doing in the draft Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jwpanic Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 lets not forget that brooks got very poor protection. it seemed like as soon as he got the ball, a giant was right on top of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsaddict Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 brooks did get a nice 15 year penalty in his favor, took it like a man. speaking of, mr. penalty was our player of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peregrine Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Of course Brooks punts were shorter than Frosts were, because hes kicking for hangtime. Im by no means saying he was lights out last night, but theres only one thing thats important to punting, net yardage. Some people just seem to blindly ignore that because it makes them happy. His net yardage last night was 35. Thats 1 1/2 yards off Frosts average(his best average for any season). His first game and some people are already on him...sheesh. He was not "pretty bad", he was merely just below Frost level(which admittedly is not good). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMetal Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Wow, I absolutely disagree. I thought he was outstanding. He didn't strike me as rattled at all. His punts had good hang time and he didn't hit a bad one all night. I missed most of the first quarter, but from what I saw he was completely respectable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 People are overvaluing yards per punt. It's all about NET. None of Brooks's punts were returned for any significant yardage. He had great hangtime. I'd give him a solid B. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cuchip703 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Frost is gone....signed with G.B. didn't he?? Thank God. Brooks was fine last night. He had one bad kick and one very good kick. His net was only 35 but he did put two inside the 20 as well. Hangtime is key here and net average. Brooks has so much more upside than Frost and will hit a lot more great punts than Frost can ever dream about. Frost was a guarunteed one shank a game punter (usually when punting from inside our 20), Brooks is much more consistent, and will prove it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I thought he was okay. I prefer fair catches to line drive punts for returns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heatman28 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Brooks has excellent hang time and he's far better then Frost. When is the last time any of you seen fair catches from the opposing team??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chef8181 Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Great hang time. They were really coming after him early I'm sure because he's a rookie and he handled the pressure well. Didn't get good distance and never really pinned them deep. A good first game but nothing great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan T. Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 Here are Brooks' kick-by-kick numbers with my comments. Underwhelming performance, all in all, though he did get better as the game wore on. 1st punt- from the WAS 22 34 yards - 4 yard return Poor - Immediate field position disadvantage. 2nd punt - from the WAS 41 27 yards - no return Poor- lost chance to pin the Giants back. 3rd punt - from the WAS 45 41 yards - no return (Inside the 20- 14 yard line) Nice job pinning them inside the 20 4th punt - from the WAS 42 33 yards - 3 yard return Poor - another lost opportunity to improve field position. 5th punt - from the WAS 46 34 yards - no return (downed at the 20 yard line) So so. An average kick here pins them further inside the 20. 6th punt - from the WAS 44 43 yards - no return (Inside 20 - 13 yard line) Excellent. 7th punt - from the WAS 26 53 yards - 14 yard return Excellent. Despite the distance, he didn't outkick the coverage. It was a good return by McQuarters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 brooks did get a nice 15 year penalty in his favor, took it like a man.speaking of, mr. penalty was our player of the game. Just what I was going to say,, and it was our 1st first down of the night. Took one for the team, he did. I didn't thin he had a horrible night. He's a rookie, they're the Giants, they roughed him up pretty good, and that stadium is notorious for weird winds on even calm days. He did alright. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCCOP Posted September 5, 2008 Share Posted September 5, 2008 I didn't think that he did to bad. His hang time was pretty good I thought. I really thing we need someone else to handle returns for us. I know that ( ARE ) was just trying to make something happen, but he was killing me. I just want to see one guy catch a punt a run straight up the field PLEASE... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.