BuryYourDuke Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 (2) Carlos Rogers is referred to in the 3rd person context by the "source." (3) Sean Taylor is referenced by the author in the 3rd person context. Fred Smoot used to refer to himself in the 3rd person all the time...I can see Carlos doing that maybe...just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twenty-eight Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Adam Archuleta Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da#1skinsfan Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Im thinking a backup LB... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grhqofb5 Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Fred Smoot used to refer to himself in the 3rd person all the time...I can see Carlos doing that maybe...just a thought. hmmm.... it's quite disturbing that we even have to consider that a player would actually refer to himself in the 3rd person. I believe the quote from the article was "carlos still heard about it in the meeting." Usually they don't refer to themselves in the 3rd when it's something negative, just like how they don't take their helmets off after a bad play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGSKINS Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Mark Brunell:silly: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NavyDave Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 If its factually and it seems that alot of it is then I'm not for attacking the messenger. Who doesnt think that williams isnt an arrogant bastige? The idea that he hired two ex bills to be a safeties coach and a corner backs coach and there is jealously between the two that had them having separate meetings between safeties and cornerbacks needed to be aired. There has always been suspicions about how the homegrown players becoming freeagents are treated and its even money that unless there is public pressure by 980 comcast to bash the front office to sign Cooley early that he is going to be let go for a Tony Gonzalez type. I'm thinking Springs cant be portis since alot of the stuff ison thedefensive side and you'd think those sides of the ball are separated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
georgiaredskin Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Is it possible to get a link to the whole article/transcript that's being quoted in pieces here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alaadin123 Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 I know they said it was a player but hell, it could be one of the 200 coaches we have that said it??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f_trizzy Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 It is obvious guys. When you hear "leader of the secondary" one name comes to mind... Vernon Fox. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyRules Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 We heard rumors after the game yesterday that it might be Marcus Washington. That would be hard to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyWilliamsFanClub Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Don't know if this has been posted yet or not, and Im too lazy to read. Shawn Springs, when asked about it, laughed heavily. Based on his response, I doubt it's him. And there's no way it was Sean Taylor. The article even said they take it easy on him, he wouldn't go out and say something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asnpcwiz Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 I don't know who it is, but my guess is they are talking about AA. He doesn't seem to even be playing from the same playbook . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BKSkinsFan Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 I hate to have to guess on which player this is. I do hope that this situation is addressed by Gibbs and taken care of. Whoever did say it needs to man up and confess he did it to the team, and this player should no longer be with us. I'm so sick of seeing negative things about our team, it's usually from former players who went on to sign elsewhere for more money, then trash the team that gave them the opportunity to sign that large contract. I can understand being frustrated, and even not liking the way things are done, but there is no excuse for calling out your coaches, and to hide your identity, is very cowardish. I don't care who it was, they need to go. If it was Taylor, CP, Arch, I don't care, if you have a problem with the coaches, tell the coaches, not a reporter, who you also tell not to reveal your name. Pack your sh*t up and get out of here, you're not a Redskin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Genghis Khan Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 My guess is maybe Lemar Marshall he got dogged really badly during that bucs games by the commentators and then the fans too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonArtest15 Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Forget about Sean Taylor...the kid hardly speaks to the media as it is....I HIGHLY doubt he would open up this can of worms to a journalist from ESPN....it has to be someone who is bitter.....my guesses are Rumph or Arch.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cosmopolitianbloodloss Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 I thought it was Springs at first, but after hearing him on Comcast yesterday, I don't anymore. Springs has a big mouth so I definitely think he would have just said it to the coaches. I'm leaning towards Archuleta because he has all this animosity with Gregg Williams because of getting benched. All of the stuff said in the article, like Springs said, is pretty common knowledge about the D last year and everyone knows we let some good guys go in past years. I wish they would just come out and say it though, this is such a distraction. I wonder if Gibbs & Co. knows yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrapeApe Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Arch makes perfect sense. He would be a likely candidate to be questioned by a reporter on his demotion. He can't be happy about the demotion. Taylor won't talk to the media at all. He doesn't trust them. I can't see it being him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skins4481 Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Whoever thinks it was Clinton Portis then you're an idiot. This guy is all about the team and he is not a coward. If he wanted to say something, he would come out and say it. Not to mention that he and Joe Gibbs are close so he would never do something like this to Gibbs. Man you guys turn on people fast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stricknn Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Whoever it is, they should get a thank you card from the organization. Something had to happen to spark this team and get them out of the hole they'd dug themselves into. The defense for the first time all year looked like it did the previous two seasons. The talk after the game was all about the article so there is no possible way people can pretend it didn't get the whole defenses attention. Gregg Williams, the defensive coaches, and all the players were called by that article and forced to respond. You hit the nail on the head. This article provided the spark that we needed! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurent Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 I honestly don't care. Judging by the reaction of the players the comments made by the unidentified source hit home. If that had any part in the team and coaches rallying around each other then it's served its purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bizkiteer Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Too much talk of the past few years, it can't be a new guy. Thus, AA wouldn't refer to how the past guys were treated and let go. Has to be a veteran that has been here for the last 2-3 yrs. Might not even be a starter... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meek Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 Might not even be a starter... You would think that it would have to be a starter since the guy is a leader of the secondary. This also somewhat rules out AA. I don't think anyone would consider Arch to be a leader of the secondary. It would be nice to believe Shawn, but thats where all the evidence points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CPortJGibbs89 Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 So did anyone hear what Czaban had to say regarding his theory on who it was. I figured someone would post this up????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
illone Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 It's Warrick Holdman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riggo#44 Posted November 27, 2006 Share Posted November 27, 2006 How come no one is looking at Rocky McIntosh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.