Bugs' Posted July 4, 2006 Share Posted July 4, 2006 We've become a paper tiger to the tin-hat dictators like this maniac in North Korea and the raghead in Iran. Easy kid! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugs' Posted July 4, 2006 Share Posted July 4, 2006 I'm sorry but the Useless Ninnies are not going to have the cahones to actually stand up to this little maniac and do anything substantive about him. IF anything useful is going to be done about this maniac it's going to have to be done by the United States and whatever other individual nations have the balls to actually DO something rather than slapping Kim Jong Il on the back of the hand and telling him to be a good boy AGAIN. The United States is all over the place.....policing issues in other countries and fighting the "war on terrorism". We are gone to spread ourselves to thin one of these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mass_SkinsFan Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Easy kid! Sorry' date=' but you're never going to convince me that these worthless sacks of garbage and those who have kept them in power deserve anything more than a 7.62mm NATO to the back of the head. They and their entire regimes should be bombed back into pre-history and left in their own smoking ruins. The United States is all over the place.....policing issues in other countries and fighting the "war on terrorism". We are gone to spread ourselves to thin one of these days. I agree we're spread too thin. There's no reason for us to be in places like Europe and many of the other areas where we have forces stationed. We should not be an international police force. We should be the swift, decisive and deadly "hand of fate" if you will. The force that just wipes an offender off the map entirely. A cosmic "reset" button, if you will. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugs' Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Sorry, but you're never going to convince me that these worthless sacks of garbage and those who have kept them in power deserve anything more than a 7.62mm NATO to the back of the head. They and their entire regimes should be bombed back into pre-history and left in their own smoking ruins.I agree we're spread too thin. There's no reason for us to be in places like Europe and many of the other areas where we have forces stationed. We should not be an international police force. We should be the swift, decisive and deadly "hand of fate" if you will. The force that just wipes an offender off the map entirely. A cosmic "reset" button, if you will. Your starting to scare me a bit MSF, sort of sounds like you support Genocide... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mass_SkinsFan Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Your starting to scare me a bit MSF' date=' sort of sounds like you support Genocide... [/quote']If I'm just STARTING to scare you Bugs', then you haven't read too many of my posts over time. So far as I am concerned the population in these countries is as at fault as their government. So far as I am concerned, when you attack a country you attack every person there. It's an Us vs. Them mentality. Everyone who isn't on Our side is on Their side. I place the safety and security of 1 American soldier above the lives of every "civilian" in an enemy country. It's that's simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LD0506 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Your starting to scare me a bit MSF' date=' sort of sounds like you support Genocide... [/quote']but you say that like it's a bad thing......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rincewind Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 If I'm just STARTING to scare you Bugs', then you haven't read too many of my posts over time. So far as I am concerned the population in these countries is as at fault as their government. So far as I am concerned, when you attack a country you attack every person there. It's an Us vs. Them mentality. Everyone who isn't on Our side is on Their side. I place the safety and security of 1 American soldier above the lives of every "civilian" in an enemy country. It's that's simple. Yeah Bugs - if you didn't know over-the-top, kill everyone posts were how MSF got attention by now, you need to read more. So... basically MSF wants America to wipe an entire country off the map for firing missiles into another country's water - NONE of which involved any of America's land, air, or sea. Yeah, makes sense. I'm not saying that something doesn't need to be done about Kim's crazy-ass - i'm just saying that genocide IS NOT the thing that needs to be done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallen5862 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 The News said that North Korea started launching the Six missles at same time as Space shuttle was launched. The Big rocket booster landed in Indian ocean. I wonder if they were trying to shoot at the Shuttle. The News said the Defense shield was up and in process of getting shoot down orders when the long range missle crashed just 42 seconds into flight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bugs' Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 If I'm just STARTING to scare you Bugs', then you haven't read too many of my posts over time. So far as I am concerned the population in these countries is as at fault as their government. So far as I am concerned, when you attack a country you attack every person there. It's an Us vs. Them mentality. Everyone who isn't on Our side is on Their side. I place the safety and security of 1 American soldier above the lives of every "civilian" in an enemy country. It's that's simple. Your entitled to your opinion. I just don't share it to the extreme that you do. but you say that like it's a bad thing......... I hope your joking.....if not, I feel sorry for you. Yeah Bugs - if you didn't know over-the-top, kill everyone posts were how MSF got attention by now, you need to read more. So... basically MSF wants America to wipe an entire country off the map for firing missiles into another country's water - NONE of which involved any of America's land, air, or sea. Yeah, makes sense. I'm not saying that something doesn't need to be done about Kim's crazy-ass - i'm just saying that genocide IS NOT the thing that needs to be done. I agree that Genocide is not the answer. Send some experts in to take Kim's ass out. I couldn't imagine being in favor of killing an entire race or culture for any reason whatsoever. It's scary to me that some people think this way because that means that just as many people in other countries think the same way about us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 We should "test" some of our own long-range missiles right to N Korea, just to help em out and show em how its done.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickalino Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Relax, guys. There's a shortage of dog meat in Korea now, so they're haivng to hunt down dogs outside their borders, in order to sufficiently feed their people. These missiles are nothing more than an attempt to kill a few German Shephards in Japan, for the NK leader's upcoming banquet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Harris Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Relax, guys.There's a shortage of dog meat in Korea now, so they're haivng to hunt down dogs outside their borders, in order to sufficiently feed their people. These missiles are nothing more than an attempt to kill a few German Shephards in Japan, for the NK leader's upcoming banquet german shepherds? probably akita's, dude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChocolateCitySkin Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Who cares? Their country sucks. Il Dong just likes to make noise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seabee1973 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 I agree we're spread too thin. There's no reason for us to be in places like Europe and many of the other areas where we have forces stationed. We should not be an international police force. We should be the swift, decisive and deadly "hand of fate" if you will. The force that just wipes an offender off the map entirely. A cosmic "reset" button, if you will. If the Un would do its job we would not have to be world police Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ax Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 If the Un would do its job we would not have to be world police Bingo! Unfortunately, they won't. Hell, the FRENCH have more balls than this useless organization. Which means they have none at all. Kim needs to go NOW. By whatever means necessary. Including nukes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thelarkascend1ng Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 unlike most textbook-worthy events in the past 5 years or so, there really isn't any historical context in which Kim Jong can exist other than the "absolutely uncontroversial *******s" column........ in the appendix, of course. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiebear Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Bingo!Unfortunately, they won't. Hell, the FRENCH have more balls than this useless organization. Which means they have none at all. Kim needs to go NOW. By whatever means necessary. Including nukes. The French are in charge of the Sudan..... nuff said there. So the U.N. got together AND? 7 missiles in less than a day.. the 3rd being 6000 miles range breaking up in flight.. While making threats? Do words w/actions have no meaning anymore? We should draft up a seriously harsh memo with letterhead.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 I can see the press release from Pyongyang now....Claiming that the US and western forces either sabotaged the missile or shot it down. Hey, if they want to claim that we now posess a tested, working missile defense system, then my response would be a big "no comment". And a Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 If I'm just STARTING to scare you Bugs', then you haven't read too many of my posts over time. So far as I am concerned the population in these countries is as at fault as their government. So far as I am concerned, when you attack a country you attack every person there. It's an Us vs. Them mentality. Everyone who isn't on Our side is on Their side. I place the safety and security of 1 American soldier above the lives of every "civilian" in an enemy country. It's that's simple. Darned right. It's the population's fault that they're not starving to death fast enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mass_SkinsFan Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Darned right. It's the population's fault that they're not starving to death fast enough. No. It's the population's fault for not openly revolting against a government whose policies are forcing them to starve to death. Now before somebody wants to tell me how everyond in North Korea thinks they live in Utopia.... If the population is that stupid, they get what they deserve. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zguy28 Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Does anyone remember history? Doesn't this remind anyone of Hitler rearming the Rhineland and then the League of Nations and United States did nothing about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pez Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Nukes are not a viable option... The fallout from a nuke would cause fallout affecting other countries in the area as well. I do not blame the people of NK, as they are a simple people. Somone just needs to send a sniper in to take take care of that ronry man. BTW, if as some of you people say we just start blowing people off the map, that would cause worldwide aggression against the US. We have to play nice with the entire planet's community. It's one thing to go to war with one or 2 countries, but we cannot end up with a U.S. against the world scenario. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mass_SkinsFan Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 BTW, if as some of you people say we just start blowing people off the map, that would cause worldwide aggression against the US. We have to play nice with the entire planet's community. It's one thing to go to war with one or 2 countries, but we cannot end up with a U.S. against the world scenario. I'm not talking about taking on the ENTIRE WORLD. Just those parts of it that seem incapable of following resonable demands from the United States. You know things like... "Don't test fire that missile." or "Shut down your nuclear program." Of course the fact that I see everything as the U.S. versus the entire world probably doesn't help my viewpoint any. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 Of course the fact that I see everything as the U.S. versus the entire world probably doesn't help my viewpoint any. No, you don't. You see everything as you against the entire world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Air Force Cane Posted July 5, 2006 Share Posted July 5, 2006 good point Zguy- but you are mixing analogies Hitler began rearmament in 1935 which was forbidden by the Versailles treaty. He marched in and annexed the Rhineland in 1936. Libs have no clue about historical trends, strategic policy or military tactics. Thanks Maddy Albright!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.