Agreed. When those rules were put in place, the $1.1 billion borrowing limit was half or more of the sales price. Really odd to me that they put a dollar limit on borrowing, rather than a percentage of sales price limit. And they have a percentage of sales price limit on the lead investor's equity stake, which also seems odd, rather than a dollar limit. They seem to have reversed the two methods of arriving at the limit figures from what would make the most sense, as team values increase. It is counter-intuitive, and goes against the owners' own interests, IMO.