Number 44

Not seein' it. Has nothing to do with competition, and the accused parties are already no longer with the team. Draft picks won't be involved. Will there likely be a fine? Sure.

I don't see why any draft picks would be forfeited.

Perhaps I'm a bit old-fashioned and prudish, but it seems to me that, in fact, it was she that didn't hear Beathard, not the other way around. I get the argument that women reporters make about it being a competitive disadvantage for them to not be able to get quotes from players in the locker room, but I agree with Beathard that it is simply inappropriate to allow members of the opposite sex to enter a sex-specific locker room. People will be in various stages of undress in a locker room. Reporters of the opposite sex of an athlete should just accept what is appropriate and get their interviews somewhere other than in the locker room, IMO. For her to say it was OK with her is, IMO, totally beside the point. It isn't her decision to decide that it is OK. What if some of the players would prefer privacy or feel somewhat uncomfortable being naked in front of a woman asking them questions? What about the players' wives and families preferring that women not be in their husband's/son's/father's presence when they were naked? I've never really understood that; and for players to, in turn, be held accountable for anything they may say in the locker room that might offend a woman reporter seems unfair to me. For a woman to claim to be offended that a player said something sexually suggestive or the like while she was staring at his naked body just seems bizarre, on its face. As I said, maybe I'm just old fashioned. I also didn't understand her story about the player that told his wife that he was out on an interview with her as a cover for his adultery, asking her to confirm that, should his wife ask. How is that sexual harassment? Slimy and in poor taste? Of course. Inappropriate? Sure. I would guess that, more often than not, guys committing adultery use their male friends as their cover story, rather than a female acquaintance. That is equally slimy and inappropriate. The reporter being a woman doesn't matter in this instance, does it? Seems to me she should just have said, "Don't involve me in your family matters. I'm not going to lie to your wife." It is certainly wrong to ask such a thing of anyone of either sex, but in any case, I don't see that as being sexual harassment of the reporter.

Impossible.

Special teams?

Hey, I didn't bring the subject up, it was someone else's "random thot." I'm on no soapbox here.

Interestingly, I have never in my life heard anyone use the term "redskin" in a disparaging way. I have, however, witnessed some idiots disparagingly call a native American "chief." Yet, to my knowledge, the Kansas City team receives no protests.

I think source 1 had a few too many of those beers he likes before he wrote this take.

Yes, I believe that was increased by 2, as well. Now 48.

Few players end up being stud LTs, even 1st round picks. Charles was taken with the second pick of the 4th round, BTW.

Didn't the new CBA increase the roster to 55?

You forgot 8-tracks. 😀

Hard to argue with 1 sack and zero penalties in over 500 snaps.

Interesting. We disagree on that, as I would think that the majority of double teams vs. DT would be in pass blocking.

Do you think it would be fair to say that he played on more passing downs than Allen and Payne? Seems to me that would be a factor in your chart. Hey, I like having the 3 of them. I think it provides a really strong rotation at DT.

Don't touch my stuff.

Trautman in round 6? I think the programming on this simulator needs some tweaking.

Gotcha, thanks.

I'm sorry, I believe I misread the post. It looked to me like you had added a 1st round pick in both 2021 and 2022. Now I'm assuming that they are just showing that the Redskins have a first round pick in each of those years (which seems strange to me). You'd think that they would only note any changes to the norm as far as future years' picks are concerned. Or am I still reading it wrong?

How did you get all these extra picks and keep pick #2?