• Blog Entries

    • By Destino in ES Coverage
         1
      We’re still doing this?  Absolutely!  Despite all the compelling reasons to just let everyone go home and enjoy and extended offseason, this is not an option.  The games must be played, and therefore we the long-suffering fans will feel compelled to watch.  Even games no reasonable football fan would choose to watch like, for example, today’s Redskins Jets game.   

      Today’s convergence of sadness features the 30th ranked scoring offense (Jets 14.4 ppg) versus the 32nd (Redskins 12.0 ppg).  The first team to 15 wins!  With no playoff aspirations the compelling story lines for this game are largely limited to watching young players (hopefully) develop.  Dwayne Haskins gets his first home start and Derrius Guice is back from injury.   
       
      My, reasonable, goals for today’s game:  
      1- Score a touchdown 
      2- Score more than 17 points.   
      3- Haskins throws for 200 yards or more with no interceptions  
      4- Guice runs the ball at least 10 times and finishes at 3.5 yards per carry and healthy.  
       
      Hoping for a win at this point feels like setting myself up for disappointment, so I’m happy to settle for an entertaining loss.  
       
      Special thanks to @pez for some excellent Guinness beef stew.  If you absolutely have to stand in a frozen parking lot at 9am, the best place to do it is at the Extremeskins Tailgate with Pez and @Huly.  Great fans, great people. 
       
      The Redskins have declared for the following players as inactive: 
      Paul Richardson  
      Colt McCoy 
      Deshazor Everett 
      Chris Thompson  
      Ross Pierschbacher 
      Vernon Davis  
      Tim Settle  
       
      The Jets declared the following players as inactive  
      Nate Hairston  
      Darryl Roberts  
      Paul Worrilow 
      Matthias Farley  
      CJ Mosley  
      Jordan Willis  
      Leo Koloamatangi 
       
      1st Quarter - Redskins 0 - 6 Jets
      If you wanted to sit in the cold and watch a football game with some Jets fans at FedEx, but were worried that there were not enough seats available, I have good news.  There’s plenty of space available, so come on down and prove you’re a real fan by sitting though this in person.
       
      Jets dominated the 1st quarter even though they only scored 6 points.  The reason being that Washington managed only 13 yards of offense and a single first down.  
       
      Question: Is it still a check down pass if the QB never looks at anyone else?
       
      2nd Quarter - Redskins 3 - 20 Jets
      The Jets have achieved an insurmountable 13 point lead early in the 2nd quarter.  All hope is lost.

      Is there a more perfect example of the Redskins offense than their first scoring drive in the 2nd quarter?  Interception gives the Redskins the ball on the Jets 16 yard line.  They proceed to march 10 yards backwards before kicking a field goal from the Jets 26.  It's perfect.  Two or three more field goals we can call it a day. 

      The Jets score again and if feels like they are are just piling on at this point.  Three touchdowns in the first half for them, just three points for the redskins.  Our streak of no touchdowns has now extended to 15 quarters. 
       
      3rd Quarter - Redskins 3 - 20 Jets
      There is a spider slowly descending from the ceiling in the press box and it's the most interesting thing that's happened during the third quarter of this game. 
       
      I have decided to allow the spider to live, provided it does not touch me.  I'm off to get some more caffeine. 

      4th Quarter - Redskins 17 - 34 Jets
      The first wave of Redskins fans, the few that are here, started streaming towards the exits after that 4th Jets touchdown.  As if the Jets didn't have this game wrapped up in the 2nd quarter. 
       
      Jet have now more than doubled their average points per game and have matched their season high of 34 points (and they missed two field goals in this game). 
       
      TOUCHDOWN REDSKINS!  THE DROUGHT IT OVER!  Guice took a short pass from Haskins  all the way to the house.  2 point conversion is successful on a pass from Haskins to Quinn. 
       
      The Redskins score another touchdown!  This feels like an embarrassment of riches, even if we are still certain to lose this game. 
       
      End of Game.
       
      Let's review those reasonable goals I mentioned earlier:
       
      1- Success.
      2- Close enough, I'm counting it
      3- Haskins did throw for over 200, but unfortunately did have an interception. 
      4- Guice was not given the opportunity to run the ball ten times today.  He did however score on a 45 yard TD pass and finish the game healthy.  I'll take it.
       
      Even though the Redskins lost, it was good to see the offense show some faint signs of life and end the streak of games without a TD.  The team looked competitive for much of the second half, and perhaps they could have made this a fun game if they carried that same energy throughout.  It was good to see Guice and Mclaurin show out today.  I think both of them have a future with this team that I look forward to seeing. 

       
       

       
       
       
       
       
BRAVEONAWARPATH

The Official "Marvel" Thread (Movies,Comics etc)

Recommended Posts

I would rather see a movie adaptation of DD (with the cast from Netflix) before either of those.

 

Still a shame what happened. You can't just up and ****can talent/production like that

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
On 3/11/2019 at 9:13 PM, BRAVEONAWARPATH said:

I'm probably the only person who wants to see a Hawkeye solo film.

 

You're not the only one.  I love him.  I've been thinking about what a Hawkeye solo film could be like, and I do think that Iron Man and Captain America movies tread a little bit on the natural ground for a Hawkeye story, so I would mix it up and do something very different.  Go back to his roots in the circus maybe and tell a very old origin story.  I would like a kind of Robin Hood style story about seeking justice in a corrupt system.  Maybe the Swordsman as the mentor/villain.  Or if that's too similar to what Captain Marvel and Winter Soldier and Ant-Man did, then the mystery format could work too.

 

Robin Hood movies have been so poorly done outside of the 1938 Errol Flynn classic, it would be fun if Marvel did a good one via the Hawkeye character.

Edited by stevemcqueen1
1938
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/10/2019 at 11:20 PM, BRAVEONAWARPATH said:

I thought Brie's portrayal of Carol Danvers was spot on.

 

I've been thinking about this too, and I agree with you.  I'm pretty sure she based her portrayal off of DeConnick's version of the character, and she nailed it.  She had Carol's very appealing mixture of toughness and intelligence and tenderness and breezy cool.  I thought she nailed her sense of humor too.  The dry, laid back cheek.  Carol is playful and doesn't have an ego, and she is never angsty or at war with her power like many male superheroes.  Being comfortable in her own skin despite the fact that she goes through so many changes and is constantly having her memories and personality reset is a big part of the best version of the Carol Danvers character, and Brie captured that.

5 minutes ago, Momma There Goes That Man said:

how dare you

 

I have a hard time distinguishing his performance from Roger Rees's in Men In Tights.

 

That was an abortion of a movie but I've still seen it several times, and recently too.  It's still good for campy laughs, and I have always liked Kevin Costner in spite of some of the dogs he's made.  He is an excellent actor and he came surprisingly close to making that role work even though he was utterly unsuited for the part.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think Costner is a wooden plank that has been blessed with good scripts and great co-stars. Robin Hood is a great example of the latter. It would have been a disaster but with Freeman and Rickman, it somehow kinda worked. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wanted to give my thoughts on Captain Marvel too now that I've seen it:

 

1 - I thought it was well photographed, and that there was a mixing of two distinct styles that was very clever.  First is the beautiful and heavily saturated and dystopic visual style of a Blade Runner type Sci-Fi when she is on Hala and Torfa.  Then you get the late 80's and early 90's big budget action movie style starting with the Blockbuster scene with big crane shots and panoramas and a grittier and more earth toned/monochromatic Southern California landscape.  The mimicry of this visual style is a big part of why people got such a strong sense of happy 90's nostalgia from watching the film.  It is strongly reminiscent of Terminator 2, Top Gun, and Lethal Weapon.

 

2 - I felt that the film was surprisingly faithful to the comics and was mostly based off the DeConnick runs.  There were key visual moments in the film that were nearly quotations of frames from her comic, like when she flew up and stared down the Kree warship.  I felt that reading the comics made the film a lot more enjoyable, perhaps even more so than with the other Marvel Studios works.  The writers and directors had good source material to work with and they knew it.  They also dropped a ton of easter eggs and moments of fan service for the comic readers.

 

3 - That said, there were some big/meaningful changes.  First off, it seems like MCU combines the Kree with the Spartax, and that the Kree have a much more villainous role in the MCU than they do in the comics as a result.  They set this up in GotG 2 by going with Ego as Starlord's father instead of J'Son.  Captain Marvel just kind of rolled with this direction and, rather than setting up the whole Spartax civilization/setting/characters/backstory, they used what was already there in the Kree, who worked well enough for the story.

 

4 - But they did drastically alter the role of the Skrull in the process.  They turned the Kree/Skrull war into a blend of the Spartax vs the Torfa refugees plot line from the amazing Higher Faster Further run (they referenced this phrase directly in the film) with elements of the Annihilation storyline from 2007.  In doing this, they turned the Skrull--some of the biggest and best villains in Marvel--into sympathetic characters and good guys.  I don't know how I feel about this.  On the one hand, the film robbed any potential Fantastic Four films from doing good Skrull story lines, which is kind of a bummer.  On the other hand, I don't really want a Secret Invasion story from the MCU.  I didn't really like several of the Brian Michael Bendis storylines from the aughts, and Secret Invasion was one of them.  And Marvel has recklessly used the Skrulls for retconning, and I would be glad if the films avoided doing the same.

 

5 - I liked the nod the movie gave to Kevin Smith with Stan Lee's cameo.  If you missed it, he's reading a Mallrats script and practicing his part in that film.

 

6 - I did think that there were some story telling issues with the movie that reminded me of some of the problems I had with Dr Strange.  The movie was fairly short and rapidly paced and they didn't spend a lot of time developing character.  I recognize that this is particularly challenging to do with Carol Danvers because she has no family and almost no memory of her past to emotionally ground her.  Thus the character of Marie Rambeau became extremely important.  But I still didn't really feel like it was enough.  I needed to feel like leading the Skrulls off to find a new world was a bigger sacrifice for Carol.

 

7 - Speaking of the Rambeaus, I thought using the opportunity of setting the film in the early 90's to blend Monica Rambeau with Kit Renner (Lieutenant Trouble) was very clever.  That's one of the sweetest and most grounding character dynamics for comic book version of Carol, it was a good way to work it into the film version.  They've sewn the ground for Monica's character very well, and I really look forward to her being a part of sequels.

 

8 - Casting Annette Benning as Mar Vell was another pretty huge change, but it made sense for the film.  It helped establish the powerful feminist theme of female mentorship the film was seeking.  Something that I felt Wonder Woman actually subverted...

 

9 - Lastly, about the feminism of the film: Inclusion is powerful, and it makes this film important.  It is unabashedly feminist and puts Brie Larson front and center as a leader for the cultural direction of Marvel moving forward.  I feel that this is in accord with the spirit of Marvel, which has always been at the vanguard of racial, religious, and gender inclusion.  There was a lot of that movie that passed me by but spoke directly to the female audience.  I was surprised by how moved my wife was after it was over.  She's never really been a big feminist and she tends to roll her eyes or even recoil from how shrill feminism can be.  But it really resonated with her to see Carol kick ass and defeat all of the people putting her down and trying to control her.  As a straight white male, it can be easy to take for granted how stirring and satisfying it is to see portrayals of people like you being powerful heroes.  It's cool that Marvel has started making films for other kinds of people too.

  • Like 7

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

Dont disagree with any of that except for the comic specific stuff because I have no idea one way or the other.

 

I will say, you have 20+ years for the Skrull to develop from the time we last see them in the movie. Their leadership could change or a terrorist group splinters off etc. They could still have future Skrull villain stories if they wanted. 

 

Topically speaking, it would actually work pretty well if Carol was criticized for choosing to help them and having the message be that a small group of terrorists doesn't represent an entire race of good peaceful people. 

Edited by Momma There Goes That Man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Momma There Goes That Man said:

Dont disagree with any of that except for the comic specific stuff because I have no idea one way or the other.

 

I will say, you have 20+ years for the Skrull to develop from the time we last see them in the movie. Their leadership could change or a terrorist group splinters off etc. They could still have future Skrull villain stories if they wanted.  

  

Topically speaking, it would actually work pretty well if Carol was criticized for choosing to help them and having the message be that a small group of terrorists doesn't represent an entire race of good peaceful people.  

 

Well, even that would be pretty different from the classic portrayals of the Skrull.  They were pretty much an enemy empire bent on conquest and territorial expansion from the get go.

 

The good thing about the FF is that they have a ton of good villains to work with, so they don't necessarily need Super Skrull.  You've got to do Doom anyway.  Galactus if you can.  Annihilus and Namor.  Plus a lot of really fun second tier ones like Mole Man, Molecule Man, Puppet Master, and the Frightful Four.  Puppet Master could actually make for a really great movie.  There are enough to do like 10 movies without ever using Super Skrull.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Also wanted to ask if anyone knows why they changed Chewie's name to Goose for the movie?  I liked the Top Gun reference, but are they not allowed to mention Star Wars in the MCU?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, stevemcqueen1 said:

Also wanted to ask if anyone knows why they changed Chewie's name to Goose for the movie?  I liked the Top Gun reference, but are they not allowed to mention Star Wars in the MCU?

good question

 

wasn't even aware its original name was Chewie

 

c5b5cb9df978ac45542cb6b12fc09e10.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, stevemcqueen1 said:

Also wanted to ask if anyone knows why they changed Chewie's name to Goose for the movie?  I liked the Top Gun reference, but are they not allowed to mention Star Wars in the MCU?

I was wondering about the change too. I think it was to add more Top Gun. As for Star Wars, I'm pretty sure Spider-Man referenced Empire Strikes Back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah aren't they now owned by the same company  (Disney) ? Seems like it could be a preference thing and not fear of violating trademark laws

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

BTW, about that CM soundtrack, how dope was using Celebrity Skin for the end credits?  I also loved the moment they chose to use the No Doubt song.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
14 minutes ago, stevemcqueen1 said:

BTW, about that CM soundtrack, how dope was using Celebrity Skin for the end credits?  I also loved the moment they chose to use the No Doubt song.

 

Loved the soundtrack and how carefully chosen it was. I’m Just a Girl during the key fight and Come As You Are as Carol just starts realizing the potential of her unleashed powers and how handcuffed she’s been were the two best moments for me. 

Edited by Momma There Goes That Man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21 hours ago, The Evil Genius said:

I'm guessing Rambeau's daughter can be used as a version of Captain Marvel or Photon if the sequel is set in modern day?

 

If you noticed, Rambeau's call sign on her jet was Photon, so it would make sense for her daughter to adopt this.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/14/2019 at 9:52 AM, Momma There Goes That Man said:

I think Costner is a wooden plank that has been blessed with good scripts and great co-stars. Robin Hood is a great example of the latter. It would have been a disaster but with Freeman and Rickman, it somehow kinda worked. 

 

Um, No Way Out? Bull Durham? Waterworld? He was terrific in those. 

 

And yeah, Rickman totally saves Robin Hood. You watch it basically for him. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Mournblade said:

 

Um, No Way Out? Bull Durham? Waterworld? He was terrific in those. 

 

And yeah, Rickman totally saves Robin Hood. You watch it basically for him. 

 

He's a wooden board in pretty much everything. He reminds of Tugg Speedman trying to cry in Tropic Thunder. He just can't get there. That's Costner for me. He's a handsome stand-in, an empty vessel that is there so good scripts and good cast members can work off him. 

Edited by Momma There Goes That Man

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn’t think Captain Marvel was all that good, they coulda kept the entire Cap Marvel stuff out of the Avengers IMO. I want to see the Day 1s kill Thanos. Just my opinion. It would be lame if she’s the one who takes him down. 

  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see why would they keep her out especially if she is setting up to be the vanguard of the next Avengers era with Blank Panther and I assume Spider-Man. 

 

I doubt she will come in and just wipe out Thanos but in Infinity War, Strange, Quill and Spider-Man had him dead to rights and nobody there was a day 1 guy except Iron Man. I wouldn't care if she did kill him but I'm sure it will be something like IW. Everybody banding together with a couple making a sacrifice somehow. 

 

Captain Marvel's value will come in her potential for time dilation or some possibility she learned about in her 20 years in the cosmos that will give them a path forward to returning all of those snapped. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Momma There Goes That Man said:

 

He's a wooden board in pretty much everything. He reminds of Tugg Speedman trying to cry in Tropic Thunder. He just can't get there. That's Costner for me. He's a handsome stand-in, an empty vessel that is there so good scripts and good cast members can work off him.  

 

This is calumny.  To add to Mournblade's list: Dances With Wolves, Tin Cup, The Untouchables, JFK & Thirteen Days, Field of Dreams, Wyatt Earp, Open Range.  All excellent work.  He's aged well too, one of his best performances was in the fairly recent Hatfields & McCoys miniseries.

1 minute ago, Momma There Goes That Man said:

Captain Marvel's value will come in her potential for time dilation or some possibility she learned about in her 20 years in the cosmos that will give them a path forward to returning all of those snapped.  

 

This is the real challenge of the movie, not killing Thanos.  They have to figure out a way to free everyone who got trapped in the soul stone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.