oscarsandman Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 This is nothing new but I just heard that Mike Shanahan said on pro football talk live that the league spoke to people in the Redskins organization about the time when Gregg Williams was here but that he doesn't know if anything came of it. He also referenced PD and implied that he believed him when he said there wasn't a bounty system here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.T.real,lights,out Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 ^^ I will take PD's word over Los any day of the week Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss_Hogg Posted May 17, 2012 Share Posted May 17, 2012 Los has an axe to grind, so take his testimony with a grain of salt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted June 27, 2012 Share Posted June 27, 2012 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/06/27/carlos-rogers-thinks-the-way-goodell-handles-things-is-kind-of-crazy/ An update since some posters were so upset with Rogers' remarks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted June 27, 2012 Share Posted June 27, 2012 It doesn't "add out" to me either Carlos. (Man he needs some English lessons) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rk3025 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 What I read was that Greg was a great coach and spiff money in meetings were players emotions and Goodell never played pro ball to understand the trash talk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 I'm glad that clown is gone and I was a big defender of his. Wilson I like so much better. He makes one good point, Goodell sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 What I read was that Greg was a great coach and spiff money in meetings were players emotions and Goodell never played pro ball to understand the trash talk. See, i can agree with a lot, but the 'great coach' part does not stand up to any sort of reality. Interesting how rogers' comments now directly oppose what he said a few months ago. In the OP, Carlos goes on about how there WAS money offered for knocking a player out, and now he somehow just can't fathom other players hurting people on purpose for money. Here's a tip, Carlos. Shut up. You're contradicting yourself, and making yourself look pretty stupid. ~Bang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 See, i can agree with a lot, but the 'great coach' part does not stand up to any sort of reality.Interesting how rogers' comments now directly oppose what he said a few months ago. In the OP, Carlos goes on about how there WAS money offered for knocking a player out, and now he somehow just can't fathom other players hurting people on purpose for money. Here's a tip, Carlos. Shut up. You're contradicting yourself, and making yourself look pretty stupid. ~Bang He's admitting that there were bonuses for legally hitting a player so hard he leaves the game. That's a far cry from payments for intentionally injuring an opponent. It's fairly obvious that he's saying they tried to "hurt" other players to get them out of the game but they didn't try to "injure" them. We all know the difference so its not much of a contradiction. If anything it just shows how the media can present the same quotes for whatever agenda they have at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rk3025 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Carlos could get investagated himself and have a meeting with Goodell to get suspended as he is now mad at the Redskins. Changed story or taken out of text. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DButz65 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Carlos Rogers confirms that Gregg Williams used bounties in D.C I have not read the entire thread, don't really care to, but when I saw the thread title I thought to myself.. did he say he caught interceptions too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 It doesn't "add out" to me either Carlos.(Man he needs some English lessons) Auburn must be so proud...another fine example of that SEC education... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyandSam Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 He's admitting that there were bonuses for legally hitting a player so hard he leaves the game. That's a far cry from payments for intentionally injuring an opponent. It's fairly obvious that he's saying they tried to "hurt" other players to get them out of the game but they didn't try to "injure" them. We all know the difference so its not much of a contradiction. If anything it just shows how the media can present the same quotes for whatever agenda they have at the time. :bsflag: What planet are you from? "Hurt" and "injure" mean the same damn thing to all of us. From Dictionary.Com: hurt [hurt] verb, hurt, hurt·ing, noun, adjectiveverb (used with object) 1.to cause bodily injury to; injure: He was badly hurt in the accident. 2.to cause bodily pain to or in: The wound still hurts him. 3.to damage or decrease the efficiency of (a material object) by striking, rough use, improper care, etc.: Moths can't hurt this suit because it's mothproof. Dirty oil can hurt a car's engine. 4.to affect adversely; harm: to hurt one's reputation; It wouldn't hurt the lawn if you watered it more often. 5.to cause mental pain to; offend or grieve: She hurt his feelings by not asking him to the party. in·jure [in-jer] verb (used with object), in·jured, in·jur·ing.1.to do or cause harm of any kind to; damage; hurt; impair: to injure one's hand. 2.to do wrong or injustice to. 3.to wound or offend: to injure a friend's feelings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 I think Carlos should be check regularly for concussions, because he certainly seems to be getting dumber. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Laxpunk2006 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 :bsflag:What planet are you from? "Hurt" and "injure" mean the same damn thing to all of us. From Dictionary.Com: Thank you Mr. Webster for that education I am clearly lacking. Just as your examples shows, words have multiple meanings. When I played lacrosse every time I hit someone I wanted to "hurt" them, as in inflict pain. I wanted it to hurt so bad that the next time there was a ground ball they didn't hustle to it quite as fast because they knew what was coming. I never wanted to injure the opponent. Through the use of context and common sense it can be deduced that many athletes want to cause physical pain or "hurt" their opponents to distract or demotivate them. That is not that same as attempting to cause an actual injury. It doesn't take a dictionary to see the difference in the way two similar words are used. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colesfan05 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 :bsflag:What planet are you from? "Hurt" and "injure" mean the same damn thing to all of us. From Dictionary.Com: I'm not so sure about that. If you're getting a shot and the doctor says, "this is going to hurt," that's cool. But if the doctor says "this is going to injure you," it seems a lot different. While the definition may technically be the same, I believe most people associate hurt with a temporary feeling of pain and injury with a long term impact to someone's health. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldskoolskins Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 :bsflag:What planet are you from? "Hurt" and "injure" mean the same damn thing to all of us. From Dictionary.Com: I disagree, hurt and injure are different. If I punch someone in the face it's gonna hurt, if I break their jaw now they're injured and hurting.. Only the English language would have words that mean the same but are different at the same time.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 ::What planet are you from? "Hurt" and "injure" mean the same damn thing to all of us. From Dictionary.Com: With respect to sports... and thanks to the movie "The Program"... if you are "hurt" you can still play... if you are "injured" you cannot... If I get a message, will it hurt at times? Yes. Will it injure me? No. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyandSam Posted June 28, 2012 Share Posted June 28, 2012 Thank you Mr. Webster for that education I am clearly lacking. Just as your examples shows, words have multiple meanings. When I played lacrosse every time I hit someone I wanted to "hurt" them, as in inflict pain. I wanted it to hurt so bad that the next time there was a ground ball they didn't hustle to it quite as fast because they knew what was coming. I never wanted to injure the opponent. Through the use of context and common sense it can be deduced that many athletes want to cause physical pain or "hurt" their opponents to distract or demotivate them. That is not that same as attempting to cause an actual injury. It doesn't take a dictionary to see the difference in the way two similar words are used. The INTENT was to knock players out of the game so they could not compete. For a professional football player, that means you have to hurt/injure the player pretty severely to make that happen. YOU are playing word games. Let me also add, that to force a player out of a game to gain a competitive advantage is just plain chicken****. If you are going to beat the other team, you want to go with your best against their best. Injuries happen in sports. But to purposely injure/hurt another player is cheating and just wrong. Period. Hitting your opponent hard is not the same as trying to knock them out of the game. THAT was the purpose of the bounties. ---------- Post added June-28th-2012 at 12:21 PM ---------- With respect to sports... and thanks to the movie "The Program"... if you are "hurt" you can still play... if you are "injured" you cannot...If I get a message, will it hurt at times? Yes. Will it injure me? No. BS...players play with "injuries" all the time. The NFL and every other sport calls them "injuries," not "hurts" or "ouchies". ---------- Post added June-28th-2012 at 12:26 PM ---------- I disagree, hurt and injure are different. If I punch someone in the face it's gonna hurt, if I break their jaw now they're injured and hurting..Only the English language would have words that mean the same but are different at the same time.. When YOU are recognized as the authority on the English language, then you can write your own dictionary. Until then, Mr Webster and other linguistic experts will be my source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pray4surf Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 A more appropriate thread title would be; PFT.COM Carlos Rogers confirms that he has 2 brain cells and they're fighting. Dude just needs to STFU! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaddogCT Posted June 29, 2012 Share Posted June 29, 2012 An interesting perspective from last year and decades past. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/dc-sports-bog/post/drew-pearson-compares-deangelo-hall-to-diron-talbert/2011/09/26/gIQAhd8RzK_blog.html Drew Pearson compares DeAngelo Hall to Diron Talbert ...If you’re going to try to purposely go after an area of somebody’s body, knowing that area’s injured, you’re probably gonna wind up missing the tackle or not making the play....I don’t think anybody can say ‘Hey, I need to make this tackle, but I need to hit him in the ribs to do it.’ They just want to make the play, and then the extracurricular stuff comes in after that.” follow link for the whole story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punch it in Posted June 30, 2012 Share Posted June 30, 2012 stone hands strikes again - Demarcus Ware, Aaron Rodgers - just a couple of people we passed on to draft him and his dumb mustache. :mad: ---------- Post added June-30th-2012 at 12:51 AM ---------- actually I didnt like JC's mustache either - what a horrible waste of two first round picks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.