Wrong Direction Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I wonder what fans actually expect from all of this? Are any of you surprised? Did they not expect owners to lock the players out? Do they not expect D Smith to take a hard line in negotiations/legal angles? Do they not expect Goodell to try to curry favor with fans and divide the players (yesterday's op-ed)? Both sides are in the middle of a multi-billion dollar a year negotiation. They would be incompetent if they weren't playing every card they have, both legally and from a PR angle. Smith and Goodell are NOT incompetent. The fact that so many are caught up in what amounts to the 2nd quarter of this fight is very interesting to me. Here's what fans should expect. The doomsday scenario Goodell painted won't come to fruition. The draft, free agency, etc., will continue to exist, maybe with small negotiated tweaks. Movement on negotiations will happen on smaller issues over the summer, like a rookie salary scale and retirement health coverage. Movement on the biggest issue - the player's % of the pie - will be a huge sticking point well into the summer and possibly into the season. Minus the owners being totally eviscerated legally (something I think is impossible over the short run), expect a very late deal at best. Don't expect a meaningful preseason. Expect a somewhat shortened season. This is a very real possibility. At some point they'll make a deal, games will be played this year and the Redskins will win the championship, because that's what we do after strikes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSkins Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 After looking over the complaint I'm wondering how Von Miller became a named member of the player class. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Tris Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 After looking over the complaint I'm wondering how Von Miller became a named member of the player class. To represent players eligible for the draft but not yet members of the former NFLPA. Their interests matter as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeSkins Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 To represent players eligible for the draft but not yet members of the former NFLPA. Their interests matter as well. Not why, but how. It's litigation stemming from de-certification of a union he was never a member of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 because that's what we do after strikes. But do we after lockouts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SittingBull Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 To get rid of the CBA is indeed to slay the golden goose but it is the owners who got rid of it not the players. They were using the lockout as leverage to get what they gave back and now it has backfired. The players would happily play on the terms of the old CBA. His piece was written as if his doomsday scenario is what the players are after when the owners are the one that brought this on in the first place. That being said the NFL will NEVER become like european soccer because the owners will never as you say slay the golden goose. It is a scare tactic that accomplishes nothing. It looks bad because he comes off as whining about a situation that he brought on and bringing up scenarios that is possible but that rational minds know they will never allow to get to that point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pedro Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 How long till the ruling on the stay? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88Comrade2000 Posted April 27, 2011 Share Posted April 27, 2011 I figure the appellate court will rule in favor of the players and league year will begin maybe as early as next week. As for a CBA agreement; that won't be happening anytime soon. It took 6 years from the 87 strike before there was an agreement and I figure the court process will take as long. The NFL will play under some court determined rules in the meantime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKM311 Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 To get rid of the CBA is indeed to slay the golden goose but it is the owners who got rid of it not the players. They were using the lockout as leverage to get what they gave back and now it has backfired. The players would happily play on the terms of the old CBA. His piece was written as if his doomsday scenario is what the players are after when the owners are the one that brought this on in the first place. That being said the NFL will NEVER become like european soccer because the owners will never as you say slay the golden goose. It is a scare tactic that accomplishes nothing. It looks bad because he comes off as whining about a situation that he brought on and bringing up scenarios that is possible but that rational minds know they will never allow to get to that point. Not true. The true leverage is the owners are richer than the players. That is what it will come to if the players don't truly try and compromise. ---------- Post added April-28th-2011 at 12:54 AM ---------- I figure the appellate court will rule in favor of the players and league year will begin maybe as early as next week.As for a CBA agreement; that won't be happening anytime soon. It took 6 years from the 87 strike before there was an agreement and I figure the court process will take as long. The NFL will play under some court determined rules in the meantime. Talked to a lawyer. No way it takes that long. They said, back then the risk vs. reward for the owners and players were a lot less than it is today. No one is willing to risk what they have now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
88Comrade2000 Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Not true. The true leverage is the owners are richer than the players. That is what it will come to if the players don't truly try and compromise.---------- Post added April-28th-2011 at 12:54 AM ---------- Talked to a lawyer. No way it takes that long. They said, back then the risk vs. reward for the owners and players were a lot less than it is today. No one is willing to risk what they have now. Maybe not 6 years but there will not be a CBA this year unless the owners win. If the players win, then I see them just playing the season under court approved rules for 2011 and everything gets pushed into 2012 before some final CBA deal is reached. There doesn't have to be a CBA for the 2011 season to be played. All that has to happen is that the owners lose in the Appellate round. They lose- the league is reopened. It's going to alot longer to reach a deal and I see nothing happening this year if the players win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hail2skins Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Does this mean the judge has denied the stay? Sounds like it........ http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=6439599 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ingtar Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 yes. Now they will ask for the same from the Court of Appeals Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLF Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Stay has been denied. Now NFL will have to go to 8th circuit. Would be great if anybody knew If free agency can start or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
authentic Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Yeah, FA should start immediately! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Still not totally clear, but Schefter just tweeted "Judge ordered NFL to start its league year immediately, but said no team is obligated to sign free agents. Trades in question." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AKM311 Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Maybe not 6 years but there will not be a CBA this year unless the owners win. If the players win, then I see them just playing the season under court approved rules for 2011 and everything gets pushed into 2012 before some final CBA deal is reached. There doesn't have to be a CBA for the 2011 season to be played. All that has to happen is that the owners loose in the Appellate round. The loose- the league is reopened. It's going to alot longer to reach a deal and I see nothing happening this year if the players win. Keep in mind, it keeps the rising stars under bad contracts for 6 years. The players will lose a lot of money that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unforgiven Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Schefter also just tweeted: "Judge's 20 page order takes her 89 page order from Mon and hits the major points even harder.*Makes NFL's attempt to get overturned harder." ---------- Post added April-27th-2011 at 10:02 PM ---------- Also... "League will tell the teams to hold pending 8th Circuit Ruling on the stay, NFLPA's position is it can't. Going to be interesting." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HLF Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Still not totally clear, but Schefter just tweeted "Judge ordered NFL to start its league year immediately, but said no team is obligated to sign free agents. Trades in question." Why wouldnt anybody want to If they need to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero21 Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 Why wouldnt anybody want to If they need to? Seriously. what a weird way to phrase that. they aren't obligated to sign anyone? of course not. maybe they just want to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrJL Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 I hope teams can trade players tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 I pray to god Allen is on the phone with Mannings agent right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidGQ Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 She needs to be more clear. So the lock out is lifted but it's ok for the league not to sign any players. What about trades? What about players working out at the facility? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dadyjr Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 How big would it be if we could trade players for picks tomorrow. That would be huge! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DavidGQ Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 I pray to god Allen is on the phone with Mannings agent right now. So we are going to sign another aging player? I think the league can "collude" and tell teams not to sign or trade until after the Appeal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted April 28, 2011 Share Posted April 28, 2011 So we are going to sign another aging player? In this instance HELL YES. This is Manning we are talking about here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.