SkinnedAussie Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 He received neither jail time nor a fine but is appealing anyway, Obviously, the two women don't think so! saying a larger principle is at stake. I know is starts with 'p', but principle isn't the word I was thinking of! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NattyLight Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 My wife and I would be doin' 25 to life... In other news, I'm completely SHOCKED that this story is coming out of VA... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanCollins Posted December 18, 2009 Share Posted December 18, 2009 this is just absolute horse**** Look at the facts of the case. Two women, on the same day heard him making noises to get their attention and then saw him facing them full frontal in a picture window and he made eye contact with them, never attempting to remove himself or cover himself. Sounds like the definition of indecent exposure to me. "Fairfax County Prosecutor Marc Birnbaum said the witness testimony shows that he intended to expose himself to the women by making himself visible for extended periods of time and drawing attention to himself by making rattling noises and singing. "No one deserves to see it, certainly not a young child," Birnbaum said." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polywog999 Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 The police claim he was deliberately exposing himself at the window, as opposed to accidentally being spotted while in his own house naked. That's what this case will depend on, at least I hope so. He's only crime was not being 'Buff-enough.' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
polywog999 Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 Look at the facts of the case. Two women, on the same day heard him making noises to get their attention and then saw him facing them full frontal in a picture window and he made eye contact with them, never attempting to remove himself or cover himself. Sounds like the definition of indecent exposure to me."Fairfax County Prosecutor Marc Birnbaum said the witness testimony shows that he intended to expose himself to the women by making himself visible for extended periods of time and drawing attention to himself by making rattling noises and singing. "No one deserves to see it, certainly not a young child," Birnbaum said." If this was the case, my summary judgment was woefully incorrect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HailGreen28 Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 CONVICTEDFAIRFAX, Va. - As Erick Williamson sees it, being naked is liberating, and if passers-by get an eyeful while he's standing in front of a picture window, that's not his problem. A Fairfax County judge saw it a little differently Friday, convicting Williamson of indecent exposure in a case that has raised questions about what's OK when you're in your own home. Two women said they saw much more of Williamson than they cared to in October, even though he never left the confines of his home. He received neither jail time nor a fine but is appealing anyway, saying a larger principle is at stake. Click for full story Well looks like the police canvassing the neighborhood and going door to door, the flyers to the schools, and lord knows what gossip, actually managed to produce something! Two witnesses! :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiebear Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 I was skeptical when you find out the "Woman" is a cops wife.. Anyone else and they'd tell the woman to stop looking into other peoples houses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostyj Posted December 19, 2009 Share Posted December 19, 2009 Has anyone ever heard someone sing in a house while you were driving by in a car? I shure havent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimboDaMan Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 I was skeptical when you find out the "Woman" is a cops wife..Anyone else and they'd tell the woman to stop looking into other peoples houses. Perhaps you were correct in your skepticism.Va. man acquitted of indecent exposure in his home From the article: A man charged with indecent exposure after two women said they saw him naked inside his own home was acquitted Wednesday by a Virginia jury.Erick Williamson, 29, has argued since his October arrest that he should not be punished for being naked in the privacy of his own home. Police and prosecutors, as well as the two women who testified against him, said he intended to expose himself and made no attempt to conceal himself in a residential neighborhood filled with children. "It's really a weight off my shoulders after these last six months," Williamson said after his acquittal. "I think (the verdict) kind of sets the record straight. It was an innocent action." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 Great news Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichmondRedskin88 Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 Yeah, then that would be like offsetting penalties.:hysterical: Repeat First Down!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daddys little skins fan Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 Blame Cosmo. Practically every other issue features an article urging Women to try and perform their daily activities in the nude. True fact. Gender equality. Woot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 Blame Cosmo. Practically every other issue features an article urging Women to try and perform their daily activities in the nude. True fact. Gender equality. Woot. Really? Damn.. How much is a subscription?...I wanna corrupt the old lady:D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frostyj Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 Va. jury: Naked in own home not indecent Prosecutors, two women say man intended to expose himself FAIRFAX, Va. - A man charged with indecent exposure after two women said they saw him naked inside his own home was acquitted Wednesday by a Virginia jury. Glad this was overturned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanCollins Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 Fairfax Naked Guy -- Not Guilty A Fairfax County Circuit Court jury took less than 20 minutes Wednesday to find Erick Williamson, "The Naked Guy," not guilty of indecent exposure, for standing nude inside his Springfield house last fall. "It's a weight off my shoulders," Williamson said of the verdict, which was an appeal of his misdemeanor conviction by a judge in Fairfax General District Court. "I think it sets the record straight. It was an innocent action." EARLIER: The appeal trial for The Naked Guy, Erick Williamson, got underway in Fairfax County Circuit Court on Wednesday, after Williamson appealed his conviction for indecent exposure while inside his Springfield house last fall. Though Fairfax prosecutors limited their case strictly to the two women who say they saw Williamson, 29, standing naked at the door to his carport on Oct. 19, one new detail did emerge today: Yvette Dean, who testified she was walking her 7-year-old son to school that fateful morning, said that when she spotted Williamson posing in the doorway, "I flipped him off." Sounded like this guy was guilty, anyone know why it was overturned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.T.real,lights,out Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 What? U cant walk around naked in your own house? WTF? lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RVAbrendan Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 Good. It's his own property, an obvious innocent action, and it's the freaking human body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted April 8, 2010 Share Posted April 8, 2010 How did they arrest him? If someone came up to me and was like "Were you naked at 5;30am this morning?" I would just deny. How would the accusers prove it? Did they have pictures? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.