theboomking Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 He doesn't play OL...I'm just sayin'... We have a lot of needs on this team. Griffin is getting older and is never healthy, and it looks like we're getting rid of Monty. We definitely need a DT. If we could get Dorsey for Monty and a 7, we would be younger and deeper on the DL. Merriman looks to have lost "it" at this point, and is a huge headache. The last this this D needs is another big ego with mediocre production. We would be blasted if we brought Merriman here and he didn't produce. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Probos Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 Sure -- but doesn't he play on the defensive line? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 We have a lot of needs on this team. Griffin is getting older and is never healthy, and it looks like we're getting rid of Monty. We definitely need a DT. If we could get Dorsey for Monty and a 7, we would be younger and deeper on the DL. Merriman looks to have lost "it" at this point, and is a huge headache. The last this this D needs is another big ego with mediocre production. We would be blasted if we brought Merriman here and he didn't produce. Great, so lets continue to ignore the offensive line in an attempt to upgrade EVERY other position like we've been doing for years! Let's trade picks for Derrick Johnson, Roscoe Parrish and Glenn Dorsey. Perhaps we can even trade some picks for Brady Quinn! And we all know we should have traded picks for Braylon Edwards. That would give us a championship! Oh wait, we'd still have D'Anthony Batiste starting on our offense line. Enough with the "We have other holes" stuff. We have HUGE holes on the OL. Bigger than any other position besides maybe QB. And unless you get an ELITE QB, the OL is much more important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempre_victrix Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 We need to get younger and better on the O-Line. Heyer is probably not going to cut it long term and Rhinehart has barely made the active list. We are paying for the "we want it right now, microwave" attitude that he pervaded this organization for years. Let's trade away the future for vets on the downside of their career rather than build from the draft and select, solid trades. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gutlead74 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 Unless he can play OL no Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsTerps26 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 i would love to have dorsey and haynesworth teamed up with orakpo. can u say dominant D line for the next 6 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempre_victrix Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 i would love to have dorsey and haynesworth teamed up with orakpo. can u say dominant D line for the next 6 years? Unless those guys can also run and pass block, can you say bottom 5 offense for those same years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmast000 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 If they would take Monty for him straight up Id take him and use him at tackle. Anything is better then Golston. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 You all realize we'd take on his contract in a trade too, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 Any new blood that comes into DC needs to be young, hungry, and through the draft. We need to have a fire sale of what we have and reboot this mother****er. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSHRedskins3ATLBraves3 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 Unless those guys can also run and pass block, can you say bottom 5 offense for those same years? Exactly our o-line is the biggest problem. More d-linemen won't help that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDawg Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 Exactly our o-line is the biggest problem.More d-linemen won't help that. It's amazing how few people actually get that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rdskn4Lyf21 Posted October 14, 2009 Share Posted October 14, 2009 It's amazing how few people actually get that. ....as well as those running the organization :doh: Don't get me wrong, I loved the signing of Big Al and drafting of Rak but we had more important issues at hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penteboss Posted October 15, 2009 Author Share Posted October 15, 2009 You all realize we'd take on his contract in a trade too, right? I dont really know much about contracts, but according to the link the the original post his contract is not absurd at all.for those of you that know a lot of contracts and finances here what rotoworld.com says.... http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_contract.aspx?sport=NFL&id=4661 It's amazing how few people actually get that. I'm very aware that is the Skins' main problem, but with not many free agents on the market right now, and not much of a 2010 free agent OL class (yes there is the jahri evans and marcus mcneil but I can guarantee they'll get contracts before they get the chance to test FA waters) I think it would be best to just draft new lineman. I think it's good oppotunity to get younger and more talented on an aging dline. Also... Golson, Alexander, and Monty are in contract years. So even some of our younger DTs may not be with washington next year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt Rich Fla Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 **** NO! Enough of this **** of getting people without jobs, and if Merriman shows up here I'll stick my hand in a bush hog, I swear. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iMeast Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 Only if he is cheap ... I am way more worried about the offensive line. HTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reaganaut Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 Can someone please ban these people who are flooding the board with stupid posts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFTW Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 Just what the Skins need. More defensive players. How about kidnapping Croyle? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TGI Jef Posted October 15, 2009 Share Posted October 15, 2009 i dont want Dorsey, but i especially dont want Merriman in case no one has noticed, the dude is playing like absolute garbage this year after talking big in the offseason and coming off a horrible injury. i can honestly say that signing Merriman might be the only thing that would piss me off more than trading draft picks for Brady Quinn, as crazy as that sounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskinzfan30 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 If they would take Monty for him straight up Id take him and use him at tackle. Anything is better then Golston. This. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
method man Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 I think some of you people banging the drums for the OLine should look at this from a long-term perspective. It is unlikely we are going to be competitive next year with the FA class this year being restricted FAs. Thus, we have 2 years to fix the OLine. So, if we took someone like Ndamakong Suh or Gerald McCoy in the draft (and it is not over a potential franchise QB like Jake Locker) I will be happy, because we took the BPA and are setting our DLine up to be the core of a top 5 D when we are competitive in 2 years or so. Again, some of you people who keep clamoring for OLinemen should maybe do some research on this draft and realize that there are really no OLinemen worth taking in the top 10 and, if we were to take a single one of them, even Okung, it would be a reach. If you did your research, you would know that this OLine class is deep and we can get some decent OLinemen in the 2nd round and later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskinzfan30 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 I think some of you people banging the drums for the OLine should look at this from a long-term perspective. It is unlikely we are going to be competitive next year with the FA class this year being restricted FAs. Thus, we have 2 years to fix the OLine. So, if we took someone like Ndamakong Suh or Gerald McCoy in the draft (and it is not over a potential franchise QB like Jake Locker) I will be happy, because we took the BPA and are setting our DLine up to be the core of a top 5 D when we are competitive in 2 years or so. Again, some of you people who keep clamoring for OLinemen should maybe do some research on this draft and realize that there are really no OLinemen worth taking in the top 10 and, if we were to take a single one of them, even Okung, it would be a reach. If you did your research, you would know that this OLine class is deep and we can get some decent OLinemen in the 2nd round and later. The current problem is that the defense is on the field too long. By not adding anything to the offense that only worsens the problem. We should go QB or O-Line in the first round nothing else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justsomeguy Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 O-Line only please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veretax Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 We don't need help on the Dline so no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskinzfan30 Posted October 16, 2009 Share Posted October 16, 2009 We don't need help on the Dline so no. I'd be for it if it was Dorsey for Monty. Nothing else was added in but the Chiefs would have to be stupid to accept that deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.