footballhenry Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 As of today, who would you VOTE for President in either party? Not necessarily who you think will win but rather choose the candidate that best represents your values and your ideas about the countries future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toe Jam Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Barack. End of story. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Guy. Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Hillary Clinton because Bill would be back in the Whitehouse. You know he would run that ****. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 I'd have to go Fred Thompson, only because he's about as conservative a pick as there is out there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Spiff Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Who has the best looking wife? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rincewind Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Hillary Clinton because Bill would be back in the Whitehouse. You know he would run that ****. Anybody else notice that when Bill was in office people claimed Hillary ran the show, and now that Hillary is running, people are claiming that if she wins Bill will run the show? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toe Jam Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Who has the best looking wife? Hillary. :laugh::laugh::laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.Guy. Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 Anybody else notice that when Bill was in office people claimed Hillary ran the show, and now that Hillary is running, people are claiming that if she wins Bill will run the show? I notice it. But it doesn't bother me as the Clinton Administration felt a lot more competent than Bush 1 and 2. I don't know it just seemed America was in more capable hands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Spiff Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 I notice it. But it doesn't bother me as the Clinton Administration felt a lot more competent than Bush 1 and 2. I don't know it just seemed America was in more capable hands. America would be in more capable hands with my 6 month old puppy. It wouldn't be a stretch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 I notice it. But it doesn't bother me as the Clinton Administration felt a lot more competent than Bush 1 and 2. I don't know it just seemed America was in more capable hands. Unless you were in the military Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted December 2, 2007 Share Posted December 2, 2007 You left off "None of the above" as a choice. Anyone I pick from that list would be "settling". And my guess is that would also be true for a lot of other people too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footballhenry Posted December 2, 2007 Author Share Posted December 2, 2007 For the Ron Paul supporters, and those that want to learn more about his views here is a great website put together on his behalf--> www.RonPaulLibrary.org Liberty 2008 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
twa Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Thompson at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cdowwe Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Chose Freddy T. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NoCalMike Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Kucinich. Honestly, my views fall in line with him more then any other Democrat running. Since it will likely come down to Hillary or Obama. Out of those two, definately Obama. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoGood28 Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 You left off "None of the above" as a choice. Anyone I pick from that list would be "settling". And my guess is that would also be true for a lot of other people too. You can't have "none of the above" as President. It is your duty as a citizen to vote for the candidate that you believe will be the best for this country. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrumanB Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 You can't have "none of the above" as President. It is your duty as a citizen to vote for the candidate that you believe will be the best for this country. Oh, yes I can. It is certainly my right not to vote. Not saying I would do that, but it seems like every presidential election (primary and general) gets worse in terms of the choices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_cavalierman Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 I am tired of the division between the parties with no progress... I am tired of republicones and democlones The two guys that actually represent change are Paul and O'Bama O'Bama seems a little more credible than Paul so I'll go with O'Bama Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footballhenry Posted December 3, 2007 Author Share Posted December 3, 2007 Members of the Council on Foreign Relations? Fred Thompson Rudy Giuliani John McCain Mitt Romney Jim Gilmore Newt Gingrich Hillary Clinton Barack Obama John Edwards Joe Biden Chris Dodd Bill Richardson Who Opposes the CFR? Ron Paul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokerPacker Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 oh noes, more internet spamming by the ron paul club! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarge Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 oh noes, more internet spamming by the ron paul club! That's where this is heading Tomorrow morning there will be 70,000 votes for Ron Paul, even though only 8 people in the whole country support him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DoGood28 Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 Oh, yes I can. It is certainly my right not to vote. Not saying I would do that, but it seems like every presidential election (primary and general) gets worse in terms of the choices. No, you can't. Someone is going to be President. You may have the right not to vote, but you are actually doing more harm by not voting for the closest candidate to your choice than to allow everyone else to make the choice for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footballhenry Posted December 3, 2007 Author Share Posted December 3, 2007 That's where this is headingTomorrow morning there will be 70,000 votes for Ron Paul, even though only 8 people in the whole country support him What are you talking about? The man raises millions of dollars in a single day (Nov 5th, 2007) and has a beautiful message that millions like myself find great comfort and hope in; but yet he has little to no support? I'll be blunt, your wrong. He has millions of supporters; the response to his message has been incredible and truly resonates with the younger generations that truly see through this corrupt political system in America. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman Spiff Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 I've seen signs above highways for the Ron Paul Revolution recently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PokerPacker Posted December 3, 2007 Share Posted December 3, 2007 I've seen signs above highways for the Ron Paul Revolution recently. don't worry, that's just internet spam. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.