Koolblue13 Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Video_tribute_to_Giuliani_911_lies_0530.html I would just like to know. I would also like to know why everybody was not warned, more lives could have been saved. He said they were trying to evacuate when they came down, but how much time did they have? I know this video is annoying, but it asks the question. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tizzod Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Rudi Johnson? The Bengals running back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 I heard it was OJ. He called him from the liberal media base of operations located deep beneath the Atlantic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Mark Brunell? :whoknows: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted June 1, 2007 Author Share Posted June 1, 2007 Happy, I fixed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard Washington Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 but the towers did collapse...what's the big deal? also if he knew before hand (days/hours) why would he be so close to the action? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted June 1, 2007 Author Share Posted June 1, 2007 but the towers did collapse...what's the big deal? also if he knew before hand (days/hours) why would he be so close to the action?I assume that it was minutes at the most, but that still could have saved lives. Why wern't the people in the building told, the firefighters?The big deal is it might haved saved lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
helptheSKINS Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Koolblue, are you ever going to stop this? This seems consistant with your theory. He didn't try to get them out so as many people as possible would die. I think you may be obsessed with this. And his name is Rudy Giuliani. I would think someone with as much knowledge on this conspiracy theory as you could atleast spell his name right. According to this and your former posts, his name is spelled Rudi Julliani. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterMP Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 They've admitted that they had massive communication problems and cooperation issues that day. They over hauled their communications system, and people are still complaining that it isn't good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EersSkins05 Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 but the towers did collapse...what's the big deal? also if he knew before hand (days/hours) why would he be so close to the action? Well, the emergency operations center was located below Tower 1. Despite the fact that they told him not to build it there after the attack in '93. But he did anyway. So he didn't have an office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted June 1, 2007 Author Share Posted June 1, 2007 Koolblue, are you ever going to stop this? This seems consistant with your theory. He didn't try to get them out so as many people as possible would die. I think you may be obsessed with this. And his name is Rudy Giuliani. I would think someone with as much knowledge on this conspiracy theory as you could atleast spell his name right. According to this and your former posts, his name is spelled Rudi Julliani.Thanks for the great feedback. You are very helpful and informative once again. And I already fixed it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted June 1, 2007 Author Share Posted June 1, 2007 Well, the emergency operations center was located below Tower 1. Despite the fact that they told him not to build it there after the attack in '93. But he did anyway.So he didn't have an office. He had a bunker in building 7, next to the fuel cells that exploded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dchogs Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 I assume that it was minutes at the most, but that still could have saved lives. Why wern't the people in the building told, the firefighters?The big deal is it might haved saved lies. it's not like there was a telephone tree that could have been used. i also have to assume that people in the towers were already trying to get out of them because they were on freakin' fire already. lastly, the firefighters that i know would have rushed in faster if they were told the towers were coming down in a couple minutes. the way i interpreted rudy's statement was that he was in one of the towers, someone came in and said "we have to get out of here, it's going to collapse," and they got out of dodge (and still got trapped themselves despite this "advanced" warning). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popeman38 Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Coming next week, another 9/11 conspiracy thread! Lather, rinse, repeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PleaseBlitz Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 And his name is Rudy Giuliani. I would think someone with as much knowledge on this conspiracy theory as you could atleast spell his name right. According to this and your former posts, his name is spelled Rudi Julliani. It was Julliani before Skull & Bones made him change it. :paranoid: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G.A.C.O.L.B. Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 I don't believe this for the same reason I don't believe FDR knew about Pearl Harbor ahead of time. What did they have to lose by saving lives? Just the act itself is enough to declare war. They don't have to stretch it out to have thousands of deaths so they can declare war. If that makes sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted June 1, 2007 Author Share Posted June 1, 2007 So the fact that he was told the building were coming down and nobody else was warned is no big deal? Then why does he lie about saying it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mooka Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 You really think a single firefighter or policeman in those buildings didn't think that at any second the whole thing could come down on them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Koolblue13 Posted June 1, 2007 Author Share Posted June 1, 2007 You really think a single firefighter or policeman in those buildings didn't think that at any second the whole thing could come down on them?Well, according to the tapes of the firefighters on the floors with the worst fires, no. Same with the guys in the stairwells who had thier fires out. They were all saying the fires were under control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Who told him? We did. Remlik. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterMP Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 So the fact that he was told the building were coming down and nobody else was warned is no big deal? Then why does he lie about saying it? I think the way the video is setup that HE thinks SHE means far in advance. Why would he intentionally lie when there is video tape evidence that he said it? Cetainly any wide reaching conspiracy would know of that tape. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popeman38 Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 I think the way the video is setup that HE thinks SHE means far in advance. Why would he intentionally lie when there is video tape evidence that he said it? Cetainly any wide reaching conspiracy would know of that tape.Did anyone else notice that the tape said it was RE-EDITED by some dude on myspace? Not a reputable source, myspace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tizzod Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 So the fact that he was told the building were coming down and nobody else was warned is no big deal? Then why does he lie about saying it? Because he is a bloodthirsty murderer who loves nothing more than destroying tourist attractions that bring revenue to his city and killing police and firefighters that are supposed to protect the entire city. He is a horrible, brutal person who has no regard for humans. He only serves his president's whims, therefore proving the government is the mastermind behind 9/11. Happy now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Om Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 I've not followed all the 911 conspiracy threads here for a while. One question that pops to mind now that I've skimmed this one ... Koolblue is either a pretty smart instigator type, who knows enough to walk JUST up to the line before moving off to find another line to play with before getting pinned down on the former one ... or just a not very smart reader/processor of the written word. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Maybe it was the Jews? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpeg.3d05d94a5044fa9ada2aa8cc7156fc2a.jpeg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.