[[ghost]] Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 even if he wasn't joking- why make such a big deal out of a troll? thats exactly what they want you to do. chill out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carter23 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 last night i was playing poker at a kids house (won 35 bucks with a 10 dollar by in for 5 people!) and a jet fan who was there screamed out "Santana Moss!" when coles scored his second TD.... so i told him that with his 2 tds he still (pretty much) has half of Moss' td's jet fans will never learn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Come on, we all know all Moss does is run deep and catch fly routes. Coles is the much better overall WR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrypticVillain Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Man the way Moss catch them Screens is unbelieveable. Coles was a cry baby and I rather have a ok reciever who wants to win then have a superstar receiver who always complain about not getting the ball when he had 90 catches :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCRoughrider Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 As shocking as it is, Laveraneous Coles and Chris Cooley have almost identical stats. They both have 69 receptions. They both have 766 yards. Coles longest catch is 31 yards, Cooley's is 32 yards. Chris has 7 touchdowns, Coles has 5, though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richanathai Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 It's all about numbers baby.....who goes to the superbowl has better numbers than the others and who wins it all too. So Moss beats Coles anyday. I like Coles but Moss kicks some butt. Look at his yards after first contact, impeccable. For all you doubters, u'r all a**holes. Go skins Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krsone Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 You're not serious are you? Clearly he was being sarcastic. sarcasm is useless on the internet unless it is clear cut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 sarcasm is useless on the internet unless it is clear cut. Please...I've seen diamonds cut less clearly than that guy's "Moss was lucky" comment...lol...It was obvious sarcasm. I created a thread saying the Skins got "lucky" when they beat Dallas 35-7 because the Cowboys "clearly dominated the Skins for the first 4 minutes of the game", and that it wasn't until the "last 56 minutes of the game that the Skins scored those five lucky TDs"...I actually got flamed as being a troll on that thread! :laugh:...more than a few people thought I was being serious, and felt they had to call me out and put me in my place. :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Holy broken sarcasm detectors Batman... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. Are you on crack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
G-Prime Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 I sometimes think.. What if.. Moss our Number 1 and Coles our number 2 =( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wahoos911 Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 moss is more talented than coles someone said he wasnt... just sayin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ntotoro Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 Ahhh... Gang Green has some really bizarre stuff in the water. Stuff like this: You guys do realize that all of Moss' catches this year were on long routes. It's not like he "earns" any of his yards. He did have a nice broken tackle in the 3Q today to score, but it was still open field after that.Coles catches balls over the middle, overthrown, short, long, etc. Coles is a more complete WR. He, just like Moss had a really good year his first year with the Redskins. Nevermind Coles' injury and the fact that he hasn't been the same since game #3 of his first year here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asnpcwiz Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 These people on theganggreen are on crack. Do they not realize that the most fundamental and difficult thing to teach a receiver is how to run a proper route?!? I mean, Moss gets open because he runs his routes correctly. That isn't luck. It's something called SKILL. I mean, by no means was the pass by Patrick Ramsey this weekend a perfect throw, but Moss made the play...he caugh the ball and made it in for a TD. Regardless, the "better" receiver shouldn't have less yards, or TD's...you get lucky for 1-2 more plays...not 600+ more yards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyfar Posted December 27, 2005 Share Posted December 27, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. I wish I had some of what you're smokin. EDIT: Okay I saw that it was meant as a joke. I still wish I had some of what you were smoking to think that was funny j/k Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atloldskin Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Even if the numbers were reversed, Moss WANTS to be here! That is what matters most, plus he is much better than Coles! Just another bad trade for Joe Gibbs I guess!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkart Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 The Redskins Got Santana Claus and the Jets got Coles in their stocking!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs is the man Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Laveranues who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gibbs is the man Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 The Redskins Got Santana Claus and the Jets got Coles in their stocking!! LMAO:eaglesuck :gaintsuck :dallasuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WHALEN Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 But let's be honest, most of Moss' plays are lucky. Coles is clearly the better reciever. Lucky you have to be ****ting me!!!! That guy's a flat out track star with blazing speed, he gets open and has soft hands nothing lucky about what that man has accompleshed this year christ he's been tourching secondary's all year. Lucky Please :eaglesuck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camyj15 Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Santana Moss is a playmaker - Coles isn't. It's that simple. Moss is a great athlete in addition to being a good wide receiver. I get the feeling he could have played about any sport and excelled. I don't get this sense with Coles, he is just a good football player. If you ever notice all of the great playmakers (regardless of sport) with very few exceptions, are excellent athletes that give you the feel that they would excel at any sport. Moss is such an athlete. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prosperity Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 Moss didn't earn any of his yards like LC, duh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 You're not serious are you? Clearly he was being sarcastic. Well, I am serious. I am always deadly serious. I even have a serious song I sing when I want to make it clear to people just how serious I am. I call it The Serious Song. These are serious things you need to know about me. Seriously. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PA Skin Fan Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 As shocking as it is, Laveraneous Coles and Chris Cooley have almost identical stats. They both have 69 receptions. They both have 766 yards. Coles longest catch is 31 yards, Cooley's is 32 yards.Chris has 7 touchdowns, Coles has 5, though. hahahahahahahahahaha :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: That was a GREAT post! I'm laughing my head off! Cooley > Coles (toe man)! HTTR! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted December 28, 2005 Share Posted December 28, 2005 There's something to be said about being able to pick up the tone of the post you're reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.