Morrison J

Meh I like Fitz as a guy but it's not a move that excites me. Not a great fit either. Fitz is just a bit reckless for my taste. I'd prefer someone a bit more careful with the ball when we have the defense behind us that we do. It's a necessary upgrade at least. Hopefully he proves me wrong.

There's levels to this though. Haskins is probably only as good as a one legged Heinicke.

Darby just lost sight of the ball there completely.

One thing I miss about the Gruden era: The scripted opening drive which often led to points.

Our offense is just so so bad. Absolutely essential for us to have a run game to compete this year and we have nothing close to it. Haskins being asked to do way too much. We need to be more creative and use the speed of Gibson and Sims. Doesn't seem to be any innovation going on though. Really poor.

http://bfstrms.xyz/watch/nfl

Harmon is a very bad loss to such a thin receiving core.

Said it all summer, Mayfield is the man. Going to be the real deal.

http://buffstreamz.com/watch/nfl-2.php

Sounds very Leeds. Think we've had one season in the last ten where we've spent more money than we've sold. Get out of there before its too late I'd say!

If only Leeds were doing that well!

What has this got to do with me

I see your argument but would've been soft for me. Far too theatrical. I also think if Dele Alli did that against you you'd be labelling him a cheat and baying for his blood to be fair!

You can add in Ireland and Australia to the list of countries where most call it soccer too.

Flag does often shoot up quicker than it should yeah. Seen it many times. I said all along that Liverpool were unlucky to have all the big decisions go against them. By the letter of the law they got the offside 100% correct though so I don't see how one can blame the ref/linesman for doing their jobs correctly. There's no epiphanies, I'm being consistent with what I've said all along with everything. I thought I was being very fair throughout that whole discussion to be honest, you guys just didn't see it that way.

According to the rulebook he's then onside yes.

Not sure what I'm missing here. Any time I said the correct decision was made it was in the context of the offside part of the decision. I'm still genuinely not even 100% sure about the Kane dive part as it's not a clear call. Every call in football isn't plain black and white unfortunately. My summary though was that Liverpool were very unlucky to have so many close calls not go their way. I stick by that. Let it go GHH.

I'm not getting into another mad debate but I called the Kane penalty decision harsh at the time if you read back.

Ah I'd never defend blatant diving to be fair.

Yeah it's every game now really he does something. England international's always get preferential treatment when it comes to these things which isn't right.

Video isn't working but I presume it's the Ali dive from earlier. Terrible dive I agree 100%. He should be punished at this stage no doubt.

This puts it to bed anyway. Decision was the correct one even if they made a bit of a balls of the process in giving it. Wonder if Klopp will come out and apologise for not knowing the rules of the game and wrongly calling the referee inadequate.

Hopefully this clears it up:

That's the rule according to the book so I don't see Clattenburg's argument to be honest. These rules are made in order to give the benefit to the attacking team and that's exactly what happened. "Deliberate" means any attempt to play the ball that results in a touch. The mere fact that it causes so much debate means Liverpool were pretty unfortunate to come out the wrong end of it to be fair. I do think the correct decision overall was probably made though. Yeah I respect the linesman for putting himself out there to be honest too. Most would shirk from the responsibility in that position.