daveakl Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 So I just heard somebody say that Jon Ireland said on his show that he can create of five of any of the great Lakers and it would beat any team from any of the other teams in the league. So this is who he came up with... PG-Magic SG-Kobe F-Elgin Baylor F-James Worthy C-Kareem lol Nice list, but no.... Did he mean any 5 from the entire league, or any five from one team. How about Miami: G-Wade G-Hardaway F-Bosh F-James C-Shaq 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrypticVillain Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 (edited) So I just heard somebody say that Jon Ireland said on his show that he can create of five of any of the great Lakers and it would beat any team from any of the other teams in the league. So this is who he came up with... PG-Magic SG-Kobe F-Elgin Baylor F-James Worthy C-Kareem lol Nice list, but no.... Did he mean any 5 from the entire league, or any five from one team. How about Miami: G-Wade G-Hardaway F-Bosh F-James C-Shaq Nope, he actually said any five from all the teams in the league combined lol Edited August 9, 2013 by MLSKINS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte51Coleman Posted August 9, 2013 Share Posted August 9, 2013 From that group I'd drop Isiah, add Bird, and let LBJ match up with Magic. 1. Magic vs Lebron 2. Jordan vs Kobe 3. Bird vs Worthy 4. Duncan vs Baylor 5. Hakeem vs Kareem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 So I just heard somebody say that Jon Ireland said on his show that he can create of five of any of the great Lakers and it would beat any team from any of the other teams in the league. So this is who he came up with... PG-Magic SG-Kobe F-Elgin Baylor F-James Worthy C-Kareem lol Nice list, but no.... Did he mean any 5 from the entire league, or any five from one team. How about Miami: G-Wade G-Hardaway F-Bosh F-James C-Shaq Nope, he actually said any five from all the teams in the league combined lol Well he's just wrong then. Not even close. FWIW, my 5 would be: PG: Oscar SG: Jordan SF: LeBron, though Bird would work too. PF: Duncan C: Russell (Does Wilt qualify?) That team would be unspeakably good. Magic and Kareem are the only ones who could rightfully crack that group. And even still, Oscar and Russell is basically as good as they are. It's not even close at the other three positions. Not only have you got the perfect mix of facilitators and scorers, but outside Oscar, you've pretty much got the best defensive line up that could be conceived. They'd kill that Lakers team. I think comparing LA's 5 against other franchise's 5 is interesting. I think the Celtics could take them, especially if you did a first and second team. Hell, Boston could field damn good third and fourth teams replete with HoFers at almost every spot: 1st team: PG: Bob Cousy SG: Sam Jones SF: Larry Bird PF: Kevin McHale C: Bill Russell 2nd team: PG: Tiny Archibald SG: Dennis Johnson SF: Hondo PF: Dave Cowens C: Robert Parish 3rd team: PG: KC Jones SG: Frank Ramsey SF: Bailey Howell PF: Kevin Garnett C: Bill Sharman 4th team: PG: JoJo White SG: Ray Allen SF: Paul Pierce PF: Satch Sanders C: Ed McCauley That's an incredible collection of talent. That third team could feasibly beat Washington's first team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Nobody would have the depth of HoFers that Boston would if you did multiple teams. But there are several organizations that would have surprisingly strong second and third teams. Houston, for example, would be pretty deep because of how awesome their big man tradition is. First team: PG: Calvin Murphy SG: Clyde SF: T-Mac PF: Elvin Hayes C: Hakeem/Moses You could have Sampson and Moses as your second team bigs. That's pretty dang good. Dwight wouldn't even crack the list because you still have Yao ahead of him. I'm not even considering Barkley or Pippen either, they don't really count as Rockets IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Portland fields a nice team. You forget how solid their NBA history is: G: Terry Porter G: Drexler F: Brandon Roy F: Bill Walton C: Sabonis One that really surprised me was OKC/Seattle. They've had a rich history of excellent players: 1st PG: Gary Payton SG: Ray Allen SF: Kevin Durant PF: Shawn Kemp C: Jack Sikma That team would be awesome. That franchise isn't the first that comes to mind when you think PG tradition, but theirs is one of the best. Behind Payton, they could also play Gus Willams, Lenny Wilkens, and even Russell Westbrook. This is fun, I'm going to keep coming up with these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 San Antonio, predictably good: PG: Tony Parker SG: Manu Ginobli SF: George Gervin PF: Duncan C: Robinson That was easy. They've got the most clearly defined top 5 of anyone, each fitting in nicely to their own position. And they'd still have Artis Gilmore on the bench. That team would beat most other team's best 5. Another good one, Golden State: PG: Tim Hardaway SG: Chris Mullin SF: Rick Barry PF: Nate Thurmond C: Wilt Chamberlain That team would be awesome to watch. Probably have the most scoring punch. They'd also have Paul Arizin, Neil Johnston, and Mitch Richmond on the bench. Plus you could probably add Steph Curry to that list. And I guess Robert Parrish technically, but he's a Celtic to me. The Warriors have a nice history. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Utah, pretty good: PG: Stockton SG: Pistol Pete SF: Adrian Dantley PF: Karl Malone C: Mark Eaton Darrell Griffith, Deron, AK47, and Boozer is actually a fairly respectable second line. Denver, solid group: PG: Fat Lever SG: David Thompson SF: Alex English PF: Carmelo? C: Dan Issel I suppose you could replace Carmelo at PF with Issel and put Mutumbo at C. I guess Mutumbo is a Nugget. Phoenix, awful defensively but a ton of fun: PG: Nash, but KJ comes really close SG: Walter Davis SF: Shawn Marion PF: Barkley C: Amar'e Decent bench options like Tom Chambers, KJ, Thunder Dan. Dallas, not the best: PG: Kidd SG: Rolando Blackman SF: Mark Aguirre PF: Dirk C: Roy Tarpley (really scraping the barrel) Their franchise history is abysmal outside the Dirk era. Clippers, surprisingly fun list. You'd think this group would be horrendous but it's actually not: PG: CP3 SG: World B. Free SF: Randy Smith PF: Elton Brand C: Bob McAdoo Sacramento, actually really good when you factor in their history in Cincinnati: PG: Oscar Robertson SG: Mitch Richmond SF: Jack Twyman PF: C-Webb C: Jerry Lucas New Orleans, solid when you factor in Charlotte: PG: CP3 SG: Dell Curry SF: Glen Rice PF: LJ C: Zo Minnesota: not worth doing. KG is literally the only great player they've had, though Love is on his way. You're looking at Wall Szcerbiak and Sam Cassell as the second and third best players in franchise history right now... Memphis: Same. That's the West. 1.) Lakers 2.) Spurs 3.) Warriors 4.) Rockets 5.) Kings/Royals 6.) Thunder/Sonics 7.) Blazers 8.) Jazz 9.) Suns 10.) Clippers 11.) Nuggets 12.) Pelicans/Hornets 13.) Dallas 14.) TWolves 15.) Grizzlies Alright, I'm done. I'll do the East another time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 I'd take Isiah Thomas out and add another SF that could shoot and defend. If you're going up against a 6'8 point guard in Magic Johnson you might as well just have Lebron playing PG full time. That makes sense. Bird then. I'd also swap out Hakeem for Russell probably. Russell was the greatest player of his era, him or Wilt would work. Duncan is the greatest player of his era. Jordan the greatest of his. LeBron the greatest of his. And Bird was the co-greatest of his era. That's be an unbelievable team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveakl Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Miami- Wade Hardaway James Bosh Shaq Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Shaq was only in Miami for three years and was only dominant for the first year. In the other two he missed almost as many games as he played. Almost all of Shaq's good years were in Orlando and LA. When you reflect on Shaq's career, he gets remembered as a member of the Magic or Lakers, not the Heat. I'd go with Zo as the C for Miami instead. He was a true member of that team, played their for ten years, and had his best years there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 (edited) Another way of looking at it: Shaq played just 15% of his career minutes in Miami. That's only a little bit more than Jordan played in DC, and both were in a similar state of decline at that point. Miami's title was all DWade in 2006-2007. Shaq only played 4 games that postseason, and only 40 games during the regular season. I don't think the Heat get to claim Shaq any more than the Wizards get to claim Jordan. Edited August 10, 2013 by stevemcqueen1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Here's my picks for the East. Knicks: PG: Walt Frazier SG: Earl Monroe SF: Dave DeBusschere PF: Willis Reed C: Patrick Ewing Celtics, already done, but recap: PG: Cousy SG: Hondo SF: Bird PF: McHale C: Russell 76ers: PG: Larry Costello (HoFer) SG: Allen Iverson SF: Dr. J PF: Charles Barkley C: Wilt Chamberlain Their second team would actually be fantastic: PG: Mo Cheeks SG: Hal Greer SF: Bobby Jones PF: Dolph Schayes C: Moses Malone Nets: PG: Jason Kidd SG: Drazen Petrovic SF: Vince Carter PF: Derrick Coleman C: Buck Williams Raptors: Not worth mentioning. Bulls: PG: Derrick Rose SG: Michael Jordan SF: Scottie Pippen PF: Bob Love C: Artis Gilmore Second team isn't terrible either, lots of old timers: PG: Norm Van Lier SG: Jerry Sloan SF: Chet Walker PF: Dennis Rodman C: Horace Grant Bucks: PG: Oscar Robertson SG: Sidney Moncrief SF: Marques Johnson or Glen Robinson PF: Terry Cummings C: Lew Alcindor/Kareem Abdul Jabbar Cavs, not as bad as you'd think. Not just LeBron and and a bunch of stiffs: PG: Mark Price SG: Austin Carr SF: LeBron James PF: Larry Nance C: Brad Daugherty Pacers, not as good as you'd think: PG: Mark Jackson SG: Reggie Miller SF: Roger Brown (ABA stud) PF: Jermaine O'Neal C: Mel Daniels Pistons: PG: Isaiah Thomas SG: Joe Dumars SF: Grant Hill PF: Dennis Rodman C: Bob Lanier Second team wouldn't be bad: PG: Dave Bing SG: Rip Hamilton SF: Kelly Tripucka PF: Ben Wallace C: Bill Laimbeer Heat, probably the best from that group of expansion teams: PG: Tim Hardaway SG: Dwyane Wade SF: LeBron James PF: Chris Bosh C: Alonzo Mourning Magic, not terrible for a late 80's expansion team: PG: Penny Hardaway SG: Tracy McGrady SF: Dennis Scott PF: Horace Grant C: Shaq Bobcats: LOL. Gerald Wallace and Emeka Okafor are their all time greats. It's going to be a little while before they get some worthy names. Hawks, not very recognizable given their best run came in the late 50s: PG: Lenny Wilkens SG: Cliff Hagan or Lou Hudson, some old guy or other SF: Dominique Wilkins PF: Bob Pettit C: Kevin Willis Wizards: PG: Gilbert Arenas or Rod Strickland SG: Earl Monroe SF: Bernard King or Bob Dandridge. Pretty lame history here. PF: Elvin Hayes C: Wes Unseld Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monte51Coleman Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Another way of looking at it: Shaq played just 15% of his career minutes in Miami. That's only a little bit more than Jordan played in DC, and both were in a similar state of decline at that point. Miami's title was all DWade in 2006-2007. Shaq only played 4 games that postseason, and only 40 games during the regular season. I don't think the Heat get to claim Shaq any more than the Wizards get to claim Jordan. Miami's title was in '05-'06 not '06-'07. Shaq only played 4 playoff games in the season following the championship because the team only played 4 games. The Heat were swept by the Bulls that year. You're right though about the Heat not getting to claim him and that's ok. We're more than happy with Alonzo. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 (edited) 1.) Celtics by a country mile. 2.) 76ers 3.) Pistons 4.) Bulls 5.) Knicks 6.) Heat 7.) Hawks 8.) Wizards/Bullets 9.) Bucks 10.) Magic 11.) Cavaliers 12.) Pacers 13.) Nets 14.) Raptors 15.) Bobcats The Pacers and Nets are awful for teams that have been around since the 60s. Top 9 all have championships. Bucks history seems better than it really is. The Oscar they got was at the end of his prime and they lost Kareem to the Lakers, who spent the majority of his career there. They only get half credit for those players. I give the Pistons the nod over Chicago on depth. But I can see putting Chicago over Detroit on top end quality. Another way of looking at it: Shaq played just 15% of his career minutes in Miami. That's only a little bit more than Jordan played in DC, and both were in a similar state of decline at that point. Miami's title was all DWade in 2006-2007. Shaq only played 4 games that postseason, and only 40 games during the regular season. I don't think the Heat get to claim Shaq any more than the Wizards get to claim Jordan. Miami's title was in '05-'06 not '06-'07. Shaq only played 4 playoff games in the season following the championship because the team only played 4 games. The Heat were swept by the Bulls that year. You're right though about the Heat not getting to claim him and that's ok. We're more than happy with Alonzo. Oh yeah, you're right. It was 05-06. My mistake. Zo is a HoFer IMO, a good consolation. Edited August 10, 2013 by stevemcqueen1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Actually, scratch that. Chicago should be #3 and Detroit #4. Having a respectable group on he second team doesn't trump Jordan. Quality is also reflected in the number of championships won. Chicago has 6 and Detroit has 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrypticVillain Posted August 10, 2013 Share Posted August 10, 2013 Steve, I can't believe you just compiled a starting five for every tab in the league. Well, not everybody. Poor Bobcats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 11, 2013 Share Posted August 11, 2013 Steve, I can't believe you just compiled a starting five for every tab in the league. Well, not everybody. Poor BobcatsIt wasn't hard after I got a system down. I looked up top ten best in franchise history lists for each team and used wikipedia to find all of the retired jerseys and HoFers for each franchise. Most teams had at least a couple of HoFers that were obvious picks. Then I found this thing on ESPN where they had polls of the all time best at each position for each team. The poll results were definitely biased against older generations of players in most cases, but it was a useful baseline. The Bobcats were the worst, but they're only just over 10 years old. Look at the Wizards roster, most of the guys came out of the 70's. Pearl, Elvin Hayes, and Wes Unseld. That'd be respectable for any team. But take the 40 years of franchise history after that group and try and make a list out of that and you end up with a group that's barely better than the Bobcats. 40 years of being an NBA wasteland. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sticksboi05 Posted August 12, 2013 Share Posted August 12, 2013 (edited) Another way of looking at it: Shaq played just 15% of his career minutes in Miami. That's only a little bit more than Jordan played in DC, and both were in a similar state of decline at that point. Miami's title was all DWade in 2006-2007. Shaq only played 4 games that postseason, and only 40 games during the regular season. I don't think the Heat get to claim Shaq any more than the Wizards get to claim Jordan. The title was in 2005-06, not 06-07. And Shaq played all 23 postseason games. Granted his regular season average of 20/9 was mediocre by his standards as was his 18/10 postseason average...again by his lofty standards. Edited August 12, 2013 by Sticksboi05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artmonkforHOF Posted August 12, 2013 Share Posted August 12, 2013 Well, looks like my Raptors are in tank mode, trying to win the come-home-Andrew-Wiggins-lottery, but at least they traded that useless 7 foot Italian. Can't believe they actually got picks from the Knicks for him. I'm hard on the guy, he really can't play D, but could be a great 6 man or first big off the bench & score with the right club, but he cannot be your #1 option on offense, he's not good enough to carry that, and his poor defense makes him a net loss at the position if he gets starter minutes. As for the tank job, I hope they have a plan B in place, those ping pong balls can be a tricky beast. With all the recent first round Canadian NBA talent, I think the better course is to build a solid team so 2-3 years from now, they can sign an Anthony Bennett, or Tristan Thompson, Corey Joseph would be stupid to leave the Spurs, but they have to assemble a team good enough to make those guys think of signing here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
artmonkforHOF Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 McQueen, your way underselling the Raptors, the only position they are weak for an all time team is SG. Nit much depth at Center, but not uncommon for expansion teams. PG Damon Stoudamire, Mark Jackson, Jalen Rose SG Doug Christie, Alvin Williams.Like i said, weak. SF Vince Carter, he makes list for nets, had better career here. Also T Mac, but only a few years. PF Bosh, or my fav, Charles Oakley C- Antonio Davis, Kevin Willis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted August 13, 2013 Share Posted August 13, 2013 McQueen, your way underselling the Raptors, the only position they are weak for an all time team is SG. Nit much depth at Center, but not uncommon for expansion teams. PG Damon Stoudamire, Mark Jackson, Jalen Rose SG Doug Christie, Alvin Williams.Like i said, weak. SF Vince Carter, he makes list for nets, had better career here. Also T Mac, but only a few years. PF Bosh, or my fav, Charles Oakley C- Antonio Davis, Kevin Willis Carter can qualify for the Raptors too, he played there long enough IMO. Though I think he's enjoyed more success in both New Jersey and Dallas. But TMac played so little in Toronto and then blew up in Orlando and Houston. Toronto has had All Stars, but no HoFers. And a common thread is having those All Stars leave once they're no longer under team control in order to go win with other teams. Their history isn't terrible for an expansion team. But stack it against pretty much any other franchise except the Grizzlies and the Bobcats and the quality is much lesser. I'd certainly take the all time line ups of the Heat, Magic, and Hornets over the Raptors, and I'd take the line up of the TWolves over them too. FWIW, I would like to see Andrew Wiggins go to Toronto too. It'll be tough to get rid of Rudy Gay, but Wiggins would make a nice pair with Terrence Ross and Valalnciunas IMO. The basketball media would hate it. But it'd be interesting. The only problem is your team is too good to finish top three. It's going to need serious lottery luck to jump up that far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RonArtest15 Posted October 16, 2013 Author Share Posted October 16, 2013 We need a bump here...Season is right around the corner. Who do you all like as far as (pre) Playoff seedings? East: 1. Miami 2. Indy 3. Chicago 4. Brooklyn 5. NYK 6. Washington 7. Detroit 8. Cleveland West: 1. OKC 2. Houston 3. LAC 4. Memphis 5. Denver 6. GS 7. SAS 8. Utah Will be fun to look back in a few months.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Going Commando Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 I think we can probably predict the playoff teams with like 80% accuracy. It'd be close to 100 if we could predict injuries. Feels like you make yourself a playoff team in the summer because its all about the quality of players on your roster. The best seasons happen for the teams with the most talented and balanced rosters. That doesn't necessarily happen in the NFL and MLB. There's a lot of magic that goes into a good season there. East: 1.) Chicago 2.) Miami 3.) Brooklyn 4.) New York 5.) Indiana 6.) Cleveland 7.) Washington 8.) Boston 9.) Milwaukee 10.) Detroit 11.) Atlanta 12.) Charlotte 13.) Toronto 14.) Orlando 15.) Philadelphia I think teams 6-11 are fairly even and interchangeable. Probably only be a few wins separating them. The top five in the East seem pretty well defined right now. Orlando and Philly are the only clearly bad teams in the East. The rest of the lottery teams should be competitive. --------------------- West: 1.) Oklahoma City 2.) San Antonio 3.) Houston 4.) L.A. Clippers 5.) Memphis 6.) L.A. Lakers 7.) Golden State 8.) Portland 9.) Dallas 10.) Minnesota 11.) New Orleans 12.) Denver 13.) Sacramento 14.) Utah 15.) Phoenix I could see Golden State falling out of the playoffs entirely if Curry gets hurt, which is never far away. I like Portland. I think they had a sneaky good offseason. I could see the Grizzlies taking a step back after firing Hollins, but I didn't penalize them for it. Wasn't really sure how it'd play out for them. I think Denver takes a major step back. They screwed the pooch this offseason. Kobe's recovery rate is incredible, and I can't count him out yet. I think he and Nash and Pau are the solid foundation for a late seed. A lot does ride on the health on Kobe's health. And Nash's and Kaman's health too. Be shocked if Sacramento, Phoenix, and Utah are competitive at all. I think New Orleans is competitive throughout the year, they've got an interesting team, but they're not quite done building yet. I think Dallas will stay in it for most of the year, and they've got a legit shot at a late seed. They're my first team in if anyone stumbles. I think Minnesota is right on the cusp and they're my second team in if anyone stumbles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted October 16, 2013 Share Posted October 16, 2013 We need a bump here...Season is right around the corner. Who do you all like as far as (pre) Playoff seedings? East: 1. Miami 2. Indy 3. Chicago 4. Brooklyn 5. NYK 6. Washington 7. Detroit 8. Cleveland West: 1. OKC 2. Houston 3. LAC 4. Memphis 5. Denver 6. GS 7. SAS 8. Utah Will be fun to look back in a few months.... I'll bite. The East looks possible, but your West is nutty (to me). Why would you have Denver ahead of San Antonio or Golden State? Denver just gutted the team, losing its coach, its GM and its best player (Igoudala), and Galinari will miss most of the season. Denver will always win a lot at home because of the high altitude, so their record is always a little inflated, but not that much. San Antonio was a single shot away from winning a ring a few months ago. Yes, they are going to all get old and retire one day, but it hasn't happened yet. Smartest, best coached team in the league. And why would Utah be on the list at all? They lost Jefferson and Millsap and Mo WIlliams, and are completely young and untested. They will struggle to win 30 games this year, but the future is very good. Minnesota and Dallas will both be much better than Utah this year. Going out on a limb myself, I might look for Portland to jump onto that list, somethere between 5 and 8. I'll go with 1) San Antonio 2) Houston 3) Clippers 4) OKC (Westbrook's new injury is devastating and they are not deep) 5) Memphis 6) GS 7) Portland 8) Minnesota (ok, maybe Denver) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now