Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

DB: Jim Cramer Stock Touting Scandal


JMS

Recommended Posts

http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-06-28/jim-cramer-lenny-dykstra-stock-scandal-reports-the-zeroes/?cid=hp:beastoriginalsR1

Jim Cramer Stock Touting Scandal

The stock guru's top pupil, baseball star Lenny Dykstra, was secretly paid to plug stocks on TheStreet.com and give access to Cramer, reveals Randall Lane in his new book, The Zeroes.

In an era of epically wrong financial predictions, boisterous Jim Cramer's declaration that "Bear Stearns is not in trouble!" a week before its March 2008 collapse, rated among the most moronic, or at least the most infamous.

But it turns out that Cramer made one call far worse: He decided to make a stock-picking star out of a mumbling former Major League Baseball All-Star named Lenny Dykstra, giving him a high-profile column and ultimately an expensive "premium" newsletter on Cramer's site TheStreet.com. How did Dykstra return the favor? As I reveal in my book, The Zeroes: My Misadventures in the Decade Wall Street Went Insane, Dykstra took money—$250,000 worth of secretly issued stock—in exchange for recommending that stock to TheStreet.com subscribers. He also promised access to Cramer in exchange for the stock, which he apparently hid under his brother-in-law's name.

It was Cramer's repeated endorsements—echoed by de facto validation from everyone from CNBC to me—that enabled Dykstra to pull off the scheme.

Jim Cramer single-handedly created the concept of Dykstra-as-financial genius. Known mostly for his willingness to crash his body into walls or his cars into trees (nickname: "Nails"), the former New York Met and Philadelphia Phillie became an investment columnist for TheStreet.com in 2005, after sending Cramer an unsolicited email. For the next four years, Dykstra made stock picks, focusing on "deep-in-the-money calls"—a way to buy leveraged options—for tens of thousands of followers on Cramer's website.

read more at the link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not shocked. He flat out admitted on TV in 2006 that he used to use a range of shady to probably illegal tricks to manipulate the market while he was a hedge fund manager.

There's a short article about it here, though they've taken down the video (I saw it a couple of years ago, though, and it's bad).

It's apparently not a bar to working in the financial media, though. The guy interviewing Cramer in that video, Aaron Task, cohosts a show called "Tech Ticker" with Henry Blodgett, who has been barred from the securties industry for fraud.

One more reason not to trust anything the financial media is currently hyperventilating about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cramer is hardly the first person to have been conned by Nails.

Here, this is a great read:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4084962

The real bad guy here is Dykstra.

Sorry, this is a poorly written article. What does

"Dykstra took money—$250,000 worth of secretly issued stock—in exchange for recommending that stock to TheStreet.com subscribers. He also promised access to Cramer in exchange for the stock, which he apparently hid under his brother-in-law's name." mean exactly?

He promised someone access to Cramer, or he promised Cramer access to something? That's the line that initially had me believing Cramer was guilty of more than being a twit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He promised someone access to Cramer, or he promised Cramer access to something? That's the line that initially had me believing Cramer was guilty of more than being a twit.

Cramer is a horrible judge of character at best, and just as involved at worst.

However in Dykstra, you have a clear pathelogical liar, and some one with literally hundreds of law suits pending against him, including from members of his own family.

There are no questions about right and wrong when it comes to Lenny Dykstra, while the questions about just how much Cramer was aware of remain. Neither outcome would surprise me, but to say Cramer was clearly aware of fraud is speculation at this point.

(which I know you weren't saying, but others certainly feel that way)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, this is a poorly written article. What does

"Dykstra took money—$250,000 worth of secretly issued stock—in exchange for recommending that stock to TheStreet.com subscribers. He also promised access to Cramer in exchange for the stock, which he apparently hid under his brother-in-law's name." mean exactly?

He promised someone access to Cramer, or he promised Cramer access to something? That's the line that initially had me believing Cramer was guilty of more than being a twit.

Lenny was give $250,000 in stock - which was put in his brother in law's name. Lenny then hyped the stock on Cramer's show. I don't think anyone has linked Cramer to this specifically. It seems to me that it's basically Cramer being blind to the fact that he was hyping an illiterate con man as a stock expert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How does a supposed Wall Street expert get conned by an illiterate ex-jock?

It's not like Cramer got conned by Bernie Madoff. It was ****ing Lenny.

The same way that he conned BOA, WaMu, several other smaller banks, and his former legal representation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The same way that he conned BOA, WaMu, several other smaller banks, and his former legal representation.

Doesn't that just give you all kinds of faith in capitalism and the free enterprise system?

Seriously, did no one hear this ****er talk?

I saw that piece on Real Sports when it first came out. I swear to God, my initial thought was, "Oh...a lot of people are about to get ****ing burned...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...