Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Could Fedex Field be one of our main problems?


BleedinBurgNGold

Recommended Posts

The things i dislike about Fedex field is that its MARYLAND.

And that a ticket costs so much i can't bring family(4) without planning for it now.

I used to go as a kid and be on the sidelines as my Dad watched the NBC equipment (way back machine i know) we would stay up all night, watch the game, and stay around till it was all cleaned up (24hours of the best job EVER!)

The fans of the skins are great: we got people into the pro-bowl that would never go on a subpar fan team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Skins wiin then Fed Ex could and would be one of the loudest stadiums. I can remember a game against the Bears a few years back. The crowd was responsible for like 2 or 3 delay of games in the 4th quarter. RFK was small, so the noise was really loud because the Skins won.

The Skins since moving haven't been a stable organization. Not having a plan, bad free agent moves, poor Cap mangagement, bad draft picks, wasted picks etc have plagued the Skins.

I always maintain that the Skins' evaluators need to be evaluated.

I do wish they would move them back in D.C. though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you don't think he'll build in DC or you don't think he'd downsize the stadium?
Sorry - the latter. I don't think he'd get anywhere near 70K. No way. No friggin' way. I could see him going back to 80K and hiking prices 20% across the board, but no way he'd get down to 70K and make the place loud like Qwest.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry - the latter. I don't think he'd get anywhere near 70K. No way. No friggin' way. I could see him going back to 80K and hiking prices 20% across the board, but no way he'd get down to 70K and make the place loud like Qwest.

Yeah it's a longshot for sure. You'd think he would notice things like the Steelers taking over FedEx/other teams with smaller stadiums having noise advantages, etc.

But he's prob more concerned with $$$ than building a dynasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fed Ex is definitly a problem for this team. For one it replaced the great NFL stadium. Two it was expensive as hell to build so tickets are too expensive for the casual fan to attend games. This creates a stadium full of fans who really don't care about the games and when prices get too expensive a stadium full of other teams fans like that Pittsburgh game. Three the owner uses it as a cash cow so beers and dogs run $30, outragious. Four it doesn't compete even when full to other smaller stadiums in terms of noise. Look at Seattles smaller and 100 times louder stadium...that is a home field advantage!

Fed Ex is part of the problem but its not going anywhere, its home

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it's a longshot for sure. You'd think he would notice things like the Steelers taking over FedEx/other teams with smaller stadiums having noise advantages, etc.

But he's prob more concerned with $$$ than building a dynasty.

I'd bet my first born he is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Fedex Field experience is among the worst in the NFL. Traffic is a nightmare. Views from more than a few seats aren't as good as watching the game on a 12'' black and white TV. The concession stands take half a quarter of play to get anything purchased and get back to your seat.

And, ding, ding............there are TOO MANY seats.

the Redskins are suffering from the same problems the Raiders did when they decided to play in the Colisseum in LA. A 99,000 seat stadium left more than enough spots for traveling teams' fans to take over large sections of the stands.

If Redskins Stadium was 65,000 seats all those Steeler and Eagle fans wouldn't be able to attend the game and make it feel like a home away from home.

Bulldog, I just can't buy the "too many seats" argument. I think there are arguably too many premium seats as compared to other stadiums; however, the real problem seems to be that too many of our supposed "diehard" fans who are STHs choose to only attend a couple of games and sell the rest on Stubhub.

Tens of thousands of Steeler fans.....many of which were sitting in the upper and lower bowls..... attending the game when our team was 6-2 was a joke. And don't give me the excuses about it being a night game, the day before the election, etc......sure didn't dissuade the Pitt fans from showing up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two it was expensive as hell to build so tickets are too expensive for the casual fan to attend games.

Casual fans of anything aren't likely to spend money on an entity of mild interest, that's why they're labeled as casual. We have plenty of hard core fans who don't spend the money on season tix for the simple reason that the gameday experience is no longer worth it.

JKC stadium was a relative bargain to build compared to what other NFL owners and taxpayers have spent in decade since the ribbon cutting on the stadium in Landover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Home field advantage as a concept in the NFL is dead.
Not really.

Sagarin tracks this and assigns points for home field advantage based on what happened in recent weeks of that season. He shows this for home field advantage:

'99 3.13

'00 2.82

'01 1.94

'02 2.50

'03 3.11

'04 2.41

'05 3.54

'06 1.44

'07 2.73

'08 2.41

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nfl08.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really.

Sagarin tracks this and assigns points for home field advantage based on what happened in recent weeks of that season. He shows this for home field advantage:

'99 3.13

'00 2.82

'01 1.94

'02 2.50

'03 3.11

'04 2.41

'05 3.54

'06 1.44

'07 2.73

'08 2.41

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/nfl08.htm

In 2007, home underdogs were 44-45-1 against the spread in 2007, and 32-45-2 against the spread in 2008.

Just something to ponder.

(I think in terms of gambling a lot and last week was a gambler's armageddon).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

call it the curse of fedex.

we angered the redskins gods when snyder sold the naming rights of the stadium to fedex. it was jack kent cooke stadium for gods sake.

i love how the stadium is decorated in fedex colors and not redskin colors :doh:

We should have kept the name as God intended it:

"My Wife is a Coke Whore Stadium."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Home field advantage as a concept in the NFL is dead.

Yup. It died with NFL dynasties (I'll exclude the Pats cause who knows how much cheating went on.) Too much parity in the league, too much commercialism, too high ticket prices. You leave out the fans who will go bonkers for the ones who will just sit there and do nothing, but can afford the $100+ a seat.

Home teams are 3-5 in the playoffs this year; last year they were 5-5. Teams who are playing the best at that time usually win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We won in Philly and Dallas for heaven's sake...

No, the Redskins problem is not the stadium, its not the wind, its not the fortune on that particular day, its not whether your dog scratched himself with his left leg instead of his right leg, its their play on the field.

Why must we look for excuses everywhere else?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...