skinsfan93 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Forgive me, I know there are a million threads on JC and the offense being ineffective. I just want to get your opinion on what I think is the true problem about Campbell and what he needs to do to ultimately become a quarterback, who not just manages an offense, but can carry it. Towards the end of the first half, the Skins get the ball back down 10-7 with about 21 seconds on our 32 yard line. Obviously Zorn isn't willing to just kneel on the ball hoping for a couple of plays that may give us a potential field goal. So, first play JC throws a safe pass to Cooley across the middle for 13 yards and gets us to the 45 yard line (I'm fine with this play as it prevents a costly turnover). At this point, like many of us here know, if we can get about 20 yards, we may be able to try a long field goal (no guarantee of course). Next play JC throws another short pass to Ladell that goes incomplete. Fine, we can take one more shot since there is 11 seconds left. HERE'S THE PLAY that frustrates me about JC. On the next play, Campbell takes a 3 step drop and looks like he is going to throw it down the middle for a decent gain. Instead, he pulls it back, feels the pressure, scrambles and tries a dump off to Ladell that goes incomplete. WHY NOT FRICKIN' THROW IT? Sure, maybe the ball gets picked but there is no time on the clock for Seattle to get into field goal position. Maybe it could get returned for a td. Highly doubtful. And keep in mind, Seattle's defense is terrible. I don't know if it's a lack of confidence in himself, his receivers, or something else. Campbell just doesn't take many chances and his game management has a lot to desire. I'm sure like many of you, I get frustrated with the constant check downs by JC and dumping it off. But in this situation, he should have thrown it. I'm not looking for him to be Favre-like but I just have a hard time understanding why he doesn't take more chances. What do you guys think? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BALLz Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I think for every one person who agrees with you there will be one who would have said throwing the ball deep would have been stupid. So basically he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky21 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 You know the head coach calls the plays that are run, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyConway Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I was also a little irked by that play. Then again what if it was picked and the return put them in FG range? As much as I want JC to sling the rock a bit more I would like him to make calculated risks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IbleedBnG83 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 You know the head coach calls the plays that are run, right? I'm pretty sure the play he was refering to was a pass play that JC held onto in order to play it safe. He is playing smart which is what Zorn wants. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan93 Posted November 24, 2008 Author Share Posted November 24, 2008 You know the head coach calls the plays that are run, right? I'm not understanding this? Don't you think the play called was for JC to throw the ball and not dump it off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
[[ghost]] Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I think for every one person who agrees with you there will be one who would have said throwing the ball deep would have been stupid. So basically he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't. That's pretty much what it is. If he had thrown a pick, he would have "thrown away a perfectly good opportunity to score points." If a receiver drops it, he would have been off with his accuracy. I honestly read a post where someone tried to blame Moss' dropped Deep Ball on Campbell for not "leading him." Jason Campbell can do no right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweet Sassy Molassy Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 You know the head coach calls the plays that are run, right? Well it is on the QB to make good reads too. So I'm not sure how much validity your query holds. I love JC to death, but I feel at times he's been too careful with the ball. I was happy that we went deep a few times this past game, and Campbell seemed to be happy that they are doing that. So it's possible Zorn was asking him to stay safe. In that series in question I will say it looked like JC wasn't trying to throw the ball to Betts, he was just trying to stop the clock and not lose yards. He threw it right at Betts feet, I really think he did that on purpose. On the next play, I don't know, it could have been another one of those types of things where he was just trying to see the next play and not lose yards, considering anything we did would have needed to get us out of bounds to stop the clock. So going down the middle would have been dumb. Who knows, we'll see how we start working the deep ball, and let JC let loose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I'm not understanding this? Don't you think the play called was for JC to throw the ball and not dump it off? Ladell wasn't his first option, he was a checkdown. So yes, Zorn was looking for a deeper pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sameoldstory08 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I have to agree about that series. When he dropped back he fully intended to go deep. With that little time left I say chunk it out there and give a receiver a chance to make a play. It's a combination of things. Coaching, strategy, system, confidence. Hopefully it will come together over the close of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan93 Posted November 24, 2008 Author Share Posted November 24, 2008 ];5859388']That's pretty much what it is. If he had thrown a pick' date=' he would have "thrown away a perfectly good opportunity to score points." If a receiver drops it, he would have been off with his accuracy.I honestly read a post where someone tried to blame Moss' dropped Deep Ball on Campbell for not "leading him." Jason Campbell can do no right.[/quote'] It wasn't a perfectly good opportunity to score. We weren't in field goal range and we only had 11 seconds left in the half. By not throwing it, it gave us no chance to get any score. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JdoubleU Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I'm pretty sure JC has standing orders since day 1 to NOT throw into coverage. A play like that (INT) becomes a punt return...with 5 O-lineman trying to track down a fast DB. remember the Rams game, how a simple breakdown in execution resulted into a TD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
purbeast Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Yea I mean from TV we could clearly tell what the coverage was down field and we know better than an NFL QB what should have been done in that situation. Screw being 7-4, we should be 10-1 and be tied for first in the NFL! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkekoa Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Not throwing the ball in fear of a negative play is not playing it smart. Playing it smart is understanding the situation and making a play. In this case, playing it smart is understanding that the only way this play hurts us is if is returned for a TD. There is a much better chance of something good happening for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketCitySkins Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 At 11 seconds JC pulls the ball back down and then hits the Seattle lineman in the hip. At the end of that play he knew he would have another shot and I'm thinking he was hoping to see something better in the way of odds of the ball being caught. At 3 seconds he does go deep to Thrash and Thrash almost makes a what would have been a great catch at the 1 yd line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I don't know if it's a lack of confidence in himself, his receivers, or something else. Campbell just doesn't take many chances and his game management has a lot to desire. I'm sure like many of you, I get frustrated with the constant check downs by JC and dumping it off. But in this situation, he should have thrown it. I'm not looking for him to be Favre-like but I just have a hard time understanding why he doesn't take more chances. It is obvious that Jason Campbell doesn't have the balls to be an NFL quarterback. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sameoldstory08 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Yea I mean from TV we could clearly tell what the coverage was down field and we know better than an NFL QB what should have been done in that situation.Screw being 7-4, we should be 10-1 and be tied for first in the NFL! I just want him to show some stones every now and again and take a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passizle Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 It also gave us a chance to go out with something positive... ball control. Had he just "chunked it"... what if it was picked? Hell... Seattle may have been able to run one back for a pick 6. I dont know... nobody does. Just be happy we have a starting QB with 3 picks in 12 games. Mere is my take. He was looking for an all or nothing. There was no time on the clock... and I am betting his hot read was covered enough to nopt make that play. Maybe it was in the middle of the field. JC could have hit his open man and that guy may have been tackled right away... Big gain... no time.. no points anyway. end result was the same. Dont worry guys... the TD's will come. Especially if the protection holds up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sameoldstory08 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 it also gave us a chance to go out with something positive... Ball control. Had he just "chunked it"... What if it was picked? Hell... Seattle may have been able to run one back for a pick 6. I dont know... Nobody does. Just be happy we have a starting qb with 3 picks in 12 games.Mere is my take. He was looking for an all or nothing. There was no time on the clock... And i am betting his hot read was covered enough to nopt make that play. Maybe it was in the middle of the field. Jc could have hit his open man and that guy may have been tackled right away... Big gain... No time.. No points anyway. End result was the same. Dont worry guys... The td's will come. Especially if the protection holds up. zero risk = zero reward Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 It also gave us a chance to go out with something positive... ball control. Had he just "chunked it"... what if it was picked? Hell... Seattle may have been able to run one back for a pick 6. I dont know... nobody does. Just be happy we have a starting QB with 3 picks in 12 games.Mere is my take. He was looking for an all or nothing. There was no time on the clock... and I am betting his hot read was covered enough to nopt make that play. Maybe it was in the middle of the field. JC could have hit his open man and that guy may have been tackled right away... Big gain... no time.. no points anyway. end result was the same. Dont worry guys... the TD's will come. Especially if the protection holds up. We still had a timeout left you *****! :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RocketCitySkins Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 It is obvious that Jason Campbell doesn't have the balls to be an NFL quarterback. That's ridiculous. He's been thrown around like a rag doll the last several games. Lamar Woodley was fined $10,000 for picking JC up and slamming to the ground like it was a WWF wrestling match. He's stayed in the pocket and taken every hit and probably could have avoided several if he was a gunslinger and not careful with his throws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elkabong82 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I just want him to show some stones every now and again and take a chance. deep bomb to Moss, deep fade to Kelly, another fade to Kelly in the redzone, hail mary at the end of the half Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 That's ridiculous. He's been thrown around like a rag doll the last several games. Lamar Woodley was fined $10,000 for picking JC up and slamming to the ground like it was a WWF wrestling match. He's stayed in the pocket and taken every hit and probably could have avoided several if he was a gunslinger and not careful with his throws. And he still lacks the balls to throw the ball down the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passizle Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 We still had a timeout left you *****! :doh: Dont call me a **** you ****. You lack the balls to act rationally I can see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passizle Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 zero risk = zero reward Really? We did not risk much yesterday and walked away with another win. Thats 7-4 on the season. Not too shabby for playing it safe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.