NewCliche21 Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 No offense to Landry, but it wasn't "thrown his way," as much as thrown at him. He dove for it. So no. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter_R Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 He dove for it.So no. It was much closer to him than the receiver. He didn't jump any routes. It was a good diving int, but that's it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da#1skinsfan Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 No offense to Landry, but it wasn't "thrown his way," as much as thrown at him. He had to dive for it, are you kidding? It was a great catch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 It was much closer to him than the receiver. He didn't jump any routes. It was a good diving int, but that's it. . . . I'm gonna let you think about what you just wrote and wait for the edit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter_R Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 . . . I'm gonna let you think about what you just wrote and wait for the edit. There won't be one. He wasn't "tested." It was a horrid throw by the qb. This site should almost be called Extremely Sensitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bzapf Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 It was much closer to him than the receiver. He didn't jump any routes. It was a good diving int, but that's it. You will do anything to be negative won't you? That was an awsome int and you are full of **** Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfitzo53 Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 It was a nice catch, but not amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter_R Posted November 23, 2008 Share Posted November 23, 2008 You will do anything to be negative won't you? That was an awsome int and you are full of **** Nah, I just don't get caught up and make something bigger than it is. It was a good play, but it was almost given to him. It was a nice catch, but not amazing. I completely agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mi6 Posted November 23, 2008 Author Share Posted November 23, 2008 Laron is definitely a playmaker but he has to show me more before I put him in the class with the top in the league. He is a typical crushing hit safety but he doesn't have the cover skills of a Ed Reed or the one of the best safety's I ever saw in John Lynch. Laron will be a big time player in the NFL eventually. He is certainly a better position/playmaker than Carlos Rogers ... We traded up to get him, and Carlos is yet to get over the "50/50" tag. He is NFL's Mr. Butterfingers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NewCliche21 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 It was a nice catch, but not amazing. Yeah, he wasn't saving a child from a fire while making it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hunter_R Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 He is certainly a better position/playmaker than Carlos Rogers ... We traded up to get him, and Carlos is yet to get over the "50/50" tag. He is NFL's Mr. Butterfingers. Campbell was the one they traded up for. Rogers was the Skins' 1st round pick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Glad to have you back Dirty 30!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deejaydana Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Ed Reed is probably the best safety every to play football. Ed Reed is good, but he's "maybe" top 10 on the all time safety list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lar0n Landry Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Landry played a great game today. Glad to see him finally get a pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
da#1skinsfan Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 There won't be one. He wasn't "tested." It was a horrid throw by the qb. This site should almost be called Extremely Sensitive. Or "Extra Sour" Seriously, pull your head out of your rear and enjoy the win. It was an above average move to get that pick - while it wasnt circus, it was far from a gimme. Deal with it. GO SKINS, way to go LaRon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_89 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Good game Dirty 30:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnhay Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 And, those who love our current punter, and reject from Seattle, his first punt was 38 yards with a nine yards return. The net punt was 29 yards... awesome! :mad: I'm just glad he got that punt away. The blocking was terrible on that punt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavarleap56 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 It was a nice catch but nothing special, troy polamaleaus int last week that's was special. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSO Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 There won't be one. He wasn't "tested." It was a horrid throw by the qb. This site should almost be called Extremely Sensitive. Saying he wasn't "tested" is quite the complement. I'm glad you agree with all of us here that Landry is a playmaker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lavarleap56 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 Saying he wasn't "tested" is quite the complement. I'm glad you agree with all of us here that Landry is a playmaker. He really isn't a playmaker though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JCav06 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I wouldn't call landry a playmaker.....yet. that was a great int by him though. when i think playmaker, i think about players like ed reed and polumalo (sp.). landry's getting there though. it's a shame we can't play against hasselbeck every game (3 ints in two games against seattle). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GOSKINS350 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I thought Shawn Springs's INT had a higher degree of difficulty. His body was going one way, but he managed to turn his torso and catch a ball thrown behind him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I thought Shawn Springs's INT had a higher degree of difficulty. His body was going one way, but he managed to turn his torso and catch a ball thrown behind him. It was indeed a great play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRAVEONAWARPATH Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 He is a typical crushing hit safety but he doesn't have the cover skills of a Ed Reed or the one of the best safety's I ever saw in John Lynch. Landry has every bit the coverage skills as Ed Reed. In fact, Landry might be better in coverage. He's just not the ballhawk that Reed is (yet). And as for John Lynch having great coverage skills....I don't know what John Lynch you've seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeadExField Posted November 24, 2008 Share Posted November 24, 2008 I thought Shawn Springs's INT had a higher degree of difficulty. His body was going one way, but he managed to turn his torso and catch a ball thrown behind him. A higher degree of difficulty? What is this calculous? Anytime I see someoe dive for a ball, its usually a big time catch. And since the ball wasn't thrown to LaRon, he had to track it down away from him and go get it himself = he made the play. Being a playmaker is doing that on a consistent basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.