Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

MSNBC: These 10 should retire (two Redskins)


cphil006

Recommended Posts

That article is ridiculous.

Why should Todd Collins retire? As stated, he hasn't started a game since 1997. What's the league minimum? At least 200K? If someone paid me that much money to stand around and fondle a clipboard, I'd milk it for as long as I possibly could...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charles Woodson on that list is correct. What a bitter, bitter disappointment of a man and a human being. He stopped playing hard because the Raiders didn't want to give him that 7 year $70 million (I'm exaggerating) salary he felt he deserved. Now, he can't even remember how to play hard. What a waste of money and roster space. For once, the Raiders were right. This guy is the guy who will only play for money. $52 million in 7 years isn't enough for him to play hard apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Brunnell would be a great back up in this league right now. When he is rested, has is legs, he looks ok. He doesn't throw many picks and can hold things down. Perfect for a back up. As a starting QB, he's done.

Brunell would be a decent back-up, too bad we paid so much for him. We might be forced to keep him even as a back-up roll next year because of the cap hit that would incur should we cut him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charles Woodson on that list is correct. What a bitter, bitter disappointment of a man and a human being. He stopped playing hard because the Raiders didn't want to give him that 7 year $70 million (I'm exaggerating) salary he felt he deserved. Now, he can't even remember how to play hard. What a waste of money and roster space. For once, the Raiders were right. This guy is the guy who will only play for money. $52 million in 7 years isn't enough for him to play hard apparently.

Dude, your sig is hillarious! :laugh: :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those two Redskins make no sense on that list, Rumph is only in his 5th year, and I'm sure most non-skins or 49er fans dont even know who Mike Rumph is, I would hope for Kenny Wright to retire before him. There are alot of QBs around that get paid to hold a clipboard, I dont know why they singled out Collins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those two Redskins make no sense on that list, Rumph is only in his 5th year, and I'm sure most non-skins or 49er fans dont even know who Mike Rumph is, I would hope for Kenny Wright to retire before him. There are alot of QBs around that get paid to hold a clipboard, I dont know why they singled out Collins.

Because of how unable Brunell is to run a pro offense, I assume - as well as his pitiful performance when he has played in the offense during preseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

His "logic" is flawed at best

Collins should retire because as a backup he hasn't played much??????

Rumph should because he hasn't reached his first round potential????

and why pick 2 backup players that no one really knows?????? sounds like someone has a tiny agenda :laugh:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Charles Woodson on that list is correct. What a bitter, bitter disappointment of a man and a human being. He stopped playing hard because the Raiders didn't want to give him that 7 year $70 million (I'm exaggerating) salary he felt he deserved. Now, he can't even remember how to play hard. What a waste of money and roster space. For once, the Raiders were right. This guy is the guy who will only play for money. $52 million in 7 years isn't enough for him to play hard apparently.

Wow, sounds like he should be a "core" Redskin. He's ideal for this team by the sounds of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...