88Comrade2000 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Who's your choice to be the 2008 democratic nominee? Damn- I double posted Wesley Clark. I was going to put John Edwards in there. So if you want Former VP nominee John Edwards- click someone else! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Whoa I'm, going to vote for Clark twice...he is that awesome! No...just kidding. I'm going Evan Byah...even if his recent votes against Bush's surpreme court nominees have me a bit worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. S Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Mark Warner, seems like a good candidate overall, especially with how he helped VA out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hokie4redskins Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Here's to Hillary and another republican landslide. But, I don't think the dems would be THAT stupid to nominate her. Though, they never cease to amaze so you never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbear Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Barak Obama. He just might be one of the best natural speakers I have heard. I'd have to hear more on his positions, but what I have heard has been good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midnight Judges Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Mark Warner baby. Barack would make a good VP but Warner needs to pick a war hawk like Carl Levin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Destino Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Wesley Clark or Mark Warner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Air Force Cane Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 don't even bother- Hillary has it in the bag. you think Mark Warner (who about 10 people in this country have ever heard of)will beat Queen Hillary??!!! you are crazy if you do.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cjcdaman Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Here's to Hillary and another republican landslide. But, I don't think the dems would be THAT stupid to nominate her. Though, they never cease to amaze so you never know. I think she will be the Dem. candidate and that woman will get trounced in the central "red" states. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chopper Dave Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Barak Obama.He just might be one of the best natural speakers I have heard. I'd have to hear more on his positions, but what I have heard has been good. Too young. Maybe in 2012 if the Dems lose, or 2016 if they win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhodatSkinsFan? Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I agree.... too early for Obama..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Predicto Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 don't even bother- Hillary has it in the bag.you think Mark Warner (who about 10 people in this country have ever heard of)will beat Queen Hillary??!!! you are crazy if you do.. I am not at all sure that this is true. Although I think someone like Evan Bayh has a better chance than Warner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chopper Dave Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 The only people you'll hear saying Hillary is in the bag are people who REALLY want the Dems to lose, and will fool themselves into believing the Dems are going to make it easy for them. Hillary is UNELECTABLE. Too many Dems don't like her enough to vote for her over a moderate Republican, and the vast majority of Republicans HATE her. The Democrats are not going to put up someone who won't win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 12th Commandment Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Seems like the rest of ya are being homers so I will too. Richardson has done a phenomenal job as our gov. He has the stroke to get things done in dc and he is a moderate. He's also a mean sumbithc so watch out GOPers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexRS Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Al Gore, baby!! Looks like he grew personality and balls :laugh: He was the first one to call out on the wiretapping issue and he did it in a non-partisan way... (you would disagree if you think that "call out on the wiretapping issue" implies partisanship by definition). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
visionary Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 The only people you'll hear saying Hillary is in the bag are people who REALLY want the Dems to lose, and will fool themselves into believing the Dems are going to make it easy for them. Hillary is UNELECTABLE. Too many Dems don't like her enough to vote for her over a moderate Republican, and the vast majority of Republicans HATE her. The Democrats are not going to put up someone who won't win. They put up Kerry.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatty P For The Pulitzer Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Seems like the rest of ya are being homers so I will too. Richardson has done a phenomenal job as our gov. He has the stroke to get things done in dc and he is a moderate. He's also a mean sumbithc so watch out GOPers! I did one of those silly questionnaires to choose who you wanted to be Kerry's running mate in '04 (the ones where you answer 20 questions, and they rank potential VP candidates based on your responses), and Richardson was the closest match based on my answers. I don't know a thing about the guy, so I'd be interested to see what his platform would be if he ran. Some of the other people on there I would never vote for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chopper Dave Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 They put up Kerry.... Yeah, and Kerry almost won. For the record, I voted for Mark Warner, not because I even necessarily agree with him the most (from what I hear he might be a bit conservative for my tastes), but because he's certainly the most electable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The 12th Commandment Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 I did one of those silly questionnaires to choose who you wanted to be Kerry's running mate in '04 (the ones where you answer 20 questions, and they rank potential VP candidates based on your responses), and Richardson was the closest match based on my answers. I don't know a thing about the guy, so I'd be interested to see what his platform would be if he ran. Some of the other people on there I would never vote for. To start with he was our UN ambassador, and secretary of energy under clinton. So you know where he is on the spectrum - just left of the middle, where I want my candidate to be. He has lowered our taxes, even sent everyone a rebate, due to increased oil and gas revenue. Hey, at least he's sharing it. He is very pro-education. His stand on the border (and it REALLY matters to those of us who live on it) is to increase legal immigration and beef up border security. Just what the Dr. ordered. Here's a link that breaks it down pretty well. http://www.westerndemocrat.com/2006/01/the_case_for_bi.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MissU28 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Here's to Hillary and another republican landslide. But, I don't think the dems would be THAT stupid to nominate her. Though, they never cease to amaze so you never know. i like this guy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Air Force Cane Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Latest Rasmussen poll out today: Queen Hillary 27% positive approval/definitely vote for 47% negative approval/definitely will not vote for :notworthy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kilmer17 Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Ive been saying this for a while, but it applies here. I will vote for Mark Warner over any GOPer save Jeb and MAYBE McCain. Assuming Warner doesnt go too far to the left with his VP choice. Warner/Bayh get's my vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frommd Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 :rotflmao: Al Gore, baby!! Looks like he grew personality and balls :laugh: He was the first one to call out on the wiretapping issue and he did it in a non-partisan way... (you would disagree if you think that "call out on the wiretapping issue" implies partisanship by definition). :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: It almost sounds like you're serious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chopper Dave Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 Latest Rasmussen poll out today:Queen Hillary 27% positive approval/definitely vote for 47% negative approval/definitely will not vote for :notworthy That's not really good for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Air Force Cane Posted February 9, 2006 Share Posted February 9, 2006 why isn't hillary tanking in the polls good for the GOP? is your political advice that it would be much better if she had 62% approval and 57% "definitely vote for"?!! :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.