CowboySlayer Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 brunell did not get us to the playoffs, the defense and the running game did. he even did or tried to make us lose a couple with his untimely stupid turnovers. against the seahwks, broncos, chiefs, cards and rams. for a veteran he sure makes some horrible mistakes. i dont want him to lead this team next year unless its from the backup role. if by saying backup, you mean not in any way tied to the team, than i must agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CowboySlayer Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 wow you really are an idiot man.... sorry just curious how you and everyone else can rant about people who should be getting banned for attacking posters and not posts, but you are obviously doing the same. idiot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 just curious how you and everyone else can rant about people who should be getting banned for attacking posters and not posts, but you are obviously doing the same. idiot. aw, never mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinzWin88 Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 if by saying backup, you mean not in any way tied to the team, than i must agree You just don't GET it, do you? If you're so f-ing unbiased, why would you say this? There's no reason we can't have him on the team as a back-up, giving bits of wisdom to Campbell, even if he isn't a viable starter.Go over to the Cowpies boards, Mr. "CowboySlayer". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOF44 Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 'Loser'?'****'? WTF's wrong with YOU.....thats MY question? Theres no doubt there was more Brunell could do for us this year. Theres no doubt he's seen his best days, and they're in the rear view mirror. He's showing his age, and he did fade down the stretch. That, in case you can't recognize it, is a fair assessment. What you threw out there is utter BS. Brunell did a few other things you failed to mention. He helped us sweep...thats S-W-E-E-P ....Dallas and Philadelphia this year. Splitting with them would've given most of us goosebumps before the season. He got us to the playoffs, and lackluster performance or not, got us to the 2nd round (yeah, you can argue that it was inspite of his subpar yardage that we got there....you could also argue we had the game well in hand and that offensive risk-taking could well have cost us the win). Get a grip. If you want Campbell to start, tell us why. He's an apparently talented rookie who's not done ONE damn thing in the NFL. Thats not to say he won't. I trust Gibbs knows talent when he sees it. In Brunell, and in Campbell. But that doesn't mitigate the fact that Campbell might well prove to be much much worse than Brunell right now. I hope he lights it up if he is 'the guy' this coming year. But your post, pretending Mark Brunell had damn near NOTHING to do with our 2005 resurgence, one I've been waiting for for a decade, well.... It makes me sick. Wow, Tarhog fired up I don't think I've seen you this ticked off. Your usually so calm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peregrine Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 While the man makes a good point about Brunells production, he then completely drops the ball when he calls him a loser and says he did a horrible job. Brunell did not do a horrible job, brunell did a quite decent job. Mainly, he didnt turn the ball over a lot. If we want to go to the next level are we going to need someone who plays better? Yes, and personaly I think Ramsey is the best man next season. But lets at least be honest about the job Brunell did. Brunell cant throw the ball downfield worth a darn(with the exception of ill say 4-5 balls all year), but he did the job he was required to do, and did a quite decent job of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MustangSteve Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 One thing he didnt do was throw interceptions and put us out of a game, something that Campbell will do and many times im sure. If you think people can just come off of the bench and win superbowls, then maybe its you who needs to go. For the record, "under Brunell" the Redskins were the hottest team in the NFC the second half of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fansince62 Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 BS (interesting truncation...no?!) is missing the point made by others and has the "white noise" turned up full throttle: Gibbs has a transition strategy. MB played a role and, by all appearances, played it well. Getting to the SB this season or last season was NOT the immediate term goal (though no one in the Skins org will admit to that). The primary goal was transitioning the team from a losing franchise to one with character. MB is and has been a transition player all along - the surprise, if there is one, is that he will be serving as the role model for JC rather than PR. as for BS's slightly slanted argument - you can't argue with the ultimate arbiter: the won/lost record. no matter how the Ws and Ls are chalked up, the QB is either accorded recognition for the Good as well as the Bad....or the standard is biased right from the git go. While the obvious is in front of us - an aging QB who has some limitations - it is impudent and imprudent to not see the larger role MB played and to not understand how he responded to the assignment Gibbs very likely tabbed him with. fixations can be nasty things! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigRay Posted January 30, 2006 Share Posted January 30, 2006 Injuries played an huge part of the decline of Brunell in the last half of the season and playoffs also you look at some of those games there really was no need to throw the ball a whole lot. The second Dallas game our defense gave us a short field most of the game and the running game was working well. The same with the games against the Cards and Rams why throw the ball for a lot of yyards when the running game was working so well and working on a short field.? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JPM285181 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 While the man makes a good point about Brunells production, he then completely drops the ball when he calls him a loser and says he did a horrible job.Brunell did not do a horrible job, brunell did a quite decent job. Mainly, he didnt turn the ball over a lot. If we want to go to the next level are we going to need someone who plays better? Yes, and personaly I think Ramsey is the best man next season. But lets at least be honest about the job Brunell did. Brunell cant throw the ball downfield worth a darn(with the exception of ill say 4-5 balls all year), but he did the job he was required to do, and did a quite decent job of it. Nice post you called it right. I agree about next year as well I hope we keep Ramsey Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNeverDie Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Brunell may not have the sexy #'s but he certainly makes the right veteren choices. He has a special connection with Moss, and he definately knows when to throw the ball away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moondog Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 and he definately knows when to throw the ball away. ha not gonna disagree on that one :laugh: :doh: o well i guess its better than a forced throw? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HittinSkinz Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Come onIn 18 games he threw for 300 yards TWICE in 18 games he threw for less than 200 yards 10 TEN TIMES and got worse as the season went along...... game 10 - 155 yards vs. mighty Oakland game 11 - 194 yards vs. San Diego game 12 - 156 yards vs the defensive powerhouse Rams game 13 - 122 yards and 3 picks vs. ARIZONA game 14 - 163 yards vs. Dallas game 15 - 112 yards vs. NY Giants game 16 - 141 yards vs. crippled Philadelphia game 17 - 41 yards vs. Tampa Bay game 18 - 242 prevent defense yards vs. Seattle No point in getting more receivers with this loser at the helm. The 41 yard effort itself is reason to cut this ****, but he consistently plays poorly, game after game....and needs to go You're taking $ 6,000 for 2 seats and expect me to sit through Mark ****ing Brunell again PLAY CAMPBELL he couldn't possibly do worse you lack basic football IQ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceman330 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 You are certainly a jerk. The man got injured in the 2nd quarter of the Giants game and that -- combined with all the other injuries he gotten as a result of faulty blocking schemes -- led to his slow decline at the end of the year. You must be a moron to think that he is a bad quarterback. TOTALLY UNNECESSARY and VERY RUDE! :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iceman330 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 You could debate his points without attacking him. He's entitled to his opinion. YEP! :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest GibbSkins11 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Come onIn 18 games he threw for 300 yards TWICE in 18 games he threw for less than 200 yards 10 TEN TIMES and got worse as the season went along...... game 10 - 155 yards vs. mighty Oakland game 11 - 194 yards vs. San Diego game 12 - 156 yards vs the defensive powerhouse Rams game 13 - 122 yards and 3 picks vs. ARIZONA game 14 - 163 yards vs. Dallas game 15 - 112 yards vs. NY Giants game 16 - 141 yards vs. crippled Philadelphia game 17 - 41 yards vs. Tampa Bay game 18 - 242 prevent defense yards vs. Seattle No point in getting more receivers with this loser at the helm. The 41 yard effort itself is reason to cut this ****, but he consistently plays poorly, game after game....and needs to go You're taking $ 6,000 for 2 seats and expect me to sit through Mark ****ing Brunell again PLAY CAMPBELL he couldn't possibly do worse lol , i guess u dont want a super bowl title, i bet u thought the same thing about joey t when gibbs had him , if bru had a 2nd wr we would be 4 days away from spanking the steelers ps what was his td/int ratio u know the thing that matters to gibbs and how many tds he throw vs dallas? how many ints?llllloooollllll:laugh: ur a cowboy fan i can smell u from ur computer in valley ranch:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsknz4life Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Come onIn 18 games he threw for 300 yards TWICE in 18 games he threw for less than 200 yards 10 TEN TIMES and got worse as the season went along...... game 10 - 155 yards vs. mighty Oakland game 11 - 194 yards vs. San Diego game 12 - 156 yards vs the defensive powerhouse Rams game 13 - 122 yards and 3 picks vs. ARIZONA game 14 - 163 yards vs. Dallas game 15 - 112 yards vs. NY Giants game 16 - 141 yards vs. crippled Philadelphia game 17 - 41 yards vs. Tampa Bay game 18 - 242 prevent defense yards vs. Seattle No point in getting more receivers with this loser at the helm. The 41 yard effort itself is reason to cut this ****, but he consistently plays poorly, game after game....and needs to go You're taking $ 6,000 for 2 seats and expect me to sit through Mark ****ing Brunell again PLAY CAMPBELL he couldn't possibly do worse Man I agree with everything you just posted. Hopefully Campbell will just beat him out in training camp and then we'll never have to see him on the field again! He's only good for 5-7 strong games in a season, then his body just starts to break down! The coaching staff didn't see this I guess???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redsknz4life Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 Although i typically disagree with almost everything (brunellsuperbowl) you say simply because you seem to just come on here to bash people, your statement about the other three qb's with no pro-bowlers and all that rings very true. They are better qb's no doubt but i remember a thread late last year stating how brunell locks on to one receiver, if he's not open he throws it away. Many of the moderators and long-time members here either agreed or expressed their worry about that topic and how they believed it was probably true. No doubt i was pleased with brunell and thought he was a big part of our success but many times i also was disappointed in the old veteran calm, patient approach as opposed to a gunslinging young qb who can move the offense. My point is, I disagree with anyone that says we have one receiver. First off, because in my oppinion cooley might as well be a receiver and also deserves the pro-bowl as a tight end. David Patten was one of BRADY'S receivers and his favorite target therefore even if you disregard Cooley as a "receiver" you still cannot say we only have one receiver. I believe that thread earlier was true, that brunell just never looked at anybody but cooley and moss and that is why whoever was in the number 2 slot never got any numbers. Already brunell supporters on here have expressed in this thread that brunell had a great year but it is time to start moving on to the future and while that inlcudes mark, it does not mean he is "the guy." So quit bashing brunell, hell half of us probably agree on most of your points but just wont admit it because yer just trashing the guy and always have. LOL Your comments are soooo true! (Some people just don't want to admit that Brunnell needs to go) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUviaDC101 Posted February 2, 2006 Share Posted February 2, 2006 BRUNELL IS GARBAGE!!! Gibbs For Life!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.