Duckus Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 come on the giants are so inconsistant. They lost to a vikings team that had less than 100 yards total offense or something ridiculous. Mark my words, if we win out, we make the playoffs. WE ARE INCONSISTANT!! We can't call the gaints inconsistant with what we have been doing this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phixius Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 I don't agree with Atlanta and the Vikes getting the two Wild Cards spots. I see the Bucs and one NFCE team (hopefully the Skins) I agree I dont see the Falcons especially in 3rd in NFCS getting a playoff spot. Vikings well I wait and see. Bucs have lost to teams with bad records(San Francisco, N.Y. Jets) I dont know the other 2 teams they lost to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FightForOldDC21 Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 campbell will be nice i kno it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCNightHawk Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 yah, but the vikings making the playoffs???? whats up with that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
red21skins Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Vikings have a chance, three of their last 4 are at home, their remaining four games: St. Louis, Pitt, At Baltimore, Chicago. They may have the best chance at an NFC wildcard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheLongshot Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 At great personal risk, I'm going to go ahead and say that I still think Dallas is a solid football team, and I certainly do not feel good about our chances to beat them in 2 weeks. Their D is still very good. They held the Giants to 10 offensive points at home... and save one or two meltdowns over the course of the season I haven't seen anyone have their way with the Cowboys D yet. To be honest, they aren't much different than us. The difference is that they had much better luck than we have. Jason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leonard Washington Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Question for mods or those in the know:How legitimate is this (about Campbell's development)? .... common sense tells you campbell isn't close to being ready--especially the way gibbs wants his qbs to perform. i would wager that ramsey and campbell can make more plays than brunell with their arm and athleticism respectively, however its the mistakes gibbs is more concerned. gibbs rather have a qb that won't throw for TDs as long as he doesn't throw INTs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 i still think the vikings are a fluke. they're def. gonna miss the playoffs. Brad Johnson is a seasoned veteran and won a SB. However, I think they have been playing on emotion and in a weak division. Anything can happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmiJo Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 common sense tells you campbell isn't close to being ready--especially the way gibbs wants his qbs to perform. i would wager that ramsey and campbell can make more plays than brunell with their arm and athleticism respectively, however its the mistakes gibbs is more concerned. gibbs rather have a qb that won't throw for TDs as long as he doesn't throw INTs. If QB was all about arm strength you may have been correct. However there is much more to it, like touch on a throw. In this respect, Brunell is so far superior to Ramsey that there is truly no comparison. Additionally, he can scramble and he can throw on the run. Neither of which Ramsey is particularly good at. Campbell, we just don't know yet... Brunell has plenty of arm BTW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobzmuda Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 common sense tells you campbell isn't close to being ready--especially the way gibbs wants his qbs to perform. i would wager that ramsey and campbell can make more plays than brunell with their arm and athleticism respectively, however its the mistakes gibbs is more concerned. gibbs rather have a qb that won't throw for TDs as long as he doesn't throw INTs. I think Leonard is on it. Don't think that since other rookie QBs are starting, that Campbell must be far behind them or that Campbell is lacking talent. Campbell is far from starting according to Gibbs' standards - which is relatively mistake-free ball. By that standard no other rookie QB is close to being ready to start either, despite their starting status. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 To be honest, they aren't much different than us. The difference is that they had much better luck than we have.Jason and likewise, I think we are a team that nobody wants to play, and nobody would think would be easy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 All sounds fair, although I think we'll see Campbell next year not in 2007, but I've been wrong before Then we'll be wrong together on this one. I see Brunell as starter without doubt barring injury and Campbell as #2 with a 3rd to be p/u as cheap as possible. With likely Campbell reliefs or starts being definitively planned for because of Brunell's wearing durbaility as he finishes this rest of this year and moves well into the next. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhead36 Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 The only team that really has us in a bad position is Tampa. We have to assume that they get the #1 WC. The division is within our grasp though, but we have to take it. A win and a Giants loss and...shockingly we will CONTROL OUR OWN DESTINY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heidenreich Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 I agree I dont see the Falcons especially in 3rd in NFCS getting a playoff spot. Vikings well I wait and see. Bucs have lost to teams with bad records(San Francisco, N.Y. Jets) I dont know the other 2 teams they lost to. They lost to Chicago, and they got blown out by Carolina. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terpfan Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Sounds fair to me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stevviej20 Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Do yall think we should draft a WR next season that can make big plays or should we focus on defense??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Question for mods or those in the know:How legitimate is this (about Campbell's development)? .... No idea. Besides, without putting him in the game, its all opinion anyway. I suggest you ask Joe Bugel in our upcoming chat. His reply would give you some idea what the thinking at Redskin's Park is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Walking Deadman Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 We played well in StL, however until we beat the Cardinals and then the Cowboys and have a rematch vs the Giants......no way do I think right now the Skins overtake them. We'll know in about 3 weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RIDETHEWALRUS Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 Good chat. Pretty reasonable assesment. If even a little favorable for us.zoony: I'm not in the know, but for what I've heard he just hasn't gotten the quick read aptitude yet. That's what he's missing right now. His physical delivery and mechanics are excellent though. What and Brunell does? Our current Qb has a 3 read progression, Moss then Cooley, then fumble. I think Cambell can handle that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tarhog Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 What and Brunell does? Our current Qb has a 3 read progression, Moss then Cooley, then fumble. I think Cambell can handle that. Come on man - you know thats a huge exaggeration. Brunell's looked more than a little tentative at times lately, but he's hardly a disaster. He's outright won games for us this year. He split double-coverage and hit Moss on a crucial 30 yarder yesterday. He's made mistakes, but certainly no more than most of the rest of the team. If you think it couldn't be far far worse, I'm guessing you're wrong. Theres a reason why NFL backups are almost always popular. They haven't gotten in there and screwed it all up yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiebear Posted December 5, 2005 Share Posted December 5, 2005 What and Brunell does? Our current Qb has a 3 read progression, Moss then Cooley, then fumble. I think Cambell can handle that. Your an idiot... He normally fumbles first then goes for the Moss / Cooley look . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.