flexxskins Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 how accurate do you think his statement was? http://www.redskins.com/news/multimedia.jsp?id=7520 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird_1972 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by flexxskins how accurate do you think his statement was? http://www.redskins.com/news/multimedia.jsp?id=7520 I feel that skins.com selects for third party assessments that cast the team in a positive light. Although I understand why that is so, it makes me look upon any report from that site with a grain or two of salt. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooper Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 After Joe stabbed Darrell Green in the back, I refuse to listen to a thing he says. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Joe will say whatever he feels will give him air/face time. He is correct in his assessment ( ), but not for the right reasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BG Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 I may be one of the few die hard fans of Joe's left. I think he was right on point. Agreed with everything. I hope they ditch fat a*s McGuire and keep Patrick and Joe for Monday night football. Just those two and ESPN's sideline reporters would be perfect in my book. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoony Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 I kind of like the banter back and forth between Joe and McGuire. Train wreck theory I guess... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jimster Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by BG I may be one of the few die hard fans of Joe's left. I think he was right on point. Agreed with everything. I hope they ditch fat a*s McGuire and keep Patrick and Joe for Monday night football. Just those two and ESPN's sideline reporters would be perfect in my book. I agree with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Master Jay Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Yes and so do I he knows what Joe Gibbs can do it's only a matter of time before he gets us back to being a football power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by bird_1972 I feel that skins.com selects for third party assessments that cast the team in a positive light. Although I understand why that is so, it makes me look upon any report from that site with a grain or two of salt. So, in your mind, are his numbers accurate? Or because the interview was done on that site, it's just even worth your opinion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hokie4redskins Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Forgive my naiveta, but how did JT stab Green in the back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsNut73 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by hokie4redskins Forgive my naiveta, but how did JT stab Green in the back? He said DG doesn't belong in the Hall of Fame. As for the topic...I think they can win that many games...definitely not out of reach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird_1972 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by Hooper After Joe stabbed Darrell Green in the back, I refuse to listen to a thing he says. What are you referring to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooper Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 He said DG said didn't belong in the hall of fame, which is unforgivable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bird_1972 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by flexxskins So, in your mind, are his numbers accurate? Or because the interview was done on that site, it's just even worth your opinion? No. No. That's not what I meant. I guess I just took this as an opportunity to point that observation out, irrespective of Theismann's commentary. Didn't think it merited a new thread topic. Sorry, didn't mean to hijack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 Although I am not a fan of Joe's ESPN commentating, I do agree with his accessment of the potential number of games that our team could win. I also agree with the segment where he compared the amount of pressure on coach Gibbs this season to last. There will be much more pressure, along with higher expectations this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfbovey Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Theisman thought Gibbs would be 10-6 last year. I will say, anything is possible. But really I think the expectations for me are at 8-8 maybe 9-7 for this season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thiebear Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 I think he is technically correct as he has repeated everything i said but i said 8-10 games as a realist... he said brunel the leftie got all the snaps in the beginning he said portis will run the routes he wants to run again he said ramsey came in in the middle of the season basically he was lurking on this board and stealing all my stuff :laugh: which of course came from: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinshog Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Joe Theismann stopped by Redskins Park earlier this week and spoke with Redskins.com's Larry Michael. Theismann said quarterback Patrick Ramsey is poised for a breakout year and that, if everything falls right, the Redskins could win 10-12 games next season. www.redskins.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinshog Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 woops, merge.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by bird_1972 No. No. That's not what I meant. I guess I just took this as an opportunity to point that observation out, irrespective of Theismann's commentary. Didn't think it merited a new thread topic. Sorry, didn't mean to hijack. Regardless of the site or Theisman... the new thread topic was simply a personal attempt at finding out just how many people here believe that those numbers are reachable. P.S. You did'nt hijack at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinshog Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by flexxskins Regardless of the site or Theisman... the new thread topic was simply a personal attempt at finding out just how many people here believe that those numbers are reachable. P.S. You did'nt hijack at all Anything is possible under Gibbs. Likely? Well, obviously the odds are against us. But I'm not doubting Gibbs after one bad season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrfriedm Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by zoony Joe will say whatever he feels will give him air/face time. He is correct in his assessment ( ), but not for the right reasons. Exactly, I couldn't have said it better myself. :thumbsup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 I like Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted June 15, 2005 Author Share Posted June 15, 2005 Originally posted by bubba9497 I like Joe Thats cool bubba, but what of the topic? 10-12 games, accurate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kosher Ham Posted June 15, 2005 Share Posted June 15, 2005 10-12 would be great. I think Joe is just jealous that DG is Mr. Redskin at this point.20 years.. I mean, come on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.