TradeTheBeal! Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 Also, Hunter is trending again. So you know some good stuff is gonna drop! 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ball Security Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 What cracks me up about when these cumstains’ PR rage tweet is that they always say “unselect committee”. It’s like, “we got ‘em now boss. We said ‘unselect’”. Losers. 1 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 13 minutes ago, Ball Security said: What cracks me up about when these cumstains’ PR rage tweet is that they always say “unselect committee”. It’s like, “we got ‘em now boss. We said ‘unselect’”. Losers. Yeah it's that ****ing 4th grade schoolyard taunt crap that Trump made popular on the right. "OH YEAH? WELL YOU'RE THE DUMBFACE LOSER COMMITTEE NOW, YOU POOPHEADS!" The saddest part is that the MAGAs lap it up and guffaw and think they've owned everyone. 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corcaigh Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 20 minutes ago, Ball Security said: What cracks me up about when these cumstains’ PR rage tweet is that they always say “unselect committee”. It’s like, “we got ‘em now boss. We said ‘unselect’”. Losers. From now on I will only refer to him as Tronald Dump 2 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 Honestly, what the right reminds me of now more than anything is almost everyone in the movie Idiocracy. The main difference is in Idiocracy it took 500 years for so many people to get so dumb. Here it only took a few decades. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 Someone with knowledge of Jackson's location on J6 was texting OK members. Jackson claims no knowledge of the OK (article from April 2022). WASHINGTON — In the most violent hour of the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, alleged conspirators in the attack who were aligned with the far-right group the Oath Keepers discussed providing security for U.S. Rep. Ronny Jackson, an Amarillo Republican, according to text messages made public in newly released court documents. “Ronnie Jackson (TX) office inside Capitol - he needs OK help. Anyone inside?” texted an unidentified person at 3 p.m., presumably referring to the Oath Keepers as “OK.” “Hopefully they can help. Dr. Jackson,” another person wrote at 3:03 p.m. A few minutes later, there was another call to provide help for the Texas congressman. “Dr. Ronnie Jackson - on the move. Needs protection. If anyone inside cover him,” a person texted at 3:08 p.m. and included a photo that could not be seen from the court documents. “He has critical data to protect,” the person added. At 3:10, Stewart Rhodes, the founder and leader of the Oath Keepers, responded to the text citing Jackson and instructed a person to “Give him my cell.” https://www.texastribune.org/2022/04/19/oath-keepers-ronny-jackson-texas-insurrection/ 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 Steve Bannon says he's willing to testify before January 6 committee after Trump waives claims of executive privilege Steve Bannon -- who defied a congressional subpoena and is set to go to trial on criminal contempt charges -- told the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, insurrection on Saturday that he is now willing to testify, ideally at a public hearing, according to a letter obtained by CNN. Bannon's reversal comes after he received a letter from former President Donald Trump waiving executive privilege, although both the House select committee and federal prosecutors contend that privilege claim never gave Bannon carte blanche to ignore a congressional subpoena in the first place. "When you first received the Subpoena to testify and provide documents, I invoked Executive Privilege. However, I watched how unfairly you and others have been treated, having to spend vast amounts of money on legal fees, and all of the trauma you must be going through for the love of your Country, and out of respect for the Office of the President," Trump wrote in a Saturday letter to Bannon, which was also obtained by CNN. "Therefore, if you reach an agreement on a time and place for your testimony, I will waive Executive Privilege for you, which allows you to go in and testify truthfully and fairly" Trump added, as he went on to decry the committee of "Thugs and Hacks." The letters were first reported by The Guardian. Bannon was charged last year with two counts of criminal contempt of Congress. He has argued that he was free to ignore his congressional subpoena in order to protect Trump's potential privilege claims. But federal prosecutors and other legal experts have argued that privilege does not apply to Bannon -- who left his White House gig as chief strategist years before the Capitol riot -- and did not give him the authority to refuse to provide any documents or testimony to the committee. Bannon's team provided Trump's new letter to the January 6 committee overnight, along with a letter from Bannon lawyer Bob Costello. "While Mr. Bannon has been steadfast in his convictions, circumstances have now changed," Costello wrote. "Mr. Bannon is willing to, and indeed prefers, to testify at your public hearing." Rep. Zoe Lofgren, a California Democrat who sits on the January 6 panel, told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union" on Sunday that the committee hasn't yet had a chance to discuss Bannon's letter, but that "I expect that we will be hearing from him and there are many questions that we have for him." Bannon, who has pleaded not guilty to his contempt charges, was set to go to trial July 18. Providing testimony would not necessarily absolve him of the criminal contempt charges he faces, so it's unclear how his upcoming trial would be affected if Bannon strikes a deal with the committee to testify. He is set to appear in court for a hearing in his case Monday. Click on the link for the full article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 Click for the full thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted July 10, 2022 Share Posted July 10, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 I'm thinking Ronnie gonna have some explaining to do after the J6 hearings on Tuesday... 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Momma There Goes That Man Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 On 7/10/2022 at 11:38 AM, Ball Security said: What cracks me up about when these cumstains’ PR rage tweet is that they always say “unselect committee”. It’s like, “we got ‘em now boss. We said ‘unselect’”. Losers. i hope everyone realizes this is how they sound when they are in the stadium and calling the cowboys, eagles, giants Seahawks etc dumb names 4 1 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 “Crazy eyes” just doesn’t even hardly cover it. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Captain Wiggles Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 Lady is clearly not informed how sentencing in our judicial system works. You can easily get 45 days in prison in NC for a misdemeanor drug conviction. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 The thread on Bannon's defeat in court today is interesting, and this quote is after a bunch of what his lawyers were trying, failed. But still. By itself.... "If there are no defenses" is pretty spot on. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 6 minutes ago, @DCGoldPants said: The thread on Bannon's defeat in court today is interesting, and this quote is after a bunch of what his lawyers were trying, failed. But still. By itself.... "If there are no defenses" is pretty spot on. The judge shut down Bannon completely (or damn close to it)...that thread was a wonderful read lol... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TradeTheBeal! Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 There’s a Greg Manusky joke in there somewhere. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 51 minutes ago, @DCGoldPants said: The thread on Bannon's defeat in court today is interesting, and this quote is after a bunch of what his lawyers were trying, failed. But still. By itself.... "If there are no defenses" is pretty spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
@DCGoldPants Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 1 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mistertim Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 3 hours ago, TradeTheBeal! said: “Crazy eyes” just doesn’t even hardly cover it. Um. You can to go jail for up to a year for several misdemeanor offenses. She actually got off pretty light. According to D.C. Code §22-3302, "Unlawful entry on property" can be punished by up to 6 months in jail. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bang Posted July 11, 2022 Share Posted July 11, 2022 Pretty sure she's usually all for being tough on criminals. ~Bang 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted July 12, 2022 Share Posted July 12, 2022 Oath Keepers lawyer says Stewart Rhodes wanted her Trump contacts before Jan. 6 Capitol attack In the weeks leading up to the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, Oath Keepers founder Stewart Rhodes tried to get the organization’s general counsel, Kellye SoRelle, to put him in touch with the White House, she told NBC News. In addition to her work with the Oath Keepers, SoRelle was a volunteer for Lawyers for Trump during the 2020 election and was in contact with many of the people fighting a doomed legal battle to try to overturn the 2020 presidential election and keep former President Donald Trump in office. The contacts include, she said, people in Rudy Giuliani’s and Sidney Powell’s camps, as well as those inside the administration, although she added that she “wasn’t, like, communicating with Trump directly.” Rhodes wanted her to put him in touch with the White House. “He was hitting me up for a contact,” said SoRelle, a family law lawyer who previously ran for the Texas state House. “He didn’t have any access points.” As he prepared an open letter calling on Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act in the weeks leading up to Jan. 6, 2021, Rhodes asked SoRelle to send it to the White House. She says she declined. As SoRelle tells it, despite her close relationship with Rhodes, she never put him in touch with key figures, putting a firewall between her work with the Oath Keepers and her work to overturn the election results. Nonetheless, she was on the grounds of the U.S. Capitol (although didn’t enter the building) on Jan. 6. And on the night before the attack, she was present in a parking garage as Rhodes met with Enrique Tarrio, the head of the Proud Boys, the other predominant organization in a smorgasbord of extremist groups connected with the Capitol attack. SoRelle has already spoken extensively with the Jan. 6 committee, and given her overlapping roles, it’s likely that testimony will come up at the panel’s next public hearing Tuesday, much of which the committee has said will focus on the role of the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys and the goal they shared with Trump to stop the certification of the Electoral College votes. A source familiar with the Jan. 6 committee’s work said SoRelle was of great interest to the committee given her links both in Trump’s orbit and with members of the alleged seditious conspiracy. Her dual role could play a part as the committee tries to establish a deeper connection between both camps. “Where there’s smoke, there’s fire,” the person said. Click on the link for the full article Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
China Posted July 12, 2022 Share Posted July 12, 2022 4 hours ago, @DCGoldPants said: 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted July 12, 2022 Author Share Posted July 12, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmirOfShmo Posted July 12, 2022 Share Posted July 12, 2022 Interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cooked Crack Posted July 12, 2022 Author Share Posted July 12, 2022 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now