Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins
Forum Rules and Guidelines

Moose & Squirrel v Boris & Natasha: what's the deal with the rooskies and trumpland?

Jumbo

By Jumbo
in The Tailgate

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bang

Bang

Posted
Posted

I think that chart presented as a closing defense seals the fact he is guilty. Of every single bit of it.

 

Personally, i i were on the jury, that would remove all reasonable doubt, based on the fact that they think that is a reasonable method of defense.

 

~Bang

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Larry

Larry

Posted
Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Bang said:

I think that chart presented as a closing defense seals the fact he is guilty. Of every single bit of it.

 

Personally, i i were on the jury, that would remove all reasonable doubt, based on the fact that they think that is a reasonable method of defense.

 

~Bang

 

Eh, I think they're inviting the jury to "use the force", ignore the evidence, and just acquit anyway. 

 

It's kind of like "no collusion". Yeah, the top three people in the Trump campaign met with a representative of the Russian government, for the specific purpose of negotiating what it would take, to get Russia to help them. Yeah, hours after that meeting, Donald Trump himself publicly announced that he was expecting to be receiving some juicy dirt on Hillary, real soon. Yeah, a week after that meeting, the Trump campaign altered the GOP platform, to be friendlier to Russia. Yeah, two weeks after that, Russia published the first chunk of stolen emails. 

 

BUT, nobody has produced a video recording to Trump, personally, promising that he would be Putin's love slave, if the Russian government would hack the election for him. 

 

Therefore, Trump has been proven completely innocent. 

Edited by Larry
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DogofWar1

DogofWar1

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, Cooked Crack said:
Rand trying to be the Dana Rohrabacher of the Senate

 

Rand Paul is unabashedly a Russian asset, and he doesn't care who knows.

 

A vote for Rand is absolutely a vote for Russian interests, and every voter with internet access or a tv has no real excuse for knowing better.

 

It's too bad he's there until 2022...unless Mueller gets him.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseBlitz

PleaseBlitz

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, visionary said:

More Trump publicly abusing his power (hint- impeach the ****er -hint) to take revenge on people.

 

Meh, McConnell's wife is, by all accounts, a competent cabinet official.  As far as Trump's abuses of power go, this is WAY down a very long list.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
visionary

visionary

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, PleaseBlitz said:

 

Meh, McConnell's wife is, by all accounts, a competent cabinet official.  As far as Trump's abuses of power go, this is WAY down a very long list.  

That wasn’t the abuse I was talking about. That’s more typical hypocrisy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
visionary

visionary

Posted
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, PleaseBlitz said:

 

How so?  

I’m not sure I understand your question.  The abuse I was talking about was what I said, using his presidential power to take revenge on or attempt to silence critics or legal/political opponents. The hypocrisy is complaining about something someone else is doing or he thinks/says they are doing while he is doing something similar.

Edited by visionary
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chachie

Chachie

Posted
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, visionary said:

I’m not sure I understand your question.  The abuse I was talking about was what I said, using his presidential power to take revenge on or attempt to silence critics or legal/political opponents. The hypocrisy is complaining about something someone else is doing or he thinks/says they are doing while he is doing something similar.

 

 

He's not revoking clearance from people who criticize him. He's revoking clearance from potential witnesses. 

 

https://twitter.com/MaddowBlog/status/1030265835376574464

Edited by Chachie
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PleaseBlitz

PleaseBlitz

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, visionary said:

I’m not sure I understand your question.  The abuse I was talking about was what I said, using his presidential power to take revenge on or attempt to silence critics or legal/political opponents. The hypocrisy is complaining about something someone else is doing or he thinks/says they are doing while he is doing something similar.

 

Gotcha.  I thought that tweet was saying that it was an abuse of power for McConnell's wife to be SecTrans (and therefore "on Trump's payroll"), while McConnell (ostensibly) has some oversight over Trump.  

 

The hypocrisy is obvious, for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...