Jump to content
Washington Football Team Logo
Extremeskins

Convicted Cop-Killer Mumia Abu-Jamal's Death Sentence Commuted to Life in Prison


capcrunch98

Recommended Posts

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20111207_D_A__wont_seek_death_penalty_for_Mumia_Abu-Jamal.html?cmpid=124488429

Everything I've read about this case implies the guy is guilty. There are a few things that have come up after the original trial (most notably the recanting of witness statements) which for some people could generate suspicion, but certainly nothing I can see that would explain why he gets unlimited appeals (it's been 30 years!) and half of the planet is convinced of his innocence and is taking up his cause.

Unreal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/breaking/20111207_D_A__wont_seek_death_penalty_for_Mumia_Abu-Jamal.html?cmpid=124488429

Everything I've read about this case implies the guy is guilty. There are a few things that have come up after the original trial (most notably the recanting of witness statements) which for some people could generate suspicion, but certainly nothing I can see that would explain why he gets unlimited appeals (it's been 30 years!) and half of the planet is convinced of his innocence and is taking up his cause.

Unreal.

Dude is guilty.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a such a farce of a judicial system - what more do you need? There are eye-witnesses, he confessed. This SCUMBAG should have been 6 feet under 20 years ago.

RIP Officer Faulkner, and God watch over your poor wife, who STILL can't put this **** to bed.

Several of those witnesses recanted, there is no actual confession, and a lot of the "facts" people believe are not actually found in the trial record. Like I said before, I think he is probably guilty, but there are some troubling aspects to this case.

And I feel for Officer Faulkner's wife, but executing Mumia isn't going to bring her husband back. He has no possibility of parole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is a such a farce of a judicial system - what more do you need? There are eye-witnesses, he confessed. This SCUMBAG should have been 6 feet under 20 years ago.

RIP Officer Faulkner, and God watch over your poor wife, who STILL can't put this **** to bed.

you make it seem like he's being released.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Several of those witnesses recanted, there is no actual confession, and a lot of the "facts" people believe are not actually found in the trial record. Like I said before, I think he is probably guilty, but there are some troubling aspects to this case.

And I feel for Officer Faulkner's wife, but executing Mumia isn't going to bring her husband back. He has no possibility of parole.

He's a big ass celebrity in jail, you know, "giving it to the man". He spews hate and racism, killed a cop, and should be burning in hell for the last 20 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a big ass celebrity in jail, you know, "giving it to the man". He spews hate and racism, killed a cop, and should be burning in hell for the last 20 years.

I'm not a supporter of his, but I don't agree with this characterization either. Claiming you were framed is not "spewing hate and racism."

Honestly, a lot of people who want Mumia executed seem to want it more to get back at all the leftists and intellectuals than any other reason. :whoknows:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's assume that your wish were granted. Let's construct, in our heads, an alternate reality in which everything is the same, except the guy got executed 20 years ago.

So now we're in this alternate universe. Where all the witnesses have gone public and announced that they've changed their minds. Where all of the other inconsistencies (I don't remember what they are. But whatever they are, they're the same ones we have in the real world, today.), are still inconsistencies.

If everything were the same, today, except that the guy has been dead for 10 years . . .

Would that be a better world? If we were finding all this stuff out after we'd executed somebody?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's assume that your wish were granted. Let's construct, in our heads, an alternate reality in which everything is the same, except the guy got executed 20 years ago.

So now we're in this alternate universe. Where all the witnesses have gone public and announced that they've changed their minds. Where all of the other inconsistencies (I don't remember what they are. But whatever they are, they're the same ones we have in the real world, today.), are still inconsistencies.

If everything were the same, today, except that the guy has been dead for 10 years . . .

Would that be a better world? If we were finding all this stuff out after we'd executed somebody?

After you execute somebody, people stop looking very hard to find stuff out. That's simple reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After you execute somebody, people stop looking very hard to find stuff out. That's simple reality.

I'm well aware of that fact.

But I didn't want to come out and say that people want faster executions because it would result in less truth coming out.

But I do think there's an element of that. "If we'd just executed this guy 10 years ago, then we wouldn't know all these things."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Everyone has their own opinion, based on their own circumstances, based on their own beliefs. I don't care about an alternate universe. I advocate for executing this killer and you cannot possibly change my mind.

No matter what the facts are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm well aware of that fact.

But I didn't want to come out and say that people want faster executions because it would result in less truth coming out.

But I do think there's an element of that. "If we'd just executed this guy 10 years ago, then we wouldn't know all these things."

Well, they do in Virginia. They've passed laws of very aggressive timelines when new evidence, even exculpatory evidence can be introduced into the court system and limits on what exactly can be introduced. Virginia is one of the most aggressive death states. All due to Republican leadership in that state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The facts are this:

He was convicted of murdering a Philly cop in cold blood. Many appeal courts have upheld the conviction.

And the EXACT same courts also cancelled his death sentence because of irregularities at his trial and sent it back for a do-over. Was that ruling bad while the others were good?

So here we are. He's in prison and he's never getting out. I'm good with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The facts are this:

He was convicted of murdering a Philly cop in cold blood. Many appeal courts have upheld the conviction.

And a federal judge, and the court of appeals, and the USSC, all agreed that his SENTANCING was unfair.

---------- Post added December-7th-2011 at 08:50 PM ----------

And the EXACT same courts also cancelled his death sentence because of irregularities at his trial and sent it back for a do-over. Was that ruling bad while the others were good?

So here we are. He's in prison and he's never getting out. I'm good with that.

Is he? (Never getting out.).

The article says the DA has decided not to ask for the death penalty, this time. But I assume that there's still going to be some kind of sentencing.

Do we know that he result is going to be life without parole? Or could he just get plain old life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the EXACT same courts also cancelled his death sentence because of irregularities at his trial and sent it back for a do-over. Was that ruling bad while the others were good?

So here we are. He's in prison and he's never getting out. I'm good with that.

Is he? (Never getting out.).

The article says the DA has decided not to ask for the death penalty, this time. But I assume that there's still going to be some kind of sentencing.

Do we know that he result is going to be life without parole? Or could he just get plain old life?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And a federal judge, and the court of appeals, and the USSC, all agreed that his SENTANCING was unfair.

---------- Post added December-7th-2011 at 08:50 PM ----------

Is he? (Never getting out.).

The article says the DA has decided not to ask for the death penalty, this time. But I assume that there's still going to be some kind of sentencing.

Do we know that he result is going to be life without parole? Or could he just get plain old life?

Nope, its LWOP. Life without possibility of parole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Me, I still "believe in" the death penalty. My reasoning is that I think that some crimes, death is Justice.

(Including some things that don't get the death penalty, right now. For example, if Sandusky is as guilty as I suspect he is, then I wouldn't have a problem with a death penalty for him.)

(And, from reading what this guy was supposedly convicted of, I can see the claim that this is one of those cases).

But I do have to admit that, he more I see of cases where people have pretty much been framed, at least somewhat, and cases where DAs have spent decades fighting to CONCEAL evidence from the court's consideration, (and seeing the posts from the people who seem to think hat this is some kind of contest, and their side scores a touchdown whenever they get to kill somebody), that my support for the thing certainly isn't what it once was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't see a reason to have a death penalty. It doesn't prevent anything. It won't bring back the victims. It won't give any peace to those left behind.

And honestly, what sucks more? Being out to sleep ten years after you're convicted or know that you will be spending every second of every minute of the rest of your life behind bars, avoiding rape in the shower.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...