Farbod21 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Adam_Schefter Redskins put originial comp. low tender on CB Carlos Rogers -- $1.542 million. Any team that signs him must give Redskins a 1. Won't happen half a minute ago via web Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky52Mc Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Ballin! Welcome back C-los Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elkabong82 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Aaron Rodgers got a 1st rd tender? lol. Carlos Rogers, interestingly enough, has a tender which makes him tradeable as well, though not as much as Rocky. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redskindan07 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 I doubt we could get a 4 rounder for him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
santana_4_prez Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 I'm sure he'll turn on the water faucets and cry about that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero21 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 I like how cheap these tenders are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Santana_Fan Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 I hope Shanahan can work some trades like the ones he's gotten us with lol. Of course he doesn't have a dumb GM like Cerrato to pick on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Est.1974 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Stick him on the same list as JC & Rocky. No long-term deal = We would like to trade you, bank the pick & replace you with an UFA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Aaron Rodgers got a 1st rd tender? lol. :ols:OP you might want to edit your thread title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flexxskins Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Ballin! Welcome back C-losA.K.A- hands of stone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farbod21 Posted March 3, 2010 Author Share Posted March 3, 2010 :ols:OP you might want to edit your thread title. You can only tender a current player. If people are too dumb to figure it out, then there is nothing I can do for them. :mad: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FunBunch7 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 I would feel absolutely GUILTY if anyone signed him and we had to give so much as a 7th rounder for him. I heard his mom has a video of him once intercepting a pass in high school...I find this very hard to believe... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travdaskin Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 I like how cheap these tenders are. NO CBA = All those who were going to get paid as Free Agents are going to get SCREWED this Free-Agency for being Restricted... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metalhead Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 You can only tender a current player. If people are too dumb to figure it out, then there is nothing I can do for them.:mad: I think you missed his point. Look again at your title... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manny555 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 You can only tender a current player. If people are too dumb to figure it out, then there is nothing I can do for them.:mad: You misspelled "Rodgers". Our "Rodgers" is actually "Rogers"!!!!! ahahahaha That's how you spell Aaron "Rodgers"!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soup Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 This no cap stuff is pretty cool Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DarrellsMyHero28 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 No one is going to give up a first for Carlos, looks like he'll be around for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farbod21 Posted March 3, 2010 Author Share Posted March 3, 2010 :doh1: Sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfbovey Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 No one is going to give up a first for Carlos, looks like he'll be around for a while. Depends on whether the Redskins are willing to negotiate. I'm sure if a team came to them with a reasonable offer, they'd listen. They don't HAVE to take a 1st rounder for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrepDC Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 No CBA = JC, Rocky, and Los are RFA = One year to earn a long term deal with the new regime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Metalhead Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 :doh1:Sorry. Haha, it's all good. It was worth a chuckle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Is it the first round tender, or the original round tender? I know in theory they both equal a first rounder, but can we except less in a trade for 'Los than a first if its the original tender, as we could if it was the actual first round tender? Am I making sense? Who knows! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enter Apotheosis Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Is it the first round tender, or the original round tender? I know in theory they both equal a first rounder, but can we except less in a trade for 'Los than a first if its the original tender, as we could if it was the actual first round tender? Am I making sense? Who knows! In this case it doesn't make any difference. What tender we give a player only determines the ceiling of what we can negotiate for in a trade and in this case the ceiling is the same either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xero21 Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 Is it the first round tender, or the original round tender? I know in theory they both equal a first rounder, but can we except less in a trade for 'Los than a first if its the original tender, as we could if it was the actual first round tender? Am I making sense? Who knows! The teams are always allowed to negotiate, no matter which kind of tender it is. Though this one is the original round tender, so it's less money for Rogers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Conn Posted March 3, 2010 Share Posted March 3, 2010 In this case it doesn't make any difference. What tender we give a player only determines the ceiling of what we can negotiate for in a trade and in this case the ceiling is the same either way. Thank you, I wasn't sure I had phrased that in an understandable manner haha. But that is a plus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.