rd421 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I have a feeling we'll be drafting the BPA at 13.And I'm fine with that. I am also fine with that unless it is a WR...or a CB or Safety:2cents: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skinz248 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Man JT did not make any friends around here last year did he? Srioulsy give the guy a break he was HURT I am willing to give him another shot but not for $8 MIL! Marcus Washington was hurt last year too and they CUT him. AND he proved to the fans that he was a great player FOR the REDSKINS. JT HASN'T DONE **** FOR US YET. Like I said I don't mind that we keep him around, but take a pay cut. He came out and admitted that he was not worth the money we paid him last year. To me that means he SHOULD want to restructure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yeen80 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Before we consider trading down, We need to make some personell moves first. If we can sign Dockery and another interior D-Lineman, maybe we can trade down for more pics. We need to upgrade first and foremost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
That Redskins Fan Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I have a feeling we'll be drafting the BPA at 13.And I'm fine with that. I agree as well if Big al and dock come back.. I can see that taking place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I agree as well if Big al and dock come back.. I can see that taking place Even if those two come to the Skins, who's playing ROT? If we are relying on Heyer or Jansen, then it's simply :doh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
angel2 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I don't think we're seriously going after Haynesworth.:2cents: Time will tell though. Dead on the money (no pun intended). I think the front office is raising the stakes for the Giants or whomever. Signing Haynesworth would be a bone-headed move and a bigggg step back to the good ole days of Dan Snyder's version 1.0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillyKilmer Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 It is a long off season A deep draft at OT Many payers yet to be released Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hailskinz1991 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Yeah go get Dock!! He was a product of the system here in Washington. Kinda like Trotter in Philly. Would love to have him back!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lar0n Landry Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Make it happen!! I would love to have Dock back! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hubbs Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I can't figure out a single reason not to make this move. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Pursue him for much less than the Bills paid him... He'd be an upgrade over our current LG, but the the other LG could now be a back-up. I forget his name at the moment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DonMagicJuan Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 best news i heard all year from the redskins.....if we get dockery, ill be so happy! i think i can speak for the most of us when i say that... Dockery....along with Canty, a LB or DE in the 1st round....man does this sound good so far....only thing that gets me is the whole haynesworth talks....if we get albert, then we dont have money for nothing i alreayd mentioned... and also IF DHALL signs....i think Vinny will get an A from me for the offseason.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 At 13 is there a stud OL that will be available? I would hate to draft OL just for the Sake of taking OL in round 1 I totally agree. I am against taking OL for the sake of taking OL. If someone is worthy of #13 and could contribute and is a sure bet, then let's take him. Someone like Andre Smith. He would probably start at RT. If no one is available at #13 that is worth #13, we should trade down and pick up more picks and find a stud linemen whether OL or DL later on in the late first round or even a LB. Those are out three biggest needs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Course, you assume that if we don't sign Hall, it is because we low-balled him. I don't assume. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 best news i heard all year from the redskins.....if we get dockery, ill be so happy! i think i can speak for the most of us when i say that...Dockery....along with Canty, a LB or DE in the 1st round....man does this sound good so far....only thing that gets me is the whole haynesworth talks....if we get albert, then we dont have money for nothing i alreayd mentioned... and also IF DHALL signs....i think Vinny will get an A from me for the offseason.... D. Hall is a must... 25 year old game changer and two-time pro bowler... Dockery would be awesome here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sebowski Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Dock got paid, now he needs to come home at a reasonable rate. I like Kendall much more as a backup. He won't wear down as much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cphil006 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 It is a long off seasonA deep draft at OT Many payers yet to be released Dockery is a guard. We need a tackle as well. Jansen/Heyer aren't getting it done. Heyer would be a great back-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheismannQuote Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I don't assume. Cryptic. The other 'deep throat' thread made notion of NE chasing D. Hall. Espn football "rumors" is now reporting the same thing... Thing is, they have less cap space than us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExoDus84 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I give 4 thumbs up to bringing back dock! Would greatly upgrade our line and allow kendall to move to the backup position, which is where he should be. Then, with our 1st round pick, we grab an OT to hopefully start, making heyer a backup, and would provide solid depth. After that, we extend hall, sign canty, and use our 3rd rounder on a good LB or DT for depth. I dont think we need fat albert here. As dominant as he could be, he would hamstring us finacially, and thats not what we need when we have too many gaps to fill. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mi6 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Which team in their right mind would want to trade for Carlos? Are you kidding me! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheismannQuote Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Which team in their right mind would want to trade for Carlos? Are you kidding me! Lions? http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/02/26/panthers-lucas-wont-accept-trade-to-detroit-may-get-cut/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capt Rich Fla Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Dock should come back for the cheap....bey bye Kendall and then we're back to the line we had a few years ago.... sweeeeeeeeet :doh: (only older) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Lions?http://nfl.fanhouse.com/2009/02/26/panthers-lucas-wont-accept-trade-to-detroit-may-get-cut/ Panthers tried to trade Ken Lucas but he put the kibosh on the deal. They could be takers for Rogers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Passizle Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I seriously doubt that the Skins can afford Dockery, Hall and Haynesworth with our cap situation as it is.Something just doesn't feel right. There's another shoe that needs to drop soon... Haynesworth will not be a Redskin in the near future. Bank it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oldskool Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Haynesworth will not be a Redskin in the near future. Bank it! ~7 hours to go. We'll see. This doesn't look like a ruse to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.