Spartacus87 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 EVERYTHING hinges on resigning Hall. Once you have him signed you then cut Springs & persue Haynesworth. If we lowball Hall & **** that up, chances are he goes on to the Pats. And we're stuck with Springs/Smoot/Rogers. Unless Rogers gets traded later on. Hall might want too much money than he's really worth. I don't think we should pay an arm and a leg to get him back necessarily, he's the one with the incredibly spotty record so far in the league.Trading Rogers would be stupid in any situation, but especially trading him if he's all we're left with, leaving Springs and Smoot as our starting corners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CRobi21 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Some great news on ES today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dswerdlw Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Doc, Canty, Hall, and Hunter Smith are on my wish list. We do need someone to challenge Suisham. Who's out there? I agree that Haynesworth limits are flexibility too much down the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
21DIEHARDSKINSFAN21 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 are we forgetting about the uncapped year of next year that we can release people with no cap hits? people stop thinkin they gona be here til 2014, they not gonna be here after this year. but i think we should give dock his lg spot, move kendall to lg and heyer on the rt, have rinehart to be lt when ready and all we need is a center and rg to replace. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky52Mc Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 are we forgetting about the uncapped year of next year that we can release people with no cap hits? people stop thinkin they gona be here til 2014, they not gonna be here after this year. but i think we should give dock his lg spot, move kendall to lg and heyer on the rt, have rinehart to be lt when ready and all we need is a center and rg to replace. Ok, correct me if I'm wrong, but if you release someone with a 7 year contract, doesn't it haunt you for 7 YEARS. Not 1, but EVERY year. EDIT: and why the hell would we sign someone we knew we were gonna release? dude cmon, get some knowledge in your posts, I know we have a bad history, but SERIOUSLY? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thecardiacrll Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I have a bad feeling were not gonna sign Hall or haynesworth....Its just a feeling im getting in my gut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky52Mc Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I have a bad feeling were not gonna sign Hall or haynesworth....Its just a feeling im getting in my gut. Sometimes, that's not really a bad thing. If we didn't sign Haynes it's because Mike Florio won't STFU about how we're most likely "Violating FA policies and should be hit with tampering!" and then we wouldn't sign him. Anyways, not signing D.hall wouldn't be killer, he's a playmaker and all, but he will be expensive regardless. Somehow, I'm sure he and Dan think that 2 wierd interceptions = 25mil guarenteed 6 year 55 million. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WSHRedskins3ATLBraves3 Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 I don't know what the market for Dockery will be, but I'm not sure I'd want him for more than a 2 (max 3) year deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Canadian Hog Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Even if we do resign Dockery, we should make a concerted effort to address the guard position through the draft if the opportunity is there. Randy Thomas is just not getting any younger. I realize it might simply be speculation on the part of JLC in regards to D-Dock, but if it is indeed true and this is the course of action the Redskins take... Why make a concerted effort to address the guard position through the draft when you can check the latest ticker from ESPN, fly by the seat of your pants, and build a team based on who teams release? Seriously though, the donkeys running our organization have no sense of direction. Does this make any sense? Dockery signs with Buffalo (we deem him to be too expensive - fair enough). We follow that up by having nothing on the roster able to fill in for his void (most successful teams would be proactive in this regard and have a security blanket/back up plan in the event of the reality of a guy leaving via Free Agency). We mostly refuse to address the guard position after Dockery leaves via the draft. Years later, we might very well find ourselves going back to the well one more time and welcoming Dockery back again. Mismanagement has its fingerprints all over this franchise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Tater Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 Yes, Springs. I don't think anything will be done with Springs until Hall agrees to something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Full Monty Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 nice we get to keep griffin for another 10 years. exciting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatmeworry Posted February 26, 2009 Share Posted February 26, 2009 While we are strolling down memory lane, Bills also cut Robert Royal. HAHA! Good one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kvarlo12000 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I realize it might simply be speculation on the part of JLC in regards to D-Dock, but if it is indeed true and this is the course of action the Redskins take...Why make a concerted effort to address the guard position through the draft when you can check the latest ticker from ESPN, fly by the seat of your pants, and build a team based on who teams release? Seriously though, the donkeys running our organization have no sense of direction. Does this make any sense? Dockery signs with Buffalo (we deem him to be too expensive - fair enough). We follow that up by having nothing on the roster able to fill in for his void (most successful teams would be proactive in this regard and have a security blanket/back up plan in the event of the reality of a guy leaving via Free Agency). We mostly refuse to address the guard position after Dockery leaves via the draft. Years later, we might very well find ourselves going back to the well one more time and welcoming Dockery back again. Mismanagement has its fingerprints all over this franchise. well i belirvr thi difference here is the contracts. we didn't resign him b/c he wanted too much cash. thry released him b/c they paid too much cash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExoDus84 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Ok, correct me if I'm wrong, but if you release someone with a 7 year contract, doesn't it haunt you for 7 YEARS. Not 1, but EVERY year.EDIT: and why the hell would we sign someone we knew we were gonna release? dude cmon, get some knowledge in your posts, I know we have a bad history, but SERIOUSLY? Yeah, even in an uncapped year when we can clear some dead cap, I still doubt we sign haynesworth as a 1 year rental. Doesnt make football sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alwaysaskin Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 I think bringing Dock back would be great, we get younger and better at LG and Dock benefits from having Bugel coach him again. Come back Dock! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roanoker Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 It would be great to have Doc back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turbodiesel#44 Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 Man JT did not make any friends around here last year did he? Srioulsy give the guy a break he was HURTI'd like to keep him for another year, but he's not worth $8M. We could do better with that money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWJ Posted February 27, 2009 Share Posted February 27, 2009 The only way we could even consider signing AH is by cutting both JT and Springs. I want to say again, I am not for signing AH, but even signing Jason Brown, Canty, Hall we need to have the money and unless they cut one or both of these guys, I don't see how we can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.