JaimeDeCurry Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Reed eats nails and poops out M-1 abrams tanks.. Yo' damn right he does! :applause: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ffxdrummer Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 I'm sure you all heard about the time Reed Doughty visited The Virgin Islands, and how they're now to be known simply as The Islands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxpck Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 ok so you admit your wrong congrats.and campbell completely blew his zone.HAD CAMPBELL NOT BLOWN HIS ZONE THAT BOSS CLEARLY RAN THROUGH he should have at the very least carried with boss up the field handing him off to doughty. campbell sucked up on the run eliminating himself from the play,and eli threw the ball to the open man. Listen Dude Where did I ever say that Reed was responsible for the London TO touchdown.? But if it makes you feel good, I was wrong to call the tampa 2 a cover 3 deep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chow184 Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Listen DudeWhere did I ever say that Reed was responsible for the London TO touchdown.? But if it makes you feel good, I was wrong to call the tampa 2 a cover 3 deep. you said reed gave up 2TD's to TO,and the previous post was about the Boss TD that Doughty wasn't responsible for. like I said don't pull stuff out your *** or else I'll get the hose out to clean it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ffxdrummer Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 We were so close... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Califan007 The Constipated Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 So nobody else likes waffles, then?... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrepDC Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 All that roaming is because Landry is now a free safety. I figured you would know that since you are playing safety for a local D-1 school. That was my point... both safeties aren't always responsible for over the top when the cb's are in man coverage, as you suggested. I actually learned that in high school. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CallMeGreen Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 He had 6 solo tackles and 10 total. :doh: OK, but how many more were missed? I remember several missed arm tackles where Jacobs was the knife and Doughty was the butter. Reed "I Doughty can tackle" still needs to work on certain aspects of his game. The dude on the left is not afraid of RD. Then again, I'm not sure they've met. I like the spirit of the OPs thread. However, I'm not ready to put Reed on the Ring of Honor yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxpck Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 I am done bickering with you kids. You obviously know more about football and the position of safety than I do. You are a wonderful judge of talent and Reed Doughty is going to be the next ST. He has wonderful pass coverage instincts and never looks lost. I doubt he will be picked on this weekend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxpck Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 That was my point... both safeties aren't always responsible for over the top when the cb's are in man coverage, as you suggested. I actually learned that in high school. You are right. GW always employs man on man coverage and no over the top help from his safeties always. He trusts he DB to do it all. Especially on the 5 plays I pointed out originally. Gw usually calls on his DB's to be one on one outside of blitzes. Obviously the 5 plays I pointed out had blitzers I didnt see. You obviously know more than I do about football and especially the position of safety. You are a great judge of talent. Reed is going to be a great. He has such seamless mechanics in pass coverage. I am sorry I doubted you. Reed wont be gameplanned against this week. Who would dare? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumbo Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Great thread HH :notworthy , and great contributions. :applause: A fine discussion on SS & Cover-2 schemes, but as suggested, how about one of you starting a new thread for it and our future coverage needs. Alllow this one to be for fun as intended. And avoid the insults--you were doing well but it's betting closer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrepDC Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 I am done bickering with you kid.You obviously know more about football and the position of safety than I do. You are a wonderful judge of talent and Reed Doughty is going to be the next ST. He has wonderful pass coverage instincts and never looks lost. I doubt he will be picked on this weekend. If you look at my posts I never said anything about Reed being the next ST. I wasn't even defending him to be honest. I was just pointing out some mistakes in the comments you made about the safety position, that's all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxpck Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Great thread HH :notworthy , and great contributions. :applause: A fine discussion on SS & Cover-2 schemes, but as suggested, how about one of you starting a new thread for it and our future coverage needs. Alllow this one to be for fun as intended. And avoid the insults--you were doing well but it's betting closer. Sorry Jumbo. Just get caught up some times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chow184 Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 I am done bickering with you kid.You obviously know more about football and the position of safety than I do. You are a wonderful judge of talent and Reed Doughty is going to be the next ST. He has wonderful pass coverage instincts and never looks lost. I doubt he will be picked on this weekend. haha I doubt he's gonna be the next ST but I think he's capable of being solid/a good backup . I just think it's funny to spot out people ACTING like they know what they're talking about and you clearly didn't,you half heartedly admit you wrong and continue to take jabs at me. woo your the man now dog! reed doughty has 2 speeds walk and kill There is no chin behind Reed Doughty's chin strap. There is only another fist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxpck Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 If you look at my posts I never said anything about Reed being the next ST. I wasn't even defending him to be honest. I was just pointing out some mistakes in the comments you made about the safety position, that's all. Sorry to get all bunched up. The comments were meant for the 5 plays I originally talked about. Not the safety position as a whole. Safeties (and strong safeties) are one of the most dynamic positions on the field, the 5 plays I orignally called Reed out on were plays were he distincly had over the top pass coverage responsibility. Obviously he wont always have that. i am just worried that other teams are going to react when he does, a la Archuletta. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
z0eboy Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 please enlighten me to the job of the MLB in the tampa 2 then. even deion pointed it out that that sent TO up the middle to exploit that match up. TO flipped his hips left making fletcher believe he was running a crossing route and flipped back darting right into and through the void that would have been fletchers zone. :laugh: its the safties job to cover over top the WR he should made a better play on the ball instead of your MLB :doh: thats why they call it cover 2 the safties cover deep halfs of the field in a zone like coverage :doh1: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxpck Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 haha I doubt he's gonna be the next ST but I think he's capable of being solid/a good backup . I just think it's funny to spot out people ACTING like they know what they're talking about and you clearly didn't,you half heartedly admit you wrong and continue to take jabs at me. woo your the man now dog! reed doughty has 2 speeds walk and kill There is no chin behind Reed Doughty's chin strap. There is only another fist. Please dont accuse me of acting anything. I whole heartedly admitted that I was wrong on the diagram you threw up. I dont expect you to act humbly and admit you were wrong on the Bills catch, the 2 TO TD's or the Boss TD. Youth today doesnt know humility. You all are kings of the world. Thank you for the discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrockster21 Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 A fine discussion on SS & Cover-2 schemes, but as suggested, how about one of you starting a new thread for it and our future coverage needs. Alllow this one to be for fun as intended. And avoid the insults--you were doing well but it's betting closer. Sorry, Jumbolicious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxpck Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 its the safties job to cover over top the WR he should made a better play on the ball instead of your MLB :doh: thats why they call it cover 2 the safties cover deep halfs of the field in a zone like coverage :doh1: DONT START. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ffxdrummer Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Sorry to get all bunched up. The comments were meant for the 5 plays I originally talked about. Not the safety position as a whole. Safeties (and strong safeties) are one of the most dynamic positions on the field, the 5 plays I orignally called Reed out on were plays were he distincly had over the top pass coverage responsibility. Obviously he wont always have that. i am just worried that other teams are going to react when he does, a la Archuletta. I never played organized football, so I couldn't tell you the intricacies of the schemes, but I'm an editor, and you've added an extra t to Archuleta this whole time. It's been very upsetting. Nevermind, looks like Reed had a little "talk' with Archie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laxpck Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 I never played organized football, so I couldn't tell you the intricacies of the schemes, but I'm an editor, and you've added an extra t to Archuleta this whole time. It's been very upsetting. Nevermind, looks like Reed had a little "talk' with Archie. HAHAHAHAHA The extra T was for Toast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
#98QBKiller Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 The Doughty bandwagon is nice and comfortable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chow184 Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Please dont accuse me of acting anything. I whole heartedly admitted that I was wrong on the diagram you threw up.I dont expect you to act humbly and admit you were wrong on the Bills catch, the 2 TO TD's or the Boss TD. Youth today doesnt know humility. You all are kings of the world. Thank you for the discussion. and on all 5 of your plays I picked your argument apart. to which doughty had not blown the coverage in ANY of them nothing wrong with being humble in defeat. it was a good debate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JaimeDeCurry Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 He's a freak! He's the fastest kid alive! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrepDC Posted December 18, 2007 Share Posted December 18, 2007 Sorry to get all bunched up. The comments were meant for the 5 plays I originally talked about. Not the safety position as a whole. Safeties (and strong safeties) are one of the most dynamic positions on the field, the 5 plays I orignally called Reed out on were plays were he distincly had over the top pass coverage responsibility. Obviously he wont always have that. i am just worried that other teams are going to react when he does, a la Archuletta. I think everyone here would admit that Reed is going to need some work on his coverage skills, especially WHEN he is responsible for deep(although I doubt he has that responsibility very often anytime soon since Landry has been playing deep middle), but to compare him to Arch is a bit premature. Arch was a good tackler with NO natural cover skills. We don't know if Reed's problem is ability or experience at this point. I'm leaning more towards the inexperience than the "he's the next Archuleta" theory. JMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.