tr1 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 He's been in the league how long, now? Roger Robins, Torrance, Calif.: Has Tony Romo sits to pee altered his release in the past couple of games? The ball seems to tail off or drop away at times, and his accuracy has taken a nose dive. Mickey: Romo sits to pee must constantly monitor his throwing motion, because at times he starts dropping his hand down, and you are right, that's what happens to the ball. He threw a couple of passes this past Sunday with the nose of the ball aiming down, which is a hard ball to catch. (See the Terrell Owens drop on third down.) And when Romo sits to pee starts winging it sidearm, yes, the ball will naturally start to tail away. Good points. http://www.dallascowboys.com/news.cfm?contentType=5&id=B9E88D7B-006A-DD5B-92E9B6B747E91BA6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I can see TO getting a hold of this and blaming Romo sits to pee for all his drops!:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HapHaszard Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I can see TO getting a hold of this and blaming Romo sits to pee for all his drops!:laugh: TO has drops? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MEANDWARF Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I can see TO getting a hold of this and blaming Romo sits to pee for all his drops!:laugh: Let the Soap Opera begin! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pjfootballer Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Mt. Owens is ready to errupt!! Save the Womens and Childrens!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Tr1 I don't think you are the only one to notice Romo sits to pee's mechanics issue. I mean, 32 teams bypassed him 7 times in the draft for a reason! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted October 20, 2007 Author Share Posted October 20, 2007 Tr1 I don't think you are the only one to notice Romo sits to pee's mechanics issue. I mean, 32 teams bypassed him 7 times in the draft for a reason! Damn, DWinzit, you're absolutely right! My apologies to the NFL. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCranon21 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 The question I'm going to ask is when will the excuses start flying? I'm ready to hear them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SonnyRules Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Hopefully, his poor mechanics will eventually be his downfall. Perhaps, up until now, he has has an enormous amount of luck and it is time for that luck run out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanboyOf91 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 He needs to work on this ASAP. Bad habits are hard to break as his career goes on, and can cost his team games. Not that I mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFan Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Romo sits to pee has mechanics issues he has been and is working on. Yep. TheFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted October 20, 2007 Author Share Posted October 20, 2007 Romo sits to pee has mechanics issues he has been and is working on. Yep.TheFan He's in his fifth year...this crap should be behind him. They guy has no discipline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DWinzit Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 He's in his fifth year...this crap should be behind him.They guy has no discipline. Club Wade probably won't help in getting him that discipline!:laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bacon Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Romo sits to pee has mechanics issues he has been and is working on. Yep.TheFan Then why is he sucking more with each passing game? He should keep the mechanics issues. :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Then why is he sucking more with each passing game? He's not. Actually he followed a sub par game at Buffalo with a great game against N.E.. A much better defense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted October 20, 2007 Author Share Posted October 20, 2007 He's not. Actually he followed a sub par game at Buffalo with a great game against N.E.. A much better defense. :laugh: :laugh: He was so great, he was averaging over 300 yards a game...last week, not so good...less than 200. ...and there was that Miami game... :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike619 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 He's not. Actually he followed a sub par game at Buffalo with a great game against N.E.. A much better defense. It was definitely a step up against the Buffalo game; 4INTs would have been too. He threw for 2 TDs and 1 INT in that game and rushed for -1 yards. I dont know if I would call that great. 62.1% isnt what you guys like to see, as I notice in the Campbell bashing threads in here constantly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheFan Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Then why is he sucking more with each passing game? He should keep the mechanics issues. :laugh: Perhaps because he isn't "sucking more with each passing game". Romo sits to pee had a decent, not great game, against the Pats. So far he's had one bad game this season. I expect he will have them from time to time. Even with his worst performance of the year, he put his team in position to win at the end. I'm good with that. Cheers TheFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 It was definitely a step up against the Buffalo game; 4INTs would have been too. He threw for 2 TDs and 1 INT in that game and rushed for -1 yards. I dont know if I would call that great. 62.1% isnt what you guys like to see, as I notice in the Campbell bashing threads in here constantly. I would call it stellar based on what Bellichick does to young inexperienced QB's. I think it was a great effort considering the competition but I know that perspective is unpopular here. I realize where I am. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 Perhaps because he isn't "sucking more with each passing game". Romo sits to pee had a decent, not great game, against the Pats. So far he's had one bad game this season. I expect he will have them from time to time. Even with his worst performance of the year, he put his team in position to win at the end. I'm good with that. Cheers TheFan I wonder what would have been said about Aikman had there been an extremeskins in say 1990 or so. That would have been interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike619 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I would call it stellar based on what Bellichick does to young inexperienced QB's. I think it was a great effort considering the competition but I know that perspective is unpopular here. I realize where I am. Nah man, I am not coming at you all sideways and "Romo sits to pee sucks" but I do believe that Campbell gets bashed when he throws a "sub-par" game so it would seem fair to do the same back. Well if you think Bellichick is stellar, wait until week 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigMike619 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 I wonder what would have been said about Aikman had there been an extremeskins in say 1990 or so. That would have been interesting. "I cant wait until 2001 when he retires after a hit from LaVar.." http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZUuRfp8NR4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bubba9497 Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 He's not. Actually he followed a sub par game at Buffalo with a great game against N.E.. :rotflmao: no Brady had a GREAT GAME 5 TD's no interceptions, winning by 21 on the road Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tr1 Posted October 20, 2007 Author Share Posted October 20, 2007 :rotflmao: no Brady had a GREAT GAME 5 TD's no interceptions, winning by 21 on the road In fact, bubba, it was a CAREER game for Brady. Never once, in his entire career, had he passed for FIVE touchdowns...and arguably, he had a chance for seven... Now, and objective observer might say that since he had such a successful outing, it may be that he faced one of the worst pass defenses he's ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEHEREAFTER Posted October 20, 2007 Share Posted October 20, 2007 :rotflmao: no Brady had a GREAT GAME 5 TD's no interceptions, winning by 21 on the road No Brady had a sensational game. A sick game. Romo sits to pee had a great game. Keep in mind that I'm factoring in the fact that it was his 16th game as a starter facing Billichick and the #2 ranked defense in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.