bigroddy76 Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 Glad To Have Him I Agree With Isifan. He Is Playing Like A Vet. Took Some Bad Angles In Earlier Games,but Who Hasnt. He Is A Great Compliment To Taylor . He Makes Our Defense Better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redskins4ever Posted October 16, 2007 Share Posted October 16, 2007 LaRon Landry is a very good player. He's only a rookie who has played in only five games. He sealed the victory in the Philly game with a jarring hit on 4th down. He plays hard and he's tough. He has definitely lived up to my expectations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinsFanAnt Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 All I can say is...did you see that pop he gave Plexiglass?...damn! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brotherz Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 This question is in light of the fact that ESPN was showing a highlight reel of Adrian Peterson. They called him the second best RB in all of the NFL, and moreover, they questioned all six teams picking before the Vikings in the draft for not taking him. Now, I'm not saying the idiots at ESPN are right. After all, each team has different needs, and who's to say that LL doesn't become the most dominant safety in the league at some point, or that Calvin Johnson doesn't become the best WR in the league? In any case, it got me to wondering, has LL lived up to your expectations?For me, I think I have not heard his name as much as I heard ST's name during his rookie season. There are so many playmakers on this defense, that he LL could have a great game for a rookie and still get lost in the mix. I do think that he upgrades us at the SS position, and that he will be a rock there for years to come, and with that in mind, he has filled some of my expectations but not all of them. That being said, he's only played five games. Thoughts? Without a doubt he has lived up to it. So much so that you have apparently forgotten he is a rookie. Safety and running back are also very different as far as ability to come in and make an immediate impact in the NFL, Landry has been perfect as far as Im concerned as a rookie safety. I hope to see him and ST as a Tandem for many many years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinfan2k Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 espn also hyped up cadallac too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RenegadeTK Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 Now Carlos R clearly choked on that tackle to Packer's TE #85, but did anyone else think it was kind of strange the way Landry pushed Rogers out of the play on his way to (try) and chase him down? It looked a little unnecessary to me.... i think LL is still adjusting to nfl speed. he's taken several bad angles at players, but he probably would have made those plays in college. he will adapt and learn... cant wait to see how he is playing by the end of the season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuryYourDuke Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 The guy has exceeded my expectations. I don't really see him making the kind of mistakes I expect out of rookies, and see out of veterans *coughs*. I was a big let's draft for the d-line guy, so I am willing to eat crow here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wyvern Posted October 18, 2007 Share Posted October 18, 2007 i think LL is still adjusting to nfl speed. he's taken several bad angles at players, but he probably would have made those plays in college. he will adapt and learn... cant wait to see how he is playing by the end of the season That was my sense too. However, there's a great article in the DC Examiner by Matt Bowen about how Landry is allowing Taylor to become a premier Free Safety in the NFL, and lifting the entire defense.I was looking for the website of this article, but it looks like the Examiner publishes on the web a day later than their printed article. I'll look for it tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcoles11 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 This isn't really a pressing issue with me but I just wanted other thoughs on it. Has Landry impressed you so far? Do you think he has a bright future? Do you think maybe he was drafted too high? I honestly haven't noticed him and I thought he's be more of an impact player. I had visions of him being the blitzing saftey and laying out QBs left and right and it just hasn't happened. I also thought he came into the league with a rep of being a sure tackler, when I have noticed him its been when the announcer is pointing him out for missing a tackle. Only 4 things come to mind when I think about what Landy has done this season. 1.) He broke up the pass to end the Eagles 2.) He got a dumb penalty today that kept a drive going. 3.) He made an interception today. 4.) He's not the sure tackler that he was made out to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkinSince87 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 1 the oline injuries are very serious its the core of the offense itself 2 anyone beside barry sanders cant run beind this hurt oline 3 ill worry about Suisham when he actually losses a game 4 Moss needs to look in the mirror...period 5 Landry is a rookie period, he is way better then AA last year who was a vet and compare Landry to many SS throughout the league and his numbers stack up well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcoles11 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 1 the oline injuries are very serious its the core of the offense itself2 anyone beside barry sanders cant run beind this hurt oline 3 ill worry about Suisham when he actually losses a game 4 Moss needs to look in the mirror...period 5 Landry is a rookie period, he is way better then AA last year who was a vet and compare Landry to many SS throughout the league and his numbers stack up well Thanks for responding to my orignial 5 questions but I noticed most are already discussed in the forum already so I wanted to narrow it to just Landry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor 21 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 He saved us 2 games this season.... you havent noticed that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desioreo87 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 This criticism of portis is really annoying. How can anyone expect him to run behind a makeshift offensive line. I mean maybe he doesn't look like himself becuse he hasn't really been given a chance except against the dolphins when (coincidently? i think not) he had an OL to run behind, he averaged 5 yards per carry and got a TD. Portis is not gonna have a great season this year because our OL is never gonna be healthy. We just have to persevere with the run game cause we cant afford to be one-dimensional with our Wrs playing the way they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smurf85 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 He saved us 2 games this season.... you havent noticed that? He also gave up a lot of big plays in the middle today. They stayed away from Taylor and attacked Landry and they succeeded. I love the guy, but he had a bad game today. Yes I know he got a pick today, but lets not forget who threw that ball(Boldin) . That was one of the stupidest play calls I have ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcoles11 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 He saved us 2 games this season.... you havent noticed that? I would hardly say he saved the game today. For one he is the reason that one of their drives continued and lead to a TD, after a very stupid late hit. And on the 2 point conversion he did pick the pass off but that pass had no chance whether he was there or not. He did make a good play agains the Eagles at the game, which I pointed out. My thing is, he hasn't been nearly the tackler that he was hyped up to be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WARLORD1863 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 1. We certainly have suffered a great deal in our o-line, but any team worth a darn find ways to strategize around the weakest part of the team. The fact that the team had a week to form a competent strategy and failing on gameday suggests to me that a) the problem is simply unfixable because somehow we messed up and stocked up on back-ups who can barely pass as a player, or the strategy was flawed and the coaching staff will have to come up with something brand new for next week if the injuries continue, or c) the plan was simply to plug in players with no regard for strategy or competency and hope for the best. Bottom line, it's not the injuries that will destroy our season its how we are able to work around them. 2. Problem stems from #1, the strategy for using a weak o-line really didn't work, PERIOD. They need to figure out how to generate a run-game with the injuries. It's difficult, but if anybody can figure it out I know Joe Gibbs can. 3. I'm not worried about Suisham, but Frost has caught my attention with the weak kickoffs. 4. I don't know what has been Moss' problem from the start of this season. The homers will point out the o-line for this past game, excusing Campbell and the recievers from criticism, but Moss has had problems before the o-line was a problem. I know he's a superb reciever, but there certainly is something wrong. I just don't know what it is. 5. I think Landry, being thrown into the mix right off the bat, has done a terrific job. I'm very impressed with the way he's able to adapt to the NFL so quickly. He isn't a Sean Taylor yet, but I think he will be. dcoles11, I know you wanted to narrow it down to just landry, but I started writing my response before that happened and I don't want my words of wisdom to go to waste. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gregpeck99 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 It gauls me to think the Skins could have had Petersen ... anyone else share this feeling? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dcoles11 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 1. We certainly have suffered a great deal in our o-line, but any team worth a darn find ways to strategize around the weakest part of the team. The fact that the team had a week to form a competent strategy and failing on gameday suggests to me that a) the problem is simply unfixable because somehow we messed up and stocked up on back-ups who can barely pass as a player, or the strategy was flawed and the coaching staff will have to come up with something brand new for next week if the injuries continue, or c) the plan was simply to plug in players with no regard for strategy or competency and hope for the best.Bottom line, it's not the injuries that will destroy our season its how we are able to work around them. 2. Problem stems from #1, the strategy for using a weak o-line really didn't work, PERIOD. They need to figure out how to generate a run-game with the injuries. It's difficult, but if anybody can figure it out I know Joe Gibbs can. 3. I'm not worried about Suisham, but Frost has caught my attention with the weak kickoffs. 4. I don't know what has been Moss' problem from the start of this season. The homers will point out the o-line for this past game, excusing Campbell and the recievers from criticism, but Moss has had problems before the o-line was a problem. I know he's a superb reciever, but there certainly is something wrong. I just don't know what it is. 5. I think Landry, being thrown into the mix right off the bat, has done a terrific job. I'm very impressed with the way he's able to adapt to the NFL so quickly. He isn't a Sean Taylor yet, but I think he will be. dcoles11, I know you wanted to narrow it down to just landry, but I started writing my response before that happened and I don't want my words of wisdom to go to waste. haha no problem brother, thanks for the comments! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corrupt3d Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Compared to Arch Deluxe? Yes. Compared to what I expected him to be? No, but get at me in a few weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Muzzah Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 He's no Meast, but he is definitely carrying his weight. Huge upgrade from that guy from last year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedskinInExile Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 He's a rookie and he's showing some serious potential. Some people outside DC are calling ST-Landry the best safety combo in the league. He's not rookie of the year by any means, but I'm happy with him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skinsfan080 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 You guys have to remember too...Sean Taylor wasent even starting at this point of his rookie season, he was playing only in special packages. Landry started from day one, which really makes me excited about this kids ability. GIlliams doesnt like to play rookies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.